Chicago Fanatics Message Board
http://chicagofanatics.com/

Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting
http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=110889
Page 23 of 29

Author:  Caller Bob [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Oh boo hoo, Brick is pissing you off. Cowboy the fuck up.

Author:  Curious Hair [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Ogie: people like me will murder policemen if AR-15s are banned
Brick: get a load of this dude
Board: BRICK HOW COULD YOU TAKE IT BACK RIGHT NOW

Author:  Darkside [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

I've had enough. I tried to have a civilized conversation on this topic all week. And I get as a reward a long time poster like brick trolling and joking and bullshitting his way thru the threads making honest, open and true conversation impossible.
I take a lot of the blame in this. I brought my thoughts to this site. That's a big mistake. I shouldn't have tried to have a serious conversation here. I should have learned my lesson 12 years ago.
I'm done with it.
Best of luck brick I hope you get your laughs.

Later.

Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Curious Hair wrote:
Ogie: people like me will murder policemen if AR-15s are banned
Brick: get a load of this dude
Board: BRICK HOW COULD YOU TAKE IT BACK RIGHT NOW


Like, not at all what's going on.

Author:  Don Tiny [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

This thread now serves no further purpose other than for BRick to write some obfuscatory blather followed by Pavlovian dopes showing him what he already knows is true but is purposefully ignoring it, with a smattering of low-effort troll posts. I have no idea what BRick is trying to do here other than perhaps taking a crack at emulating Seacrest's debate style.

Anyone that doesn't think there would be significant uprising from MANY loons if it was decided that all guns or a large swath of guns were now illegal, they don't pay much attention to anything outside of their own four walls.

I do not own a gun.

Have a blessed day.

Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Don Tiny wrote:
This thread now serves no further purpose other than for BRick to write some obfuscatory blather followed by Pavlovian dopes showing him what he already knows is true but is purposefully ignoring it, with a smattering of low-effort troll posts. I have no idea what BRick is trying to do here other than perhaps taking a crack at emulating Seacrest's debate style.

Anyone that doesn't think there would be significant uprising from MANY loons if it was decided that all guns or a large swath of guns were now illegal, they don't pay much attention to anything outside of their own four walls.

I do not own a gun.

Have a blessed day.


Low effort troll post.

Author:  tommy [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Don Tiny wrote:
This thread now serves no further purpose other than for BRick to write some obfuscatory blather followed by Pavlovian dopes showing him what he already knows is true but is purposefully ignoring it, with a smattering of low-effort troll posts. I have no idea what BRick is trying to do here other than perhaps taking a crack at emulating Seacrest's debate style.

Anyone that doesn't think there would be significant uprising from MANY loons if it was decided that all guns or a large swath of guns were now illegal, they don't pay much attention to anything outside of their own four walls.

I do not own a gun.

Have a blessed day.


That's really good analysis. Interesting thread overall.

There's definitely good BRick and troll BRick, and this is troll BRick.

Author:  tommy [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
This thread now serves no further purpose other than for BRick to write some obfuscatory blather followed by Pavlovian dopes showing him what he already knows is true but is purposefully ignoring it, with a smattering of low-effort troll posts. I have no idea what BRick is trying to do here other than perhaps taking a crack at emulating Seacrest's debate style.

Anyone that doesn't think there would be significant uprising from MANY loons if it was decided that all guns or a large swath of guns were now illegal, they don't pay much attention to anything outside of their own four walls.

I do not own a gun.

Have a blessed day.


Low effort troll post.

:lol: Good phrase, eh?

Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

tommy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
This thread now serves no further purpose other than for BRick to write some obfuscatory blather followed by Pavlovian dopes showing him what he already knows is true but is purposefully ignoring it, with a smattering of low-effort troll posts. I have no idea what BRick is trying to do here other than perhaps taking a crack at emulating Seacrest's debate style.

Anyone that doesn't think there would be significant uprising from MANY loons if it was decided that all guns or a large swath of guns were now illegal, they don't pay much attention to anything outside of their own four walls.

I do not own a gun.

Have a blessed day.


Low effort troll post.

:lol: Good phrase, eh?


Love it.

Author:  Caller Bob [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

I can't tell you how many times I have gone at with with Brick on this site. Eventually, I just decide to move on. I don't threaten to have a thread locked, leave the site for good, shoot up a group of people that disagree with me, etc. Everything is drastic it seems.

Author:  Don Tiny [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
This thread now serves no further purpose other than for BRick to write some obfuscatory blather followed by Pavlovian dopes showing him what he already knows is true but is purposefully ignoring it, with a smattering of low-effort troll posts. I have no idea what BRick is trying to do here other than perhaps taking a crack at emulating Seacrest's debate style.

Anyone that doesn't think there would be significant uprising from MANY loons if it was decided that all guns or a large swath of guns were now illegal, they don't pay much attention to anything outside of their own four walls.

I do not own a gun.

Have a blessed day.


Low effort troll post.

:D

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Rick said nothing untowards in this thread.

Author:  Nas [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Terry's Peeps wrote:
Rick said nothing untowards in this thread.


My guy told me the same thing.

Author:  Hatchetman [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

great thread today.

Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Hatchetman wrote:
great thread today.


I liked the part where BRick induced an argument about a technical point of language.

Author:  Baby McNown [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
great thread today.


I liked the part where BRick induced an argument about a technical point of language.

I know he's not capable of sarcasm, so I'm really starting to wonder if Juice actually is Julie.

Author:  Brick [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Darkside wrote:
I've had enough. I tried to have a civilized conversation on this topic all week. And I get as a reward a long time poster like brick trolling and joking and bullshitting his way thru the threads making honest, open and true conversation impossible.
I take a lot of the blame in this. I brought my thoughts to this site. That's a big mistake. I shouldn't have tried to have a serious conversation here. I should have learned my lesson 12 years ago.
I'm done with it.
Best of luck brick I hope you get your laughs.

Later.

Your other posts on this have been great.

I wasn't trolling. I think mentioning that other gun owners will kill cops and bomb innocent people if AR15s are taken away is scary and makes me want more gun control to lessen the danger of people like that.

My impression was Ogie not only was expressing they would but he also seemed to take joy in the fact given his post about how they would get the ammo first.

Then FF tried to parse it that I was saying ogie would. I explained that was not the case and I didn't mean that. FF ignored it a few times and I'm the true bad guy here.

Author:  Curious Hair [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 3:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Ogie said law-abiding citizens would kill cops who took their assault rifles away. If he sees himself as a law-abiding citizen, it stands to reason he might want to kill a cop.

Author:  Quad City Pete [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Well, it looks like all the fascists are out in full swing. I'll tell you what, though, I carry two AR-15's on either side of my torso everywhere I go. And if you want to see them unleashed, just start spewing your anti-liberal alt-right Republican Nazi propaganda. They're fully loaded and ready to blow your ass away if you wanna open your mouth. Trust me, I don't run out of ammunition either. These bulging carbines will pummel you to mother earth pretty quickly. So if you want instant pain, just keep yappin', and keep up all that intolerant hate. Because one thing that I can't tolerate is intolerance. I'll fucking pound it into the ground and bury you real deep. Think about that for a while.

Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 5:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Quad City Pete wrote:
Well, it looks like all the fascists are out in full swing. I'll tell you what, though, I carry two AR-15's on either side of my torso everywhere I go. And if you want to see them unleashed, just start spewing your anti-liberal alt-right Republican Nazi propaganda. They're fully loaded and ready to blow your ass away if you wanna open your mouth. Trust me, I don't run out of ammunition either. These bulging carbines will pummel you to mother earth pretty quickly. So if you want instant pain, just keep yappin', and keep up all that intolerant hate. Because one thing that I can't tolerate is intolerance. I'll fucking pound it into the ground and bury you real deep. Think about that for a while.


You're not really who you say you are, and you don't really mean what you say. CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD!!!!111!!!2005111!

Author:  312player [ Sun Feb 18, 2018 7:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Caller Bob wrote:
I can't tell you how many times I have gone at with with Brick on this site. Eventually, I just decide to move on. I don't threaten to have a thread locked, leave the site for good, shoot up a group of people that disagree with me, etc. Everything is drastic it seems.




:lol: drama queens..smh

Author:  whiskey dick [ Mon Feb 19, 2018 1:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

One darkside is worth ten Boilermaker Ricks, and a hundred whiskey dicks. Let’s hope that he readjusts his panties and comes back stronger than ever. Although we must remind ourselves that some birds are not meant to be caged.

Author:  Nas [ Mon Feb 19, 2018 1:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

whiskey dick wrote:
One darkside is worth ten Boilermaker Ricks, and a hundred whiskey dicks. Let’s hope that he readjusts his panties and comes back stronger than ever. Although we must remind ourselves that some birds are not meant to be caged.


He never left. Just left this thread .

Author:  Minooka Meatball [ Mon Feb 19, 2018 1:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I wasn't trolling.


Not enough :lol: s for one reply posting.

Early QOTY candidate, and thanks for my first-ever CFMB sig.

Author:  Brick [ Mon Feb 19, 2018 4:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Minooka Meatball wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I wasn't trolling.


Not enough :lol: s for one reply posting.

Early QOTY candidate, and thanks for my first-ever CFMB sig.

Gun people get very defensive it seems. It makes me concerned about the "good guy with a gun" theory.

Author:  Regular Reader [ Mon Feb 19, 2018 5:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

And now according to the Washington Post, some nitwits from this White House are viewing the shooting as a reprieve from the bad news he got last week.

I'd like to believe that is an exaggeration, but that it sounds believable, completely immoral and yet completely believable with this group of jackals.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

I think headlines like this are helpful and in no way hinder useful dialogue.

CBS News‏Verified account
@CBSNews
Follow Follow @CBSNews
More
In Florida, it's easier to buy an assault rifle than it is to obtain cold medicine http://cbsn.ws/2CvoAQK

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Feb 19, 2018 7:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I wasn't trolling.


Not enough :lol: s for one reply posting.

Early QOTY candidate, and thanks for my first-ever CFMB sig.

Gun people get very defensive it seems. It makes me concerned about the "good guy with a gun" theory.

The only time I owned a personal gun when I was also in the military and I said the same thing he did. Several non gun guys did. You just singled him out for some reason

Author:  Brick [ Mon Feb 19, 2018 7:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I wasn't trolling.


Not enough :lol: s for one reply posting.

Early QOTY candidate, and thanks for my first-ever CFMB sig.

Gun people get very defensive it seems. It makes me concerned about the "good guy with a gun" theory.

The only time I owned a personal gun when I was also in the military and I said the same thing he did. Several non gun guys did. You just singled him out for some reason

You asked me who did. I gave a name. Ogie was the first name that came to mind. Others may have said similar things too but there wasn't the sense of joy I sensed with Ogie with comments like "ammo first".

Author:  Minooka Meatball [ Mon Feb 19, 2018 7:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Minooka Meatball wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I wasn't trolling.


Not enough :lol: s for one reply posting.

Early QOTY candidate, and thanks for my first-ever CFMB sig.

Gun people get very defensive it seems. It makes me concerned about the "good guy with a gun" theory.

Page 23 of 29 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/