Chicago Fanatics Message Board • View topic

View unanswered posts | View active topics

Board index » GENERAL BULLSHIT SECTION » GENERAL DISCUSSION

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Page 3 of 4

[ 98 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next

Print view

Previous topic | Next topic

Author

Message

Caller Bob

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2024 8:21 pm

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 40109
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's

McCareins_Fan wrote:

wow, twitter.com just solved it. cancel the investigation.

Caller Bob wrote:

[Tweet]https://twitter

Funny post, faggg...did your wife's boyfriend type that up for you?

Top

Nas

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2024 8:25 pm

100000 CLUB

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77140
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU

Top

Tall Midget

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2024 9:41 pm

1000 CLUB

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 27795
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's

That gets three smilies from you, Nas?

I bet you think Rahimi is a 9.5, too.

_________________

Antonio Gramsci wrote:

The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.

Top

Nas

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2024 9:45 pm

100000 CLUB

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77140
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222

Tall Midget wrote:

That gets three smilies from you, Nas?

I bet you think Rahimi is a 9.5, too.

Sometimes I'm good for a cheap laugh. The "wife's boyfriend" did it for me.

Did you see our SB head coach on Hoge & Jahns?

Top

Hawg Ass

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2024 10:56 pm

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 28489

Nas wrote:

Jaw Breaker wrote:

Caller Bob wrote:

[Tweet]https://twitter

Maybe the captain thought the pillar would stop the ship? Nothing short of a mountain was going to stop that kind of mass.

You’re a true ass

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur

Top

Nas

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2024 11:56 pm

100000 CLUB

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77140
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222

Hawg Ass wrote:

Nas wrote:

Jaw Breaker wrote:

Caller Bob wrote:

[Tweet]https://twitter

Maybe the captain thought the pillar would stop the ship? Nothing short of a mountain was going to stop that kind of mass.

You’re a true ass

Top

good dolphin

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2024 7:24 am

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80164

Nas wrote:

Tall Midget wrote:

That gets three smilies from you, Nas?

I bet you think Rahimi is a 9.5, too.

Sometimes I'm good for a cheap laugh. The "wife's boyfriend" did it for me.

Did you see our SB head coach on Hoge & Jahns?

Did you ever see the short vid of the polyamorous hipster ginger proudly responding to a wife's boyfriend joke about him? I really love how defiant he is in the face of the world laughing at him...like the joke Scorcesee's mom tells about her compare at the family party in Goodfellas

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.

Top

Jaw Breaker

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 2:29 am

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 15990
pizza_Place: Boni Vino

Biden is saying “the federal government will ‘pay the entire cost of reconstructing’ the bridge.”

Um, shouldn’t the firm that destroyed it (or their insurance company) pay for it?

_________________

To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:

Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?

Top

Hawg Ass

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 4:00 am

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 28489

Jaw Breaker wrote:

Biden is saying “the federal government will ‘pay the entire cost of reconstructing’ the bridge.”

Um, shouldn’t the firm that destroyed it (or their insurance company) pay for it?

He’s saying he isn’t waiting around for that to go thru the courts, fix it and let that take place when it does.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur

Top

Seacrest

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:54 am

Site Admin

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37241
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's

Hawg Ass wrote:

Jaw Breaker wrote:

Biden is saying “the federal government will ‘pay the entire cost of reconstructing’ the bridge.”

Um, shouldn’t the firm that destroyed it (or their insurance company) pay for it?

He’s saying he isn’t waiting around for that to go thru the courts, fix it and let that take place when it does.

Is there a question here of who is liable?

_________________

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.

Top

pittmike

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 7:26 am

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 39749
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos

Jaw Breaker wrote:

Biden is saying “the federal government will ‘pay the entire cost of reconstructing’ the bridge.”

Um, shouldn’t the firm that destroyed it (or their insurance company) pay for it?

Yes there will be insurance. Biden is making points is all. 5 years from now no one will ask if Biden paid for it all.

_________________

Brick wrote:

Biden is doing a GOOD job.

Top

Hawg Ass

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 7:31 am

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 28489

Seacrest wrote:

Hawg Ass wrote:

Jaw Breaker wrote:

Biden is saying “the federal government will ‘pay the entire cost of reconstructing’ the bridge.”

Um, shouldn’t the firm that destroyed it (or their insurance company) pay for it?

He’s saying he isn’t waiting around for that to go thru the courts, fix it and let that take place when it does.

Is there a question here of who is liable?

Isn’t there always? Hell, there was litigation when the crane collapsed in Milwaukee, we all knew that answer.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur

Top

IkeSouth

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 8:17 am

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 26559

its another example of how fragile our society is. one mistake and the entire port of baltimore is shut down for at least a couple weeks, likely months before full use again.

what a massive undertaking too, trying to get that old bridge out of there. we dont have the technology needed to do it quickly. theyre going to have to send divers to rig up cables and torch it out of there piece by piece. 2900ft of steel.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.

Top

IkeSouth

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 8:18 am

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 26559

Hawg Ass wrote:

Isn’t there always? Hell, there was litigation when the crane collapsed in Milwaukee, we all knew that answer.

wind blew it over. are you suggesting god didnt do it?

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.

Top

a retard

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:56 am

Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:08 am
Posts: 6597
Location: Section 433
pizza_Place: 1. Homemade 2. Jewels

pittmike wrote:

Jaw Breaker wrote:

Biden is saying “the federal government will ‘pay the entire cost of reconstructing’ the bridge.”

Um, shouldn’t the firm that destroyed it (or their insurance company) pay for it?

Yes there will be insurance. Biden is making points is all. 5 years from now no one will ask if Biden paid for it all.

Lloyd's of London, and they say they are ready.

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/28/baltimo ... oyds-.html

_________________
"I honestly don't see a good bet on the board here."

Top

Frank Coztansa

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 12:06 pm

100000 CLUB

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101886
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's

pittmike wrote:

Jaw Breaker wrote:

Biden is saying “the federal government will ‘pay the entire cost of reconstructing’ the bridge.”

Um, shouldn’t the firm that destroyed it (or their insurance company) pay for it?

Yes there will be insurance. Biden is making points is all. 5 years from now no one will ask if Biden paid for it all.

Just another example of having insurance being a good thing!

_________________

ltg wrote:

[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!

Caller Bob wrote:

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

Top

Tall Midget

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 12:19 pm

1000 CLUB

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 27795
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's

Jaw Breaker wrote:

Biden is saying “the federal government will ‘pay the entire cost of reconstructing’ the bridge.”

Um, shouldn’t the firm that destroyed it (or their insurance company) pay for it?

Was the shipping company negligent in maintaining the vessel?

The ship pilots are employees of the Baltimore Port Administration, aren't they?

_________________

Antonio Gramsci wrote:

The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.

Top

veganfan21

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 12:21 pm

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's

I believe the crew is comprised of foreign nationals.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY

Top

Nardi

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 12:24 pm

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 28601
pizza_Place: What??

Tall Midget wrote:

Jaw Breaker wrote:

Biden is saying “the federal government will ‘pay the entire cost of reconstructing’ the bridge.”

Um, shouldn’t the firm that destroyed it (or their insurance company) pay for it?

Was the shipping company negligent in maintaining the vessel?

The ship pilots are employees of the Baltimore Port Administration, aren't they?

But isn't that between the Insurance and the company? That shouldn't affect the payout. I don't have a clue about your second point.

Top

Caller Bob

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 12:28 pm

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 40109
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's

I guess you are going to have sue the hackers that broke into the ships control system and disabled the power. Good luck

Top

Tall Midget

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 12:32 pm

1000 CLUB

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 27795
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's

Nardi wrote:

Tall Midget wrote:

Jaw Breaker wrote:

Biden is saying “the federal government will ‘pay the entire cost of reconstructing’ the bridge.”

Um, shouldn’t the firm that destroyed it (or their insurance company) pay for it?

Was the shipping company negligent in maintaining the vessel?

The ship pilots are employees of the Baltimore Port Administration, aren't they?

But isn't that between the Insurance and the company? That shouldn't affect the payout. I don't have a clue about your second point.

I would think it is important to know who and what caused the crash before it can be determined who is responsible for paying for the damage caused by the crash.

_________________

Antonio Gramsci wrote:

The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.

Top

Seacrest

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 12:56 pm

Site Admin

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37241
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's

Hawg Ass wrote:

Seacrest wrote:

Hawg Ass wrote:

Jaw Breaker wrote:

Biden is saying “the federal government will ‘pay the entire cost of reconstructing’ the bridge.”

Um, shouldn’t the firm that destroyed it (or their insurance company) pay for it?

He’s saying he isn’t waiting around for that to go thru the courts, fix it and let that take place when it does.

Is there a question here of who is liable?

Isn’t there always? Hell, there was litigation when the crane collapsed in Milwaukee, we all knew that answer.

Lloyds of London understands who is liable. And they won't be sitting around waiting to get an invoice from Joe Biden for "services rendered"

_________________

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.

Top

Hawg Ass

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 1:16 pm

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 28489

Seacrest wrote:

Hawg Ass wrote:

Seacrest wrote:

Hawg Ass wrote:

Jaw Breaker wrote:

Biden is saying “the federal government will ‘pay the entire cost of reconstructing’ the bridge.”

Um, shouldn’t the firm that destroyed it (or their insurance company) pay for it?

He’s saying he isn’t waiting around for that to go thru the courts, fix it and let that take place when it does.

Is there a question here of who is liable?

Isn’t there always? Hell, there was litigation when the crane collapsed in Milwaukee, we all knew that answer.

Lloyds of London understands who is liable. And they won't be sitting around waiting to get an invoice from Joe Biden for "services rendered"

Again, who is liable?

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur

Top

Seacrest

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 1:57 pm

Site Admin

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37241
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's

Hawg Ass wrote:

Seacrest wrote:

Hawg Ass wrote:

Seacrest wrote:

Hawg Ass wrote:

Jaw Breaker wrote:

Biden is saying “the federal government will ‘pay the entire cost of reconstructing’ the bridge.”

Um, shouldn’t the firm that destroyed it (or their insurance company) pay for it?

He’s saying he isn’t waiting around for that to go thru the courts, fix it and let that take place when it does.

Is there a question here of who is liable?

Isn’t there always? Hell, there was litigation when the crane collapsed in Milwaukee, we all knew that answer.

Lloyds of London understands who is liable. And they won't be sitting around waiting to get an invoice from Joe Biden for "services rendered"

Again, who is liable?

The ship for sure.

https://www.ft.com/content/c44306cc-605 ... 7d096765f6

_________________

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.

Top

Nardi

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 2:08 pm

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 28601
pizza_Place: What??

Tall Midget wrote:

Nardi wrote:

Tall Midget wrote:

Jaw Breaker wrote:

Biden is saying “the federal government will ‘pay the entire cost of reconstructing’ the bridge.”

Um, shouldn’t the firm that destroyed it (or their insurance company) pay for it?

Was the shipping company negligent in maintaining the vessel?

The ship pilots are employees of the Baltimore Port Administration, aren't they?

But isn't that between the Insurance and the company? That shouldn't affect the payout. I don't have a clue about your second point.

I would think it is important to know who and what caused the crash before it can be determined who is responsible for paying for the damage caused by the crash.

Lloyd's is responsible for paying. It's insurance. Just because I fall asleep at the wheel and drive through a house doesn't mean my insurance has a right to not pay up. maybe they sue me to recoup, I don't know.

Top

Tall Midget

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 2:34 pm

1000 CLUB

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 27795
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's

Nardi wrote:

Tall Midget wrote:

Nardi wrote:

Tall Midget wrote:

Jaw Breaker wrote:

Biden is saying “the federal government will ‘pay the entire cost of reconstructing’ the bridge.”

Um, shouldn’t the firm that destroyed it (or their insurance company) pay for it?

Was the shipping company negligent in maintaining the vessel?

The ship pilots are employees of the Baltimore Port Administration, aren't they?

But isn't that between the Insurance and the company? That shouldn't affect the payout. I don't have a clue about your second point.

I would think it is important to know who and what caused the crash before it can be determined who is responsible for paying for the damage caused by the crash.

But if someone else drives your car through a house, your insurance might not be responsible for paying, depending on other circumstances.

_________________

Antonio Gramsci wrote:

The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.

Top

Nardi

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 2:42 pm

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 28601
pizza_Place: What??

Tall Midget wrote:

Nardi wrote:

Tall Midget wrote:

Nardi wrote:

Tall Midget wrote:

Jaw Breaker wrote:

Biden is saying “the federal government will ‘pay the entire cost of reconstructing’ the bridge.”

Um, shouldn’t the firm that destroyed it (or their insurance company) pay for it?

Was the shipping company negligent in maintaining the vessel?

The ship pilots are employees of the Baltimore Port Administration, aren't they?

But isn't that between the Insurance and the company? That shouldn't affect the payout. I don't have a clue about your second point.

I would think it is important to know who and what caused the crash before it can be determined who is responsible for paying for the damage caused by the crash.

But if someone else drives your car through a house, your insurance might not be responsible for paying, depending on other circumstances.

Valid point but if industry standards are what they seem to be.....

Top

IkeSouth

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2024 3:42 pm

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 26559

these ships dont even meet us regulations. we only allow them in if theyre hitting a port directly. they cant cross two ports because of compliance. its not surprising to have this happen. seems crazy this is the first time.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.

Top

Jaw Breaker

Post subject: Re: Cargo Ship v. Bridge

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2024 12:10 pm