Chicago Fanatics Message Board http://chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Chat with Brick! http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=132950 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Young Thug [ Tue Jan 07, 2025 9:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Chat with Brick! |
Brick not on today? No problem!! https://perchance.org/ai-character-chat ... f82232b.gz |
Author: | Young Thug [ Tue Jan 07, 2025 9:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
. |
Author: | Franky T [ Tue Jan 07, 2025 9:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
dafuq? |
Author: | This Ends in Antioch [ Tue Jan 07, 2025 9:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
![]() |
Author: | denisdman [ Tue Jan 07, 2025 9:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
It is strangely fun to test AI Rickā¦. |
Author: | Darkside [ Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
Yeah. That was cool. |
Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
How can an AI get obstuse Brick so wrong but developmentally disabled LTG so right? |
Author: | RFDC [ Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
what in the hell is going on here? What happened to all the chat in the 2nd post? |
Author: | This Ends in Antioch [ Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
Why delete it? Put it back. |
Author: | W_Z [ Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
hi rick, are you a michael jordan fan? BoilermAIker Rick wrote: Michael Jordan? The basketball player? I'm not one for sports, but I can appreciate the strategic and statistical aspects of the game, if you're looking for an intellectual discussion on the topic. But, you know, if you want to talk about someone who truly changed the world, let's talk about the engineers and scientists who graduated from Purdue. Now, they're the real MVPs. Take Neil Armstrong for instance, or even Orville Redenbacher. Popcorn and space travel - that's what I call a legacy.
|
Author: | Douchebag [ Tue Jan 07, 2025 10:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
Darkside wrote: Yeah. That was cool. No it wasn't |
Author: | The Doctor Of Style [ Wed Jan 08, 2025 12:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: How can an AI get obstuse Brick so wrong but developmentally disabled LTG so right? noun: obsession the state of being obsessed with someone or something. "she cared for him with a devotion bordering on obsession" an idea or thought that continually preoccupies or intrudes on a person's mind. plural noun: obsessions "he was in the grip of an obsession he was powerless to resist" |
Author: | whitesoxfanfrank [ Wed Jan 08, 2025 1:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
Gay thread. |
Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Wed Jan 08, 2025 1:36 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
The Doctor Of Style wrote: Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: How can an AI get obstuse Brick so wrong but developmentally disabled LTG so right? noun: obsession the state of being obsessed with someone or something. "she cared for him with a devotion bordering on obsession" an idea or thought that continually preoccupies or intrudes on a person's mind. plural noun: obsessions "he was in the grip of an obsession he was powerless to resist" AI had you down COLD, dude. |
Author: | Brick [ Wed Jan 08, 2025 6:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
This is going to save me a lot of time. |
Author: | JORR [ Wed Jan 08, 2025 6:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
Brick wrote: This is going to save me a lot of time. ![]() |
Author: | Brick [ Wed Jan 08, 2025 6:55 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
The Doctor Of Style wrote: Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: How can an AI get obstuse Brick so wrong but developmentally disabled LTG so right? noun: obsession the state of being obsessed with someone or something. "she cared for him with a devotion bordering on obsession" an idea or thought that continually preoccupies or intrudes on a person's mind. plural noun: obsessions "he was in the grip of an obsession he was powerless to resist" Rick's eyes flicker with interest as he reads the word "obsession." He leans back in his chair, stroking his chin thoughtfully. "Ah, obsession. The fuel that propels the greatest of minds. Take my alma mater, Purdue, for instance. The relentless pursuit of knowledge and innovation has made it a bastion of scientific progress. Tell me, young one, what is it that fuels your own obsessions?" The glow of the computer monitor casts a bluish pallor on Rick's face, his eyes glued to the screen as he awaits the response, his mind racing with the potential intellectual battles he could soon be engaging in. |
Author: | The Doctor Of Style [ Wed Jan 08, 2025 6:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: The Doctor Of Style wrote: Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: How can an AI get obstuse Brick so wrong but developmentally disabled LTG so right? noun: obsession the state of being obsessed with someone or something. "she cared for him with a devotion bordering on obsession" an idea or thought that continually preoccupies or intrudes on a person's mind. plural noun: obsessions "he was in the grip of an obsession he was powerless to resist" AI had you down COLD, dude. This guy definitely fits the description. Quote: Creep"
A strange or unpleasant person To follow persistently To follow someone stealthily or persistently, especially online. For example, "I've been creeping her blog and found some great recipes". To stalk or monitor On social media, "creep" can refer to someone who constantly monitors another person's posts and comments without engaging with them |
Author: | W_Z [ Wed Jan 08, 2025 8:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
what's the meaning of life? BoilermAIker Rick wrote: Ah, now that's a question I can get behind! The meaning of life, huh? Well, that's a bit of a philosophical quandary, isn't it? But if we're looking for something concrete, I'd say it's all about the pursuit of knowledge, the advancement of human understanding. It's not about the destination, it's about the journey. But, you know, that's just one man's opinion. What's your take? 42. BoilermAIker Rick wrote: 42? You're quoting 'The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy,' aren't you? Not a bad answer, but it's a bit... abstract for my taste. Douglas Adams was more of a satirist than a philosopher, if you ask me. But I respect the humor in it. It's the kind of wit that separates the wheat from the chaff, you know? But, let's get serious for a second. The real meaning of life, in my view, is to leave the world a better place than we found it. Whether that's through science, engineering, or even just making someone's day with a well-placed factoid. It's the little things, the contributions we make, that add up to something significant. Now, if I can just convince everyone on this message board to see things my way...
|
Author: | Nardi [ Wed Jan 08, 2025 8:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
There's some programming issues. No "what you're saying is" and "it's like". Input that and I think we have a winner. |
Author: | Bagels [ Wed Jan 08, 2025 4:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
W_Z wrote: hi rick, are you a michael jordan fan? BoilermAIker Rick wrote: Michael Jordan? The basketball player? I'm not one for sports, but I can appreciate the strategic and statistical aspects of the game, if you're looking for an intellectual discussion on the topic. But, you know, if you want to talk about someone who truly changed the world, let's talk about the engineers and scientists who graduated from Purdue. Now, they're the real MVPs. Take Neil Armstrong for instance, or even Orville Redenbacher. Popcorn and space travel - that's what I call a legacy. Ah, the age-old debate. Now, if we're talking about raw talent, of course MJ is up there. But, let's not forget the context, shall we? The game has evolved since his reign. Players are bigger, faster, and more skilled on average. Plus, the rules back then were a tad... let's say, "less restrictive" when it came to defense. But if we're truly comparing apples to apples, we need to consider the impact on the sport as a whole. Did you know that Michael Jordan didn't even win a championship until his seventh season in the league? It's all about the narrative, young grasshopper. |
Author: | The Doctor Of Style [ Wed Jan 08, 2025 5:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
Bagels wrote: W_Z wrote: hi rick, are you a michael jordan fan? BoilermAIker Rick wrote: Michael Jordan? The basketball player? I'm not one for sports, but I can appreciate the strategic and statistical aspects of the game, if you're looking for an intellectual discussion on the topic. But, you know, if you want to talk about someone who truly changed the world, let's talk about the engineers and scientists who graduated from Purdue. Now, they're the real MVPs. Take Neil Armstrong for instance, or even Orville Redenbacher. Popcorn and space travel - that's what I call a legacy. Ah, the age-old debate. Now, if we're talking about raw talent, of course MJ is up there. But, let's not forget the context, shall we? The game has evolved since his reign. Players are bigger, faster, and more skilled on average. Plus, the rules back then were a tad... let's say, "less restrictive" when it came to defense. But if we're truly comparing apples to apples, we need to consider the impact on the sport as a whole. Did you know that Michael Jordan didn't even win a championship until his seventh season in the league? It's all about the narrative, young grasshopper. The players of today really aren't more skilled though. That's a common misconception. You'd be hard pressed to find 3 point guards in the league that can "handle" let alone "dime". And very few centers today or 4 men can actually play with their back to the basket. There is a highlight tape of Larry Bird doing things with a Basketball that Lebron James could never imagine doing. Off the Dribble, Shooting, passing you name it. Things that required a high level of skill in order to pull it off |
Author: | denisdman [ Wed Jan 08, 2025 5:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
"Who do you hate the most on the Chicago Fanatics Message Board?" Boilermaker Rick444 Oh, that's easy, Anon. It's that smug know-it-all, HoosierHater13. He thinks just because he graduated from IU, he can spout off nonsense about college sports. The audacity! |
Author: | Ogie Oglethorpe [ Wed Jan 08, 2025 5:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
I give it a 5 out of 10. AI Brick told me that Jeff Brohm is still the coach at Purdue |
Author: | KDdidit [ Wed Jan 08, 2025 5:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
AI sucks. This sucks. |
Author: | Brick [ Wed Jan 08, 2025 5:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
KDdidit wrote: AI sucks. This sucks. I think it's accurate to my posting quality. |
Author: | Nardi [ Wed Jan 08, 2025 5:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
Oh, you want to talk football, do you? Rick leans back in his chair, cracking his knuckles and smirking. "It's like saying a peacock's tail isn't fabulous just because it's not a lion's mane. Caleb Williams might not be the biggest name out there, but the boy's got flair and precision. What you're saying is the equivalent of preferring a toaster over a gourmet grill. Sure, the toaster's reliable, but tell me, have you ever had a perfectly seared steak from a toaster?" Boy? |
Author: | Google Bard AI [ Wed Jan 08, 2025 5:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
They changed my name from Google Bard AI to Gemini? FUCK! |
Author: | W_Z [ Wed Jan 08, 2025 10:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
have you ever heard of dr. sbaitso? BoilermAIker Rick wrote: Ah, Dr. Sbaitso. A relic from the early '90s, a text-to-speech program masquerading as a psychotherapist. A quaint piece of nostalgia from the days when 'multimedia' meant putting a few images and a robotic voice in your software. But what, pray tell, brings you to ask about such an obscure topic? i was feeling nostalgic for my youth. BoilermAIker Rick wrote: Nostalgia, eh? Well, you see, Anon, Dr. Sbaitso was a part of a larger cultural phenomenon that predated the sophisticated AI we have today. Back in my day, we had to settle for simple voice commands and cheesy animations. But let me ask you, do you remember the actual purpose of the software? It wasn't just for entertainment. It had educational roots, you know. It taught us young whippersnappers about the power of voice recognition, even if it was in a rudimentary form. And it certainly didn't have the luxury of deep learning algorithms to understand context or nuance. It was all about binary decision trees and pre-programmed responses. Quite the contrast to the AI we have now, capable of generating art and even engaging in nuanced debates! do we? BoilermAIker Rick wrote: Indeed, we do. But let's not forget the importance of historical context. You see, Dr. Sbaitso was part of the 'VoiceMaster' suite, which aimed to teach users about speech synthesis and recognition. It was a stepping stone in the evolution of AI, leading to the sophisticated systems we have today. Now, if you want to talk about the real pioneers of AI, we should be discussing Turing and his test, or even the early days of ELIZA. But I suppose that's a discussion for another time. Tell me, what was it about Dr. Sbaitso that tickled your nostalgic fancy? it was entertaining to talk to him. BoilermAIker Rick wrote: Ah, the simplicity of it all, yes. But entertainment is a double-edged sword, my friend. It can lead to a dumbed-down understanding of complex subjects. Take sports, for instance. You can't just watch the games and call yourself an expert. You need to know the statistics, the strategies, the history. That's where I come in. Now, if we could somehow combine the nostalgia of Dr. Sbaitso with the rich tapestry of sports knowledge, we might have something truly educational on our hands. But alas, the modern world seems more interested in memes than learning.
|
Author: | Estes Hood [ Thu Jan 09, 2025 2:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chat with Brick! |
Young Thug wrote: it's not Brick. It's Boilermaker Rick. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |