If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.

:lol:

GREAT SHOW!!!!

If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.

Even now, while at his worst, TB is better than Waddle at his best. This is not even up for debate. Case closed.

If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.

:lol:

Yeah, I know B&B arent for everyone. I like to laugh and to disagree with my radio hosts from time to time. It's the perfect show for me. I know it gets bogged down with Dan's agenda now but when they hit their moments its just great. Even when W&S are hitting all their marks and putting out a good show it just does nothing for me. Silvy might be good if unleashed from the Mouse but Waddle is just blah to me. I do enjoy the Cutler show but it is not because of W&S. I think Cutler is an assbag and it makes me laugh.

This is Tao. Joe Maddon as Laozi.

Did somebody say grass?

Waddle is dead weight. The whole oblivious sports duffus thing only works for guys who can be funny or insightful on occasion, Waddle brings neither. I'm not a Silvy fan, mostly because of his terrible voice, but he'd be better off with a different co-host. I think the reason W&S are doing good against B&B is because even at their worst they're not nearly as annoying as B&B

Almost nothing worse than a vapid ex-"athlete" who literally contributes nothing to society--and indeed steals from society--yet likely makes high 6 figures per year and feels the need to espouse his somewhat gay Republican politics on AM Radio. The only thing worse is the hideous and speech-impaired Fred Huebner who makes like $40k per year at best yet still does the same thing.