Miss you FF.

What I said was factual.

ESPN's Dan Graziano on SportsCenter: "The Eagles, from what I understand talking to sources around the league, were one of the teams that had talked to the Bears about Justin Fields, but obviously could not get to the point where they agreed on a price, so they traded for Pickett." #Steelers #NFL
5:29 PM · Mar 15, 2024

I'm close to the center on most issues.

·

Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.

We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants

You just posted something that agreed with Brick’s post.

I'm close to the center on most issues.

You're wrong about that.

Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.

We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants

You just posted something that agreed with Brick’s post.

We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

The Eagles were interested in Fields but thought he wasn’t valuable enough to meet the Bears’ price. So they chose Pickett over Fields

The Eagles chose a bad QB as a backup over Fields even though Fields is a perfect fit for backing up Hurts.

I'm close to the center on most issues.

This is silly and actually very "CFMBesque" in fact. Brick's original point claimed that Philly "chose" Pickett over Fields. Graziano's point says nothing of the sort.



'

Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.

We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants

If you believe the report, they were interested in Fields but chose Pickett over him given the cost.

I'm close to the center on most issues.

It's clear from the report that they "settled" for the lesser player because the Bears wanted too much (in their opinion at least) for the guy THEY REALLY WANTED.

Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.

We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants

Right. We’re saying the same thing.

They didn’t think Fields was worth the cost and were fine choosing the Pickett option.

*if the reporting is correct

I'm close to the center on most issues.

Nothing in the report suggests that Philly had a "choice" between the 2 players and "chose" Pickett

Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.

We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants

The report literally says they talked to the Bears but couldn’t agree on a price. That was the choice.

We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.

I have no idea what this Groupthink thing is but what do you mean?

Notice this was never addressed.

I have no idea what this Groupthink thing is but what do you mean?

If you read any Vegan post then you most definitely will have a much better understanding. In short it has to do with Justin Fields sucking as a QB.

I'm close to the center on most issues.

I didn't bother to count them but it is really funny that you guys were arguing about the truth of a THEORETICAL DEAL BETWEEN THE BEARS AND THE EAGLES THAT MOST LIKELY DIDN'T HAPPEN GIVEN THAT THE SO-CALLED "SOURCE" CITED AVAILABLE SOURCES WHICH OF COURSE RE NOT IDENTIFIED.

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

All the proof I need that fields is not the guy is the lack of interest from other teams. Nobody is making their case to acquire him.
Of course that's the proof. What I know is that by watching his games I can clearly see he's not great, probably isn't good, and is likely bad.

Was this post about Fields or The Hawk’s posting ability?

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

You bet, pig.

Yes it is.

When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.

I didn't bother to count them but it is really funny that you guys were arguing about the truth of a THEORETICAL DEAL BETWEEN THE BEARS AND THE EAGLES THAT MOST LIKELY DIDN'T HAPPEN GIVEN THAT THE SO-CALLED "SOURCE" CITED AVAILABLE SOURCES WHICH OF COURSE RE NOT IDENTIFIED.

The Steelers trade was definitely a "L" for CFMB's Groupthink crowd. Really no other way to look at it.

This is where you come in again: be there as the unconditionally caring friend or family member that you really are. Where the cult judges and condemns its members, you will be there as the person who says:

Sure, it is a crazy destructive group, but I understand why you got involved. We all fall for con artists and swindlers once in a while – you still have a lot to offer and I can help you move on with your life.

After the cult, the world can seem a bleak and less exciting place. But, with the help of family and friends, the former member can build a new and more authentic life and purpose. Hang in there and you’ll be what they really do need at the end of the rainbow.

LTG and The Hawk being on the same side of an argument is why I love this place.

Like I said in an earlier post, Far Left and Far Right joining together, only the Fields Blow Jobbers.

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

No, my reading and comprehension is just fine, but your response shouldn’t shock me.

Also, if you believe Mr. Fields is an All Pro quarterback, how is the possibility of maybe being a backup in Pittsburgh a W for you?

I'm close to the center on most issues.

If he goes to Pittsburgh he won't be a backup. And how do "we" know that you, as a Packer fan, aren't pulling the old "swerve" move with all of your Justin Fields dissing? I think that secretly you know that he is a player and want him out of the division as a result of it

He is not starting ahead of Wilson in Pittsburgh, period unless an injury. I have seen plenty of Fields and I assure you there is no concern about an NFL quarterback that can’t play quarterback.

I'm close to the center on most issues.

He's part of a cult based on the belief that Fields is not only better than Williams but Fields is a top 3-5 QB today, there's no debate.

Justin Fields is easily in the top 5 when it comes to talent at the QB position in the NFL.