It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 4:24 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 91 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80165
IMU wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
We would be excoriating cutler if they lost by six and he threw two picks in the red zone


Jay Cutler makes 17 million this year.


Irrelevant. The original post was that the bear would not need to draft a qb because of what Barkley did today

Wasn't this Barkley's first NFL appearance?

We're comparing a ~10 year veteran's decision making to a red-shirted rookie?


No, we are not. We are comparing him to a pick in the 2017 draft

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80165
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
We would be excoriating cutler if they lost by six and he threw two picks in the red zone

No we would blame everyone else instead.


Jay Cutler gets no blame in this town and the Cubs do not get enough media attention.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80165
Marcus Mariotta looked great yesterday. He had pinpoint accuracy on deep throws that I didn't know he had. Meanwhile, he is doing it with average WR. He will be a star next year.

I thought the knock on Barkley was a noodle arm. I thought it looked pretty strong yesterday

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
Marcus Mariotta looked great yesterday. He had pinpoint accuracy on deep throws that I didn't know he had. Meanwhile, he is doing it with average WR. He will be a star next year.

I thought the knock on Barkley was a noodle arm. I thought it looked pretty strong yesterday


Barkley was one of the biggest high school recruits in the last decade. Never thought his arm was in question. More the decision making. Glad he is getting a look. Hope he shows something because the offense is a total cesspool. Jordan Howard can't be a feature back if he can't catch the ball.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18469
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Now the meathead Chicago media thinks Jimmy Garoppolo is the answer.According to Haugh "Before the draft arrives, the Bears need to exhaust every option to acquire Patriots backup quarterback Jimmy Garoppolo, an Arlington Heights native with enough talent and charisma to reinvigorate a sleepy organization. That should be Plan A. No other plans sound better — or have worked." He is a 2016 version of Matt Cassel........plus when I think charismatic Jimmy pops into mind. Give Pace a damn chance.....and remember the Chicago meathead media kept telling us Mark Trestman coached Rich Gannon to a Pro Bowl :shock: which didn't have a damn thing to do with him being a head coach. Cub fans gave Theo time ,Bear fans do the same for Pace.

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
good dolphin wrote:
No, we are not. We are comparing him to a pick in the 2017 draft

No one is saying the Bears should not draft a QB.

We're just shitting on Cutler.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
Now the meathead Chicago media thinks Jimmy Garoppolo is the answer.According to Haugh "Before the draft arrives, the Bears need to exhaust every option to acquire Patriots backup quarterback Jimmy Garoppolo, an Arlington Heights native with enough talent and charisma to reinvigorate a sleepy organization. That should be Plan A. No other plans sound better — or have worked." He is a 2016 version of Matt Cassel........plus when I think charismatic Jimmy pops into mind. Give Pace a damn chance.....and remember the Chicago meathead media kept telling us Mark Trestman coached Rich Gannon to a Pro Bowl :shock: which didn't have a damn thing to do with him being a head coach. Cub fans gave Theo time ,Bear fans do the same for Pace.

Patriots wont do it for anything less than a top 50 pick, and the Bears can draft a better QB than Jimmy Garoppolo inside the top 50. Also, doesn't Garappolo only have one more year before free agency? So that gets rid of that 2-3 year window where the Bears could find themselves with a good QB and the salary cap space to keep a few guys and/or acquire a couple free agents. Kind of like Oakland who took themselves to the next level by adding Smith, Irvin and Crabtree because Carr is a still a bargain.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22706
pizza_Place: A few...
No to Garrapolo.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80165
IMU wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
No, we are not. We are comparing him to a pick in the 2017 draft

No one is saying the Bears should not draft a QB.

We're just shitting on Cutler.


The original post was precisely about Bears not drafting a QB, irrespective of the poster's intentions.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Two things:

1) Have you not known a thread to take a turn?

2) The OP was already declared sarcasm...though it seems the declaration was only needed for you.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80165
IMU wrote:
Two things:

1) Have you not known a thread to take a turn?

2) The OP was already declared sarcasm...though it seems the declaration was only needed for you.


One thing: you wrote "no one".

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
One more thing: I will correct it to say "no one seriously"

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 15991
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Holy cow...he threw 33 passes in the 4th quarter alone? That has to be close to a record.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4669
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Barkley has given us all a reason to watch these remaining games. He looked like a "gunslinger" out there, almost Favre or Fouts-esque, heaving the rock down-field all the time.

The Rosenbloom piece yesterday was completely unfair. Yes, he threw two red zone INTs in his first NFL start. But what about the 4th quarter comeback? He put the team in a position to win more than once. What about all the completions he would have had if the receivers had not been completely inept?

If Romo wants to come to Chicago, I would take him. Have Barkley as the back-up. But I would also be ok if Barkley was the starter going forward. If he plays well again next game, people will be saying, "Jay who?".

Kudos to Loggains for his play-calling, too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2016 3:52 pm
Posts: 360
pizza_Place: Local entrepreneurs only
Dignified Rube wrote:
Barkley has given us all a reason to watch these remaining games. He looked like a "gunslinger" out there, almost Favre or Fouts-esque, heaving the rock down-field all the time.

The Rosenbloom piece yesterday was completely unfair. Yes, he threw two red zone INTs in his first NFL start. But what about the 4th quarter comeback? He put the team in a position to win more than once. What about all the completions he would have had if the receivers had not been completely inept?

If Romo wants to come to Chicago, I would take him. Have Barkley as the back-up. But I would also be ok if Barkley was the starter going forward. If he plays well again next game, people will be saying, "Jay who?".


Fuck yeah! Motherfucker shot himself in the foot a couple times but it's not like he tried to. I like his moxie.

_________________
libtard's personfied:

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
You said "naked" and bearing breasts (which are reproductive organs and thus technically "genitals" are they not?) is "naked" for all intents and purposes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26640
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
The first INT was a 50/50 ball that the receiver could have caught.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:50 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101893
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Dignified Rube wrote:
Barkley has given us all a reason to watch these remaining games.
No he hasn't. This team is terrible and nearly impossible to watch. I would rather get a spray tan.

Dignified Rube wrote:
But what about the 4th quarter comeback? He put the team in a position to win more than once. What about all the completions he would have had if the receivers had not been completely inept?
He made some nice throws, but you cannot ignore the fact that MANY of those were against a prevent defense and a corner back who was cut after the game. If the Bears WRs had not been "ept" they would have screwed themselves on draft position.

Dignified Rube wrote:
If Romo wants to come to Chicago, I would take him. Have Barkley as the back-up. But I would also be ok if Barkley was the starter going forward. If he plays well again next game, people will be saying, "Jay who?".
Barkely, Romo, Cutler...whoever the starter is should simply be a place holder for the QB they draft, or possibly Connor Shaw if they feel he is the QB of the future. Start the first few games until the next QB is ready, and then Barkley/Cutler/Romo holds a clip board for the rest of the season, as none of those guys are going to win a playoff games while on the Bears.

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23917
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
OK. This guy was projected to be the #1 overall at one point. got injured. stuff happened. starts one game for bears throws 400 yards and 3TDs in his first NFL start. he's already better than cutler.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Hatchetman wrote:
OK. This guy was projected to be the #1 overall at one point. got injured. stuff happened. starts one game for bears throws 400 yards and 3TDs in his first NFL start. he's already better than cutler.


If your TV repairman destroys the two TVs he was supposed to fix, then to make up for it replaces those TVs with nearly identical models and walks out, are you happy with the service he provided?

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23917
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
if that's the first time he's ever tried to fix a TV, I'd be pretty impressed.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80165
I hope people deluge Rozner with calls for Barkley on his next day in studio

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 39753
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
good dolphin wrote:
I hope people deluge Rozner with calls for Barkley on his next day in studio


You mean right now?

_________________
Brick wrote:
Biden is doing a GOOD job.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 40119
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
I would trade the Bears first rounder for Jimmy Garoppolo in a heartbeat.

Hub Arkush said on the radio last week that Garoppolo would cost two 1st round picks and more.

Where does the truth lie?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
The pride of Arlington Heights.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2016 3:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Liking what I see from Barkley again. No problem bringing him back next year for more of a look.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2016 3:16 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101893
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
He looks like a very capable backup.

I think this game is a case of the 49ers being really, really bad more than it is Barkley being this good.

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2016 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11486
pizza_Place: Dino's
Image

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2016 3:54 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101893
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Yeah, the 49ers are really fucking bad. If the Browns & 9ers played eachother, I would bet on the Browns.

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4669
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Frank Coztansa wrote:
He looks like a very capable backup.

I think this game is a case of the 49ers being really, really bad more than it is Barkley being this good.


Little egg on your face, Frank?

The Bears have their quarterback now in Barkley. If you want to get Romo, too, fine.

Even if San Fran is bad, Barkley was still throwing a lot of accurate passes in the worst of conditions yesterday, even downfield. He's the most talent at the position I have seen in a long time on a Bears roster.

Don't need to waste that 1st round pick on a QB now. You still need receivers and a right guard, since Long can't play more than two games in a row without getting hurt.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Matt Barkley
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:51 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101893
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
No.

The 49ers suck. I think they are worse than their 1-11 record. Barkley did nothing in the first ~12minutes of this game.

Barkley is a capeable backup who should be in camp.with the Bears next year. Nothing more. The Bears dont necessarily have to use thier first pick on a QB, but they must draft at least 1.

Jay Cutler is more talnted than Barkley. That is a fact.

Almost everything you posted is wrong.

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 91 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group