It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:04 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 6:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 3851
pizza_Place: Lino's
Theorized numerous times that Poles was out on Fields from day one, but knew it would take 2-3 years to rebuild his roster and reset his cap, so he kept Justin around until he felt the roster was upgraded enough to compete.

It makes perfect sense when you look at several glaring pieces of evidence.

GM's always want their guy at QB, when you reset the rookie deal window you have several years to add salaries before you have to pay your QB and end up in cap hell like the Chargers.

Poles had seven draft picks in the first three rounds while Fields was on the roster, he picked five defensive players and two offensive players, only one offensive lineman and never addressed the glaring weakness at center. The forced a QB that had a difficult time reading defenses to make the line checks, a vet center could have helped him out immensely, the fact that they did not address that position spoke volumes as they had to know it would limit the offense.

The offense was not built to cater to things Fields does well, they tried to make him a pocket passer when the rest of the league saw that his only chance for success was to get the pocket moving to take advantage of his abilities.

It seems a 2-3 year tank was the plan all along, he could have reset at QB last year, but moved the #1 pick to prepare for this year where he saw a better QB class and had cap room to make trades and absorb a few big cap hits.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 6:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:52 pm
Posts: 12706
Location: My Pants
pizza_Place: Geo's Pizza
Can't agree more with all you said. I'm excited that Poles has set up Caleb for success like this. Having one more receiver, or Scott improving greatly from last year, would be the final icing on the cake for the offense having almost everything you could ask for with a rookie QB coming in.

_________________
The Original Spanky wrote:
I don't like white rappers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 7:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6471
pizza_Place: Giordano's
I am curious.... Without a mid to late 1st round pick, where are they going to acquire this center? I am pretty sure 2-3 centers will go in the 1st round.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 7:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 15977
pizza_Place: Salerno's


Image



Image





Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 7:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 32289
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Cashman wrote:
I am curious.... Without a mid to late 1st round pick, where are they going to acquire this center? I am pretty sure 2-3 centers will go in the 1st round.


They signed the Rams starting center.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 8:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 40109
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
ClawGPT or deni$..most obnoxious attention whore on CFMB..who ya got?!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 9:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2213
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Clawmaster wrote:
Theorized numerous times that Poles was out on Fields from day one, but knew it would take 2-3 years to rebuild his roster and reset his cap, so he kept Justin around until he felt the roster was upgraded enough to compete.

It makes perfect sense when you look at several glaring pieces of evidence.

GM's always want their guy at QB, when you reset the rookie deal window you have several years to add salaries before you have to pay your QB and end up in cap hell like the Chargers.

Poles had seven draft picks in the first three rounds while Fields was on the roster, he picked five defensive players and two offensive players, only one offensive lineman and never addressed the glaring weakness at center. The forced a QB that had a difficult time reading defenses to make the line checks, a vet center could have helped him out immensely, the fact that they did not address that position spoke volumes as they had to know it would limit the offense.

The offense was not built to cater to things Fields does well, they tried to make him a pocket passer when the rest of the league saw that his only chance for success was to get the pocket moving to take advantage of his abilities.

It seems a 2-3 year tank was the plan all along, he could have reset at QB last year, but moved the #1 pick to prepare for this year where he saw a better QB class and had cap room to make trades and absorb a few big cap hits.


So, you agree with Holmes, Rahimi, Greenberg, etc., that Fields was set up to fail?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6471
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Warren Newson wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
Theorized numerous times that Poles was out on Fields from day one, but knew it would take 2-3 years to rebuild his roster and reset his cap, so he kept Justin around until he felt the roster was upgraded enough to compete.

It makes perfect sense when you look at several glaring pieces of evidence.

GM's always want their guy at QB, when you reset the rookie deal window you have several years to add salaries before you have to pay your QB and end up in cap hell like the Chargers.

Poles had seven draft picks in the first three rounds while Fields was on the roster, he picked five defensive players and two offensive players, only one offensive lineman and never addressed the glaring weakness at center. The forced a QB that had a difficult time reading defenses to make the line checks, a vet center could have helped him out immensely, the fact that they did not address that position spoke volumes as they had to know it would limit the offense.

The offense was not built to cater to things Fields does well, they tried to make him a pocket passer when the rest of the league saw that his only chance for success was to get the pocket moving to take advantage of his abilities.

It seems a 2-3 year tank was the plan all along, he could have reset at QB last year, but moved the #1 pick to prepare for this year where he saw a better QB class and had cap room to make trades and absorb a few big cap hits.


So, you agree with Holmes, Rahimi, Greenberg, etc., that Fields was set up to fail?



I am not sure how you teach someone to ready a defense, but... if it can be taught, that is on the Bears for not helping him with this. Now, if he put 0 effort into this, that is on him. You can not be successful in this league but throwing for 2000 yards and not being able to read a defense. He had a legit #1 WR this year and a decent TE. He can not throw the ball, period.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 26559
drake maye sucks

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89030
Location: To the left of my post
Congrats on finally getting something right.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 12:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14351
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Clawmaster wrote:
Theorized numerous times that Poles was out on Fields from day one, but knew it would take 2-3 years to rebuild his roster and reset his cap, so he kept Justin around until he felt the roster was upgraded enough to compete.

It makes perfect sense when you look at several glaring pieces of evidence.

GM's always want their guy at QB, when you reset the rookie deal window you have several years to add salaries before you have to pay your QB and end up in cap hell like the Chargers.

Poles had seven draft picks in the first three rounds while Fields was on the roster, he picked five defensive players and two offensive players, only one offensive lineman and never addressed the glaring weakness at center. The forced a QB that had a difficult time reading defenses to make the line checks, a vet center could have helped him out immensely, the fact that they did not address that position spoke volumes as they had to know it would limit the offense.

The offense was not built to cater to things Fields does well, they tried to make him a pocket passer when the rest of the league saw that his only chance for success was to get the pocket moving to take advantage of his abilities.

It seems a 2-3 year tank was the plan all along, he could have reset at QB last year, but moved the #1 pick to prepare for this year where he saw a better QB class and had cap room to make trades and absorb a few big cap hits.



Yeah when you step back from it, that is probably his thinking. Its clearly Poles and Eberfulsh's mess right now. Its really ironic thatnow Chicago has got two teams that want Chicago to give them two multiple billions dollar sports stadiums right now :drunken: :drunken: I hope both of those teams end up playing in Gary , Indiana.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 12:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 20496
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Brick wrote:
Congrats on finally getting something right.

Definitely wrong.

Fields would be here next year if not for the chance to take Williams. I’m not sure if the Claw theory included the Panthers collapse.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 12:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14351
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Crystal Lake Hoffy wrote:
Can't agree more with all you said. I'm excited that Poles has set up Caleb for success like this. Having one more receiver, or Scott improving greatly from last year, would be the final icing on the cake for the offense having almost everything you could ask for with a rookie QB coming in.



It will never be more clear how a single player can pull down a team than Caleb Williams will next season. What a stupid GM/HC decision. Great opportunity for Bagent to take over as QB. :drunken: :drunken:

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89030
Location: To the left of my post
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Brick wrote:
Congrats on finally getting something right.

Definitely wrong.

Fields would be here next year if not for the chance to take Williams. I’m not sure if the Claw theory included the Panthers collapse.

Maybe one day Claw will be right on something.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 17, 2024 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 40109
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Brick wrote:
Congrats on finally getting something right.

Definitely wrong.

Fields would be here next year if not for the chance to take Williams. I’m not sure if the Claw theory included the Panthers collapse.

Maybe one day Claw will be right on something.


He will be sure to let us know


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 5:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 3851
pizza_Place: Lino's
Warren Newson wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
Theorized numerous times that Poles was out on Fields from day one, but knew it would take 2-3 years to rebuild his roster and reset his cap, so he kept Justin around until he felt the roster was upgraded enough to compete.

It makes perfect sense when you look at several glaring pieces of evidence.

GM's always want their guy at QB, when you reset the rookie deal window you have several years to add salaries before you have to pay your QB and end up in cap hell like the Chargers.

Poles had seven draft picks in the first three rounds while Fields was on the roster, he picked five defensive players and two offensive players, only one offensive lineman and never addressed the glaring weakness at center. The forced a QB that had a difficult time reading defenses to make the line checks, a vet center could have helped him out immensely, the fact that they did not address that position spoke volumes as they had to know it would limit the offense.

The offense was not built to cater to things Fields does well, they tried to make him a pocket passer when the rest of the league saw that his only chance for success was to get the pocket moving to take advantage of his abilities.

It seems a 2-3 year tank was the plan all along, he could have reset at QB last year, but moved the #1 pick to prepare for this year where he saw a better QB class and had cap room to make trades and absorb a few big cap hits.


So, you agree with Holmes, Rahimi, Greenberg, etc., that Fields was set up to fail?


Nope, he had already failed and apparently everyone other than certain board members knew it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 5:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 3851
pizza_Place: Lino's
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Brick wrote:
Congrats on finally getting something right.

Definitely wrong.

Fields would be here next year if not for the chance to take Williams. I’m not sure if the Claw theory included the Panthers collapse.

Maybe one day Claw will be right on something.


Once again you choose an odd hill to die on.

I am just pointing out what the rest of the league recognized a few years ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 5:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 3851
pizza_Place: Lino's
Caller Bob wrote:
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Brick wrote:
Congrats on finally getting something right.

Definitely wrong.

Fields would be here next year if not for the chance to take Williams. I’m not sure if the Claw theory included the Panthers collapse.

Maybe one day Claw will be right on something.


He will be sure to let us know


The massive throbbing football brain known as Caller Bob speaks!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 6:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 3851
pizza_Place: Lino's
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Brick wrote:
Congrats on finally getting something right.

Definitely wrong.

Fields would be here next year if not for the chance to take Williams. I’m not sure if the Claw theory included the Panthers collapse.

Maybe one day Claw will be right on something.


Find your lack of football acumen somewhat astounding, guess you missed the rest of the league passing up the opportunity to trade for Justin Fields, now why do you think that happened?

Poles just took advantage of the rebuild in Carolina and played the odds.

The board members that actually understand the NFL discussed this at length last year and most agreed that the Carolina pick would be at least top 10, this was all likely a bit confusing to you, but try to keep up and you might actually learn a bit about football and the NFL.

Will even send you, Caller Bob, and Nardi a Crayola starter kit, will have to stick to the primary colors at first, but if you keep trying you will eventually get it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 6:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 15977
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Image




Fields may or may not be a better option than some or all of the QB's on the list below.

However, Fields would cost more in terms of:

1. had to spend draft capital to even get Fields in the building. Free agent QB's don't have that extra expense.

2. Fields 5th year option decision due a week after the draft. Steelers or whatever team would pick up the 5th year and it would make the cost of Fields (i believe the 5th year money is guaranteed at that point?) around $27,000,000 for the two seasons combined. Likely Steelers do a Jordan Love type deal with Fields but who knows.

Anyhow. taking Minshew as the example:

Minshew (i) did not cost a draft pick and (ii) makes around / slightly less than Fields and only $15 mil guaranteed.


Image


Depsite the extra cost of trading draft capital and Fields being at the high-end for a back-up QB, Poles (reportedly) still had 5 offers for Fields:




once the market shifted from Fields as potential QB1 (Atlanta before Cousins or Steelers before RWAG signed), the relatively high cost of Fields as a backup made teams less willing to offer better draft picks for Fields.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 6:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89030
Location: To the left of my post
Clawmaster wrote:
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Brick wrote:
Congrats on finally getting something right.

Definitely wrong.

Fields would be here next year if not for the chance to take Williams. I’m not sure if the Claw theory included the Panthers collapse.

Maybe one day Claw will be right on something.


Find your lack of football acumen somewhat astounding, guess you missed the rest of the league passing up the opportunity to trade for Justin Fields, now why do you think that happened?

Poles just took advantage of the rebuild in Carolina and played the odds.

The board members that actually understand the NFL discussed this at length last year and most agreed that the Carolina pick would be at least top 10, this was all likely a bit confusing to you, but try to keep up and you might actually learn a bit about football and the NFL.

Will even send you, Caller Bob, and Nardi a Crayola starter kit, will have to stick to the primary colors at first, but if you keep trying you will eventually get it.

Antioch said you were wrong so I'm going with that.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 7:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 20496
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Brick wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Brick wrote:
Congrats on finally getting something right.

Definitely wrong.

Fields would be here next year if not for the chance to take Williams. I’m not sure if the Claw theory included the Panthers collapse.

Maybe one day Claw will be right on something.


Find your lack of football acumen somewhat astounding, guess you missed the rest of the league passing up the opportunity to trade for Justin Fields, now why do you think that happened?

Poles just took advantage of the rebuild in Carolina and played the odds.

The board members that actually understand the NFL discussed this at length last year and most agreed that the Carolina pick would be at least top 10, this was all likely a bit confusing to you, but try to keep up and you might actually learn a bit about football and the NFL.

Will even send you, Caller Bob, and Nardi a Crayola starter kit, will have to stick to the primary colors at first, but if you keep trying you will eventually get it.

Antioch said you were wrong so I'm going with that.

I wasn’t even offered a crayola starter kit for my efforts.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 7:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89030
Location: To the left of my post
I don't think you even get a starter kit. It's just crayons. You just buy crayons. That's the starter kit.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 7:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 28601
pizza_Place: What??
Clawmaster wrote:
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Brick wrote:
Congrats on finally getting something right.

Definitely wrong.

Fields would be here next year if not for the chance to take Williams. I’m not sure if the Claw theory included the Panthers collapse.

Maybe one day Claw will be right on something.


Find your lack of football acumen somewhat astounding, guess you missed the rest of the league passing up the opportunity to trade for Justin Fields, now why do you think that happened?

Poles just took advantage of the rebuild in Carolina and played the odds.

The board members that actually understand the NFL discussed this at length last year and most agreed that the Carolina pick would be at least top 10, this was all likely a bit confusing to you, but try to keep up and you might actually learn a bit about football and the NFL.

Will even send you, Caller Bob, and Nardi a Crayola starter kit, will have to stick to the primary colors at first, but if you keep trying you will eventually get it.

A double response to Purdue Rick. "And another thing".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 21, 2024 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 3851
pizza_Place: Lino's
Brick wrote:
I don't think you even get a starter kit. It's just crayons. You just buy crayons. That's the starter kit.


You get the starter kit with just the primary colors in pre-school, once you show an ability to think and process things you get access to the 64-color assortment.

Safe to say that most here will never get beyond the NFL acumen starter kit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group