It is currently Tue Apr 30, 2024 3:39 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2024 11:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16003
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Lions play a 1st place schedule 2024: Bills, @Cowgirls, @Texan/Stroud, @Niners, Rams/Stafford looking for revenge among their games. Also, good chance they have an almost-made-the-super-bowl-but-our-coach-is-a-dumbass hangover from last season.


O'Connell and the Vikings strike out getting a QB in the draft--and maybe even if they draft a QB--do they dial/snapchat/facetime/swipe-right-on-QB-tinder TB12
.
NFC team easiest path back to the Super Bowl for Brady. NFC South easiest division; but he's already been-there, done-that with the Bucs and Falcons/Saints heavily invested in Cousins/Carr.

2 best potential Brady landing-spots in terms of roster/QB need and path-of-least-resistance to SBXI for TB12 are in the NFC North.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2024 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 4540
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Tall Midget wrote:
NME wrote:
As for the Bears, there will be growing pains at QB -there’s a reason why what Stroud did is so rare.. but 9 wins should be fairly easy to come by considering how close some of the Bears losses were last year with a QB that struggled to throw for 150 yards a game.


Fields averaged about 247 yards of total offense per game last year.

Will Williams be able to surpass that?




I think if he throws for that amount per game or close to that it will open up the run game for the backs more instead of the QB needing to eat up those rushing yards.. and yes I think it’s possible for him to have a total average that matches my or exceeds that. Especially with as much of a ‘thrower’ he is. And of course, Williams can scramble too


Also, I think Fields was around total 225 per game.. that’s very doable

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2024 7:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14375
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Pretty weak draft scenario for the Bear's. they went from a terrific bounty from their number one pick to having 4 fucking picks in the entire draft. All for a short contact adverse quarterback from a university with a piss poor track record of "developing generational quarterbacks".

Now NASty is having conniptions about the two best receivers on the BEARS being Over-rated and too old. And they havent' improved their offensive line, defensive backfield, tight end, and defensive end spots. All the draft picks which the smart trade of the number one pick would have given them. What a "deal" they turned down.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2024 7:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 32310
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
The Hawk wrote:
Pretty weak draft scenario for the Bear's. they went from a terrific bounty from their number one pick to having 4 fucking picks in the entire draft. All for a short contact adverse quarterback from a university with a piss poor track record of "developing generational quarterbacks".

Now NASty is having conniptions about the two best receivers on the BEARS being Over-rated and too old. And they havent' improved their offensive line, defensive backfield, tight end, and defensive end spots. All the draft picks which the smart trade of the number one pick would have given them. What a "deal" they turned down.


You do not like the signings at center and safety? They added a tight end too. I feel like the Bears made solid moves so far.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2024 8:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14375
pizza_Place: Grazianos
denisdman wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Pretty weak draft scenario for the Bear's. they went from a terrific bounty from their number one pick to having 4 fucking picks in the entire draft. All for a short contact adverse quarterback from a university with a piss poor track record of "developing generational quarterbacks".

Now NASty is having conniptions about the two best receivers on the BEARS being Over-rated and too old. And they havent' improved their offensive line, defensive backfield, tight end, and defensive end spots. All the draft picks which the smart trade of the number one pick would have given them. What a "deal" they turned down.


You do not like the signings at center and safety? They added a tight end too. I feel like the Bears made solid moves so far.


No I don't. They had the chance at getting an OT and WR in the first round. A TE in rd 3 and a DE in Rd 2 and a C in the 4th Rd. In my opinion, Poles "settled" at the additions you mentioned in my knowledge of the players they added/ I may be wrong. Its happened before. :wink: :wink:

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2024 11:30 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77179
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Tall Midget wrote:
NME wrote:
As for the Bears, there will be growing pains at QB -there’s a reason why what Stroud did is so rare.. but 9 wins should be fairly easy to come by considering how close some of the Bears losses were last year with a QB that struggled to throw for 150 yards a game.


Fields averaged about 247 yards of total offense per game last year.

Will Williams be able to surpass that?


We're about 10 days away. What do you think? What are your expectations?

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80198
The Hawk wrote:
denisdman wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Pretty weak draft scenario for the Bear's. they went from a terrific bounty from their number one pick to having 4 fucking picks in the entire draft. All for a short contact adverse quarterback from a university with a piss poor track record of "developing generational quarterbacks".

Now NASty is having conniptions about the two best receivers on the BEARS being Over-rated and too old. And they havent' improved their offensive line, defensive backfield, tight end, and defensive end spots. All the draft picks which the smart trade of the number one pick would have given them. What a "deal" they turned down.


You do not like the signings at center and safety? They added a tight end too. I feel like the Bears made solid moves so far.


No I don't. They had the chance at getting an OT and WR in the first round. A TE in rd 3 and a DE in Rd 2 and a C in the 4th Rd. In my opinion, Poles "settled" at the additions you mentioned in my knowledge of the players they added/ I may be wrong. Its happened before. :wink: :wink:


They signed a TE with 109 receptions the last two years to be their TE2. They signed a former pro bowl safety who never misses games and is good at causing turnovers. They also signed a guy with a lot of starts under his belt to back him up at safety.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 10:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14375
pizza_Place: Grazianos
good dolphin wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
denisdman wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Pretty weak draft scenario for the Bear's. they went from a terrific bounty from their number one pick to having 4 fucking picks in the entire draft. All for a short contact adverse quarterback from a university with a piss poor track record of "developing generational quarterbacks".

Now NASty is having conniptions about the two best receivers on the BEARS being Over-rated and too old. And they havent' improved their offensive line, defensive backfield, tight end, and defensive end spots. All the draft picks which the smart trade of the number one pick would have given them. What a "deal" they turned down.


You do not like the signings at center and safety? They added a tight end too. I feel like the Bears made solid moves so far.


No I don't. They had the chance at getting an OT and WR in the first round. A TE in rd 3 and a DE in Rd 2 and a C in the 4th Rd. In my opinion, Poles "settled" at the additions you mentioned in my knowledge of the players they added/ I may be wrong. Its happened before. :wink: :wink:


They signed a TE with 109 receptions the last two years to be their TE2. They signed a former pro bowl safety who never misses games and is good at causing turnovers. They also signed a guy with a lot of starts under his belt to back him up at safety.


I don't know. The older safeties can suddenly become big liabilities. Eddie was a pro bowl guy who became said liability did he not? I was hoping for the tight end from Texas in the 3rd rd. He would have been a terrific addition.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2024 6:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80198
The Hawk wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
denisdman wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Pretty weak draft scenario for the Bear's. they went from a terrific bounty from their number one pick to having 4 fucking picks in the entire draft. All for a short contact adverse quarterback from a university with a piss poor track record of "developing generational quarterbacks".

Now NASty is having conniptions about the two best receivers on the BEARS being Over-rated and too old. And they havent' improved their offensive line, defensive backfield, tight end, and defensive end spots. All the draft picks which the smart trade of the number one pick would have given them. What a "deal" they turned down.


You do not like the signings at center and safety? They added a tight end too. I feel like the Bears made solid moves so far.


No I don't. They had the chance at getting an OT and WR in the first round. A TE in rd 3 and a DE in Rd 2 and a C in the 4th Rd. In my opinion, Poles "settled" at the additions you mentioned in my knowledge of the players they added/ I may be wrong. Its happened before. :wink: :wink:


They signed a TE with 109 receptions the last two years to be their TE2. They signed a former pro bowl safety who never misses games and is good at causing turnovers. They also signed a guy with a lot of starts under his belt to back him up at safety.


I don't know. The older safeties can suddenly become big liabilities. Eddie was a pro bowl guy who became said liability did he not? I was hoping for the tight end from Texas in the 3rd rd. He would have been a terrific addition.



Eddie was a 4th round draft pick because he came into the league injured. We got everything we could have possibly expected out of of a 4th rounder and then the injuries piled up. It wasn't age that got him.

Byard has pretty much never been injured. However, that guy they took from the packers is pretty good depth if something freakish happens in Byard's career.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2024 8:34 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 27822
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
NME wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
NME wrote:
As for the Bears, there will be growing pains at QB -there’s a reason why what Stroud did is so rare.. but 9 wins should be fairly easy to come by considering how close some of the Bears losses were last year with a QB that struggled to throw for 150 yards a game.


Fields averaged about 247 yards of total offense per game last year.

Will Williams be able to surpass that?




I think if he throws for that amount per game or close to that it will open up the run game for the backs more instead of the QB needing to eat up those rushing yards.. and yes I think it’s possible for him to have a total average that matches my or exceeds that. Especially with as much of a ‘thrower’ he is. And of course, Williams can scramble too


Also, I think Fields was around total 225 per game.. that’s very doable


He played in 13 games last year and had 3219 total yards for an average of 247.6 yards/game.

Let's hope Waldron eases Williams into things by incorporating plays and concepts from the USC offense.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2024 8:45 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77179
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Tall Midget wrote:
NME wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
NME wrote:
As for the Bears, there will be growing pains at QB -there’s a reason why what Stroud did is so rare.. but 9 wins should be fairly easy to come by considering how close some of the Bears losses were last year with a QB that struggled to throw for 150 yards a game.


Fields averaged about 247 yards of total offense per game last year.

Will Williams be able to surpass that?




I think if he throws for that amount per game or close to that it will open up the run game for the backs more instead of the QB needing to eat up those rushing yards.. and yes I think it’s possible for him to have a total average that matches my or exceeds that. Especially with as much of a ‘thrower’ he is. And of course, Williams can scramble too


Also, I think Fields was around total 225 per game.. that’s very doable


He played in 13 games last year and had 3219 total yards for an average of 247.6 yards/game.

Let's hope Waldron eases Williams into things by incorporating plays and concepts from the USC offense.


Other than some read option things, I hope he ignores that playbook. Every former professional quarterback who watched it his film was puzzled by the route concepts and the things Alm18ghty Caleb was asked to do.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group