It is currently Mon Jun 17, 2024 8:57 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 87 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:14 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77663
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
That's not even going into the significant speed/strength advantage every guy I listed has over Sikma.


There it is. The "slow, tiny, white" canard.

I never said white, or tiny. He was tall. He was not particularly strong. Are you saying he was faster and stronger than anyone I mentioned? He was a better shooter than pretty much all of them.


He was strong as fuck. Why don't you look at the guys he had to guard night in and night out. He'd beat the living fuck out of Joakim Noah.

_________________
Communists are just people who are terrible at capitalism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72296
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The pace of play argument is silly. Sikma scored twice as much as Tyson Chandler and you're chalking the difference up to "pace of play". Do you also believe that David West was a better scorer than Jordan? Pace of play.

You shoulda said Baylor. Jordan is a terrible analogy.

So you're telling me that a guy that averages 16-10 in a 240 possession game will get those same numbers, or very close to, in a 160 possession game? I find that hard to believe.

I think we'd agree Wilt would be the best center in the league if dropped in today. But do you think he would also average 50 ppg or 25 rpg? This is just common sense stuff. It's not silly, a strawman, a canard, or whatever other device you're going for.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:08 pm
Posts: 2139
pizza_Place: Lucano's
RFDC wrote:
I hate when that canard is played.


:lol:

Nice.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72296
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
That's not even going into the significant speed/strength advantage every guy I listed has over Sikma.


There it is. The "slow, tiny, white" canard.

I never said white, or tiny. He was tall. He was not particularly strong. Are you saying he was faster and stronger than anyone I mentioned? He was a better shooter than pretty much all of them.


He was strong as fuck. Why don't you look at the guys he had to guard night in and night out. He'd beat the living fuck out of Joakim Noah.

:lol:

Agree to disagree. I must have seen unusual games/footage of Sikma. He didn't seem to be an enforcer from what I saw.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23917
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Jack Sikma could do everything. Pass, shoot, score inside, rebound like a bitch. He was not slow. Put him on the NBA steroid plan and he'd be a top 5 center today w/o question.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 56022
Clearly Sikma could play today, but to say he would beat the fuck out of Noah is a stretch

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:27 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77663
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The pace of play argument is silly. Sikma scored twice as much as Tyson Chandler and you're chalking the difference up to "pace of play". Do you also believe that David West was a better scorer than Jordan? Pace of play.

You shoulda said Baylor. Jordan is a terrible analogy.

So you're telling me that a guy that averages 16-10 in a 240 possession game will get those same numbers, or very close to, in a 160 possession game? I find that hard to believe.

I think we'd agree Wilt would be the best center in the league if dropped in today. But do you think he would also average 50 ppg or 25 rpg? This is just common sense stuff. It's not silly, a strawman, a canard, or whatever other device you're going for.


It's funny how guys your age think every guy from the past would be a lesser player today except somehow Jordan is the exception. Nike. The power of advertising.

_________________
Communists are just people who are terrible at capitalism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:30 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77663
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
RFDC wrote:
Clearly Sikma could play today, but to say he would beat the fuck out of Noah is a stretch


Do you consider Noah to be a particularly strong player? Sikma held his own against Jabbar, Moses Malone, Robert Parrish, Wes Unseld, etc. Who are the Hall of Famers that Tyson Chandler guards?

_________________
Communists are just people who are terrible at capitalism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 56022
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Clearly Sikma could play today, but to say he would beat the fuck out of Noah is a stretch


Do you consider Noah to be a particularly strong player? Sikma held his own against Jabbar, Moses Malone, Robert Parrish, Wes Unseld, etc. Who are the Hall of Famers that Tyson Chandler guards?


I am not arguing that Sikma didn't do those things. I am for the most part in agreement with you, just don't think he would be this physical dominating presence inside that would beat the fuck out of any of the current centers.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68609
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Jack Sikma is decidedly better than Tyson Chandler. Same with Horford. That shouldn't even be a real debate.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72296
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The pace of play argument is silly. Sikma scored twice as much as Tyson Chandler and you're chalking the difference up to "pace of play". Do you also believe that David West was a better scorer than Jordan? Pace of play.

You shoulda said Baylor. Jordan is a terrible analogy.

So you're telling me that a guy that averages 16-10 in a 240 possession game will get those same numbers, or very close to, in a 160 possession game? I find that hard to believe.

I think we'd agree Wilt would be the best center in the league if dropped in today. But do you think he would also average 50 ppg or 25 rpg? This is just common sense stuff. It's not silly, a strawman, a canard, or whatever other device you're going for.


It's funny how guys your age think every guy from the past would be a lesser player today except somehow Jordan is the exception. Nike. The power of advertising.


You know that's bullshit though. Did you not just hear me say Wilt would be the best still today? Jerry West would be unbelievable good too. Ditto with Baylor. And Russell. I dont think Cousy could handle the PGs today, but maybe if he grew up in the same environment that stressed dribbling fundamentals he could. Sam Jones could definitely be a good player today.

The "Guys your age blah blah blah" is just a sweeping, inaccurate, terrible way of saying "I am losing this argument so I'll just make shit up I guess at this point."

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23917
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Sikma held his own against Jabbar, Moses Malone, Robert Parrish, Wes Unseld, etc. Who are the Hall of Famers that Tyson Chandler guards?


He more than held his own. Seven time all-star.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:37 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77663
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
RFDC wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Clearly Sikma could play today, but to say he would beat the fuck out of Noah is a stretch


Do you consider Noah to be a particularly strong player? Sikma held his own against Jabbar, Moses Malone, Robert Parrish, Wes Unseld, etc. Who are the Hall of Famers that Tyson Chandler guards?


I am not arguing that Sikma didn't do those things. I am for the most part in agreement with you, just don't think he would be this physical dominating presence inside that would beat the fuck out of any of the current centers.


What I'm saying is that Sikma was a big, strong dude and exceptionally agile for a big man. The game is different today and not because people evolved. The "training" methods are different. I think we can assume that guys of the past would use those methods were they playing today.

_________________
Communists are just people who are terrible at capitalism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72296
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Jack Sikma is decidedly better than Tyson Chandler. Same with Horford. That shouldn't even be a real debate.

Sikma is much better offensively. Chandler is much better defensively. I already explained why total rpg doesn't work well as a comparable. But TR% does. That's the total amount of rebounds you grabbed out of the ones available. Sikma's career high for one season is 18.0, Chandler's is 20.7. Chandler's career average is 18.3. Chandler was the better rebounder and better defender. Sikma was a better offensive player. Chandler was a better overall player.

(slaps Bagels hand to make Horford's case)

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:39 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77663
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The pace of play argument is silly. Sikma scored twice as much as Tyson Chandler and you're chalking the difference up to "pace of play". Do you also believe that David West was a better scorer than Jordan? Pace of play.

You shoulda said Baylor. Jordan is a terrible analogy.

So you're telling me that a guy that averages 16-10 in a 240 possession game will get those same numbers, or very close to, in a 160 possession game? I find that hard to believe.

I think we'd agree Wilt would be the best center in the league if dropped in today. But do you think he would also average 50 ppg or 25 rpg? This is just common sense stuff. It's not silly, a strawman, a canard, or whatever other device you're going for.


It's funny how guys your age think every guy from the past would be a lesser player today except somehow Jordan is the exception. Nike. The power of advertising.


You know that's bullshit though. Did you not just hear me say Wilt would be the best still today? Jerry West would be unbelievable good too. Ditto with Baylor. And Russell. I dont think Cousy could handle the PGs today, but maybe if he grew up in the same environment that stressed dribbling fundamentals he could. Sam Jones could definitely be a good player today.

The "Guys your age blah blah blah" is just a sweeping, inaccurate, terrible way of saying "I am losing this argument so I'll just make shit up I guess at this point."


Well then, if Chandler's 8 ppg are better than Sikma's 16 based on "pace of play" wht wouldn't David West's 15 be better than Jordan's 30? By the way, I'm pretty sure I'm not losing this argument.

_________________
Communists are just people who are terrible at capitalism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:40 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77663
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Jack Sikma is decidedly better than Tyson Chandler. Same with Horford. That shouldn't even be a real debate.

Sikma is much better offensively. Chandler is much better defensively. I already explained why total rpg doesn't work well as a comparable. But TR% does. That's the total amount of rebounds you grabbed out of the ones available. Sikma's career high for one season is 18.0, Chandler's is 20.7. Chandler's career average is 18.3. Chandler was the better rebounder and better defender. Sikma was a better offensive player. Chandler was a better overall player.

(slaps Bagels hand to make Horford's case)


Who are the Hall of Famers that Chandler guards?

_________________
Communists are just people who are terrible at capitalism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68609
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Jack Sikma is decidedly better than Tyson Chandler. Same with Horford. That shouldn't even be a real debate.

Sikma is much better offensively. Chandler is much better defensively. I already explained why total rpg doesn't work well as a comparable. But TR% does. That's the total amount of rebounds you grabbed out of the ones available. Sikma's career high for one season is 18.0, Chandler's is 20.7. Chandler's career average is 18.3. Chandler was the better rebounder and better defender. Sikma was a better offensive player. Chandler was a better overall player.

(slaps Bagels hand to make Horford's case)


We will again disagree.

Enjoy the Black Hills.

Or is that South Dakota?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72296
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Clearly Sikma could play today, but to say he would beat the fuck out of Noah is a stretch


Do you consider Noah to be a particularly strong player? Sikma held his own against Jabbar, Moses Malone, Robert Parrish, Wes Unseld, etc. Who are the Hall of Famers that Tyson Chandler guards?

Noah weighs more than Sikma did.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:42 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77663
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Clearly Sikma could play today, but to say he would beat the fuck out of Noah is a stretch


Do you consider Noah to be a particularly strong player? Sikma held his own against Jabbar, Moses Malone, Robert Parrish, Wes Unseld, etc. Who are the Hall of Famers that Tyson Chandler guards?

Noah weighs more than Sikma did.


I can't speak to that. I've never weighed them.

_________________
Communists are just people who are terrible at capitalism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72296
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Terry's Peeps wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Jack Sikma is decidedly better than Tyson Chandler. Same with Horford. That shouldn't even be a real debate.

Sikma is much better offensively. Chandler is much better defensively. I already explained why total rpg doesn't work well as a comparable. But TR% does. That's the total amount of rebounds you grabbed out of the ones available. Sikma's career high for one season is 18.0, Chandler's is 20.7. Chandler's career average is 18.3. Chandler was the better rebounder and better defender. Sikma was a better offensive player. Chandler was a better overall player.

(slaps Bagels hand to make Horford's case)


We will again disagree.

Enjoy the Black Hills.

Or is that South Dakota?


I dont know what the black hills are. I'm already enjoying it up here. I start work tomorrow making a little more than twice what I was making in Texas.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72296
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Clearly Sikma could play today, but to say he would beat the fuck out of Noah is a stretch


Do you consider Noah to be a particularly strong player? Sikma held his own against Jabbar, Moses Malone, Robert Parrish, Wes Unseld, etc. Who are the Hall of Famers that Tyson Chandler guards?

Noah weighs more than Sikma did.


I can't speak to that. I've never weighed them.

Fortunately for you and I, the NBA did.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:44 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77663
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Jack Sikma is decidedly better than Tyson Chandler. Same with Horford. That shouldn't even be a real debate.

Sikma is much better offensively. Chandler is much better defensively. I already explained why total rpg doesn't work well as a comparable. But TR% does. That's the total amount of rebounds you grabbed out of the ones available. Sikma's career high for one season is 18.0, Chandler's is 20.7. Chandler's career average is 18.3. Chandler was the better rebounder and better defender. Sikma was a better offensive player. Chandler was a better overall player.

(slaps Bagels hand to make Horford's case)


We will again disagree.

Enjoy the Black Hills.

Or is that South Dakota?


I dont know what the black hills are. I'm already enjoying it up here. I start work tomorrow making a little more than twice what I was making in Texas.


You left a Tyson Chandler job for a Jack Sikma job. Congratulations!

_________________
Communists are just people who are terrible at capitalism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72296
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Jack Sikma is decidedly better than Tyson Chandler. Same with Horford. That shouldn't even be a real debate.

Sikma is much better offensively. Chandler is much better defensively. I already explained why total rpg doesn't work well as a comparable. But TR% does. That's the total amount of rebounds you grabbed out of the ones available. Sikma's career high for one season is 18.0, Chandler's is 20.7. Chandler's career average is 18.3. Chandler was the better rebounder and better defender. Sikma was a better offensive player. Chandler was a better overall player.

(slaps Bagels hand to make Horford's case)


Who are the Hall of Famers that Chandler guards?

You cant hold it against him who he plays against. He won DPOY last year, and I believe was runner up the year before. Just because Sikma played against Kareem, does not mean he played him particularly well. From what I understand Sikma was not considered a very good defensive player. Is that false?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23917
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Defense wasn't his forte, but he put in a workman-like effort. Big ass guys like moses malone would cause him problems, but then again he couldn't guard Sikma either.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81627
The Dream Team would be average players if they played today


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
So.....Biggie says he won more money than some people make in a year.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 28875
spanky wrote:
So.....Biggie says he won more money than some people make in a year.

You're pretty swift and catch on fast.






:P

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89521
Location: To the left of my post
spanky wrote:
So.....Biggie says he won more money than some people make in a year.
He needs to rate that on a scale of IMU to Dr. Ken for it to have meaning.

I won more money than the board housewives make in a year in Omaha once.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 3:49 pm
Posts: 9340
Location: UM?
pizza_Place: Aurelios
FF not to be a dick here but you were maybe 5 by the time Sikma retired from the league yet you're posting like you watched hours and hours of his games.

_________________
Hank Scorpio wrote:
What the hell, I would. Post op is OK right? Right?!?!?!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack Sikma
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81627
KS, why not trade up to Carrie Underwood?

I saw her CD being sold the other day at a Gas station. She's way hotter.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 87 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group