Chicago Fanatics Message Board http://chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Rosemont protesters http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=108488 |
Page 2 of 3 |
Author: | Douchebag [ Sun Sep 17, 2017 2:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
Killer V wrote: She looked incredibly wasted on the vids that were released. I bet she walked in and found it nice and cool, then passed out. This would be my theory as well. |
Author: | Nas [ Sun Sep 17, 2017 2:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
312player wrote: badrogue17 wrote: Do people in general have a right to demand information during police investigations in the first place ? That's what irritating, the balls to demand answers 3 days after your dumbass daughter killed herself. The cops had to watch like 30 hours of surveillance clips and this ignorant west side shit bag is demanding the FBI get involved. This post is littered with... |
Author: | Joe Bore Ode [ Sun Sep 17, 2017 2:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
Some of you are really cold in your assessment of this, and I would you'd all chill out until the facts are known. |
Author: | Douchebag [ Sun Sep 17, 2017 2:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
Author: | Joe Bore Ode [ Sun Sep 17, 2017 2:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
Douchebag wrote: |
Author: | Score is doomed [ Sun Sep 17, 2017 7:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
shakes wrote: Killer V wrote: Jaw Breaker wrote: The story is pretty gruesome. If the freezer was operating at normal temp, would she have been frozen solid when they found her? It would have been bad enough for the mother to see her after drowning in a pool, but this is bizarre. Now they're saying the party itself was booked using a stolen identity and credit card. How stupid can you be? If true, would that negate any lawsuit, since she was there under illegal circumstances? . No. Property owners have a duty to keep their property free of hazards and to protect people on their property, even those that are trespassing. It's the reason we are no longer allowed to set up spring guns in our yards to shoot burglars. /first week of law school You don't mind if I check with the Constitutional Scholar, JDC, to see if you are correct? |
Author: | badrogue17 [ Sun Sep 17, 2017 7:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
Score is doomed wrote: shakes wrote: Killer V wrote: Jaw Breaker wrote: The story is pretty gruesome. If the freezer was operating at normal temp, would she have been frozen solid when they found her? It would have been bad enough for the mother to see her after drowning in a pool, but this is bizarre. Now they're saying the party itself was booked using a stolen identity and credit card. How stupid can you be? If true, would that negate any lawsuit, since she was there under illegal circumstances? . No. Property owners have a duty to keep their property free of hazards and to protect people on their property, even those that are trespassing. It's the reason we are no longer allowed to set up spring guns in our yards to shoot burglars. /first week of law school You don't mind if I check with the Constitutional Scholar, JDC, to see if you are correct? |
Author: | 312player [ Sun Sep 17, 2017 8:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
I'm assuming it's pitch black in a freezer, how could you see the release? |
Author: | leashyourkids [ Sun Sep 17, 2017 8:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
badrogue17 wrote: Score is doomed wrote: shakes wrote: Killer V wrote: Jaw Breaker wrote: The story is pretty gruesome. If the freezer was operating at normal temp, would she have been frozen solid when they found her? It would have been bad enough for the mother to see her after drowning in a pool, but this is bizarre. Now they're saying the party itself was booked using a stolen identity and credit card. How stupid can you be? If true, would that negate any lawsuit, since she was there under illegal circumstances? . No. Property owners have a duty to keep their property free of hazards and to protect people on their property, even those that are trespassing. It's the reason we are no longer allowed to set up spring guns in our yards to shoot burglars. /first week of law school You don't mind if I check with the Constitutional Scholar, JDC, to see if you are correct? It's crazy. I deal with a bit of liability cases, so shakes would know way more, but there are different levels of duties owed to different parties, even if that party is a tresspasser, as shakes alluded to. Depending on the state, they could be found to be only a percentage responsible (contributory negligence), but that percentage could still be a ton of money with someone's life. I would imagine the argument would go something like... - Hotel has a duty to lock all freezers to prevent any guests from entering - Hotel did not - Guest enters - The hotel failing to lock their freezers contributed to her death |
Author: | newper [ Sun Sep 17, 2017 9:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
leashyourkids wrote: - Hotel has a duty to lock all freezers to prevent any guests from entering - Hotel did not - Guest enters - The hotel failing to lock their freezers contributed to her death Exactly -- hotel has an obligation to restrict entrance to closed areas, etc. They can put the hotel's role in her death at 10% and then have some sort of a payout for that. Presumably the real issue is who let her drink/gave her drugs/drugged her to the point of this wandering stupor. If they charge drug dealers for manslaughter when their buyers die from their product, they can work up a similar charge to some of those at the party. |
Author: | Nas [ Sun Sep 17, 2017 9:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
I don't want friends like hers. |
Author: | Ogie Oglethorpe [ Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
Urlacher's missing neck wrote: how did he die in the electrical room? It not like the voltage monsters are there handing you lightening bolts? You have to take off cover after cover after cover and then bond yourself to some line voltage and ground. That's a lot of work sober. https://news.uns.purdue.edu/x/2007a/070 ... effey.html The dorm in question was built in the 50s. |
Author: | Urlacher's missing neck [ Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
I don't think you can put locks on freezers......so people can't lock you in. |
Author: | badrogue17 [ Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
Urlacher's missing neck wrote: I don't think you can put locks on freezers......so people can't lock you in. They should put heaters in there . |
Author: | Urlacher's missing neck [ Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
The lighting is interesting. I installed the wiring for a cooler and a freezer last week. The light switch for the cooler was in the inside due to convenience. The freezer has 2 doors so it just had 3 way switches at the outside of each door. Now there were door switches that would open or close as the door opened and you could have that trigger the lights either way. I would just leave the things on 24-7. |
Author: | SuperMario [ Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
newper wrote: leashyourkids wrote: - Hotel has a duty to lock all freezers to prevent any guests from entering - Hotel did not - Guest enters - The hotel failing to lock their freezers contributed to her death Exactly -- hotel has an obligation to restrict entrance to closed areas, etc. They can put the hotel's role in her death at 10% and then have some sort of a payout for that. Presumably the real issue is who let her drink/gave her drugs/drugged her to the point of this wandering stupor. If they charge drug dealers for manslaughter when their buyers die from their product, they can work up a similar charge to some of those at the party. Except Illinois is a 50% Modified Comparative Negligence Venue technically meaning the defendant, the hotel, would need to be at least 50% liable for fault to be found. As others have said, though, they or their insurance carrier would likely offer a settlement before getting to that point. I am a liability claims examiner and in uber liberal Cook county, most defendants settle instead of chancing it with a jury verdict. |
Author: | shakes [ Mon Sep 18, 2017 3:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
There will definitely be some comparative fault on Frosty's end, but in the end the hotel has a duty to keep its premises safe from hazards. If Frosty can wander aimlessly and hammered through the hotel and somehow find her way into an abandoned and unlocked freezer that's a serious problem with the hotel. Hotel is well aware that they have a lot of inebriated guests and visitors on their premises and have a duty to make sure its not possible for something like that to happen. |
Author: | shakes [ Mon Sep 18, 2017 3:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
Additionally the fact that the mom was at the hotel Saturday morning pounding on doors looking for her daughter and the hotel responded by calling 911 on her is not going to look good at all, especially if it can be determined that the daughter might've still been alive at that point. |
Author: | Nas [ Mon Sep 18, 2017 3:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
I'm sure they have insurance for this so they're fine. There are some things money can replace. |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Mon Sep 18, 2017 3:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
shakes wrote: There will definitely be some comparative fault on Frosty's end, but in the end the hotel has a duty to keep its premises safe from hazards. If Frosty can wander aimlessly and hammered through the hotel and somehow find her way into an abandoned and unlocked freezer that's a serious problem with the hotel. Hotel is well aware that they have a lot of inebriated guests and visitors on their premises and have a duty to make sure its not possible for something like that to happen. Hate to admit it but this made me |
Author: | SuperMario [ Tue Sep 19, 2017 7:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
Nas wrote: I'm sure they have insurance for this so they're fine. There are some things money can replace. They could be self-insured up to a certain amount. Large companies and corporations often are. Then they would be paying likely some or all of any potential settlement. |
Author: | TurdFerguson [ Tue Sep 19, 2017 7:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
Nas wrote: I'm sure they have insurance for this so they're fine. There are some things money can replace. They can just write it off. |
Author: | ontiveros [ Tue Sep 19, 2017 11:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
TurdFerguson wrote: Nas wrote: I'm sure they have insurance for this so they're fine. There are some things money can replace. They can just write it off. you don't even know what a write-off is. |
Author: | Juiced [ Tue Sep 19, 2017 11:36 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
They need to let it go! You too IMU... |
Author: | Panther pislA [ Tue Sep 19, 2017 12:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
Killer V wrote: Jaw Breaker wrote: The story is pretty gruesome. If the freezer was operating at normal temp, would she have been frozen solid when they found her? It would have been bad enough for the mother to see her after drowning in a pool, but this is bizarre. Now they're saying the party itself was booked using a stolen identity and credit card. How stupid can you be? If true, would that negate any lawsuit, since she was there under illegal circumstances? She looked incredibly wasted on the vids that were released. I bet she walked in and found it nice and cool, then passed out. I've never done ecstasy or any man-made drugs, but I have been out at the clubs when others were, and the prevailing theme is that the body overheats greatly, and they feel a compelling need to drink loads and loads of water and juice. Agreed - she probably was feeling ultra hot due to the drugs and enjoyed the relief of the cool freezer so much she passed out. End of story. |
Author: | good dolphin [ Tue Sep 19, 2017 2:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
I guess I don't understand the need for a community wide protest on this issue. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Sep 19, 2017 2:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
good dolphin wrote: I guess I don't understand the need for a community wide protest on this issue. If it was a polish girl, you'd be leading the chants. Course if she were polish, she'd never have been able to get the door open anyway. Woulda just stood there pushing. |
Author: | good dolphin [ Tue Sep 19, 2017 2:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
rogers park bryan wrote: good dolphin wrote: I guess I don't understand the need for a community wide protest on this issue. If it was a polish girl, you'd be leading the chants. Course if she were polish, she'd never have been able to get the door open anyway. Woulda just stood there pushing. Chants against what? I know you were just using it to set up the joke. |
Author: | Nas [ Tue Sep 19, 2017 3:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
good dolphin wrote: I guess I don't understand the need for a community wide protest on this issue. There's a conspiracy surrounding her death. #StayWoke Others feel like the mother was dismissed because she is black and has been attacked for being black and probably poor. Looking at some of the earlier posts in this thread I can see why they may feel that way. |
Author: | Joe Bore Ode [ Wed Sep 20, 2017 7:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Rosemont protesters |
Yeti is missing a real chance at a great B2B deal here. |
Page 2 of 3 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |