That's a man, man.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board http://chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Hayley Geftman-Gold http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=108783 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Franky T [ Mon Oct 02, 2017 7:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Hayley Geftman-Gold |
I guess those 59 people killed in Vegas had it coming according to this piece of trash. Quote: "I’m actually not even sympathetic bc country music fans often are Republican gun toters.”
|
|
| Author: | Peoria Matt [ Mon Oct 02, 2017 7:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
Who? |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Mon Oct 02, 2017 7:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
Yeah, definitely not ALL of them. |
|
| Author: | Don Tiny [ Mon Oct 02, 2017 7:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
I didn't realize it was a country "music" concert ... at least some good news came out of this. |
|
| Author: | ToxicMasculinity [ Mon Oct 02, 2017 8:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.busine ... ld-2017-10 Life comes at you fast. |
|
| Author: | Darkside [ Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
That's a hot take. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
I'll bet she gets compliments on the hyphen. |
|
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
Why Democrats don't win. |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Mon Oct 02, 2017 10:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
She's kinda cute. Would. |
|
| Author: | Chus [ Mon Oct 02, 2017 10:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
That's a man, man.
|
|
| Author: | SuperMario [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 7:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
Seriously. She is a vice president and senior counsel to CBS. Normally lawyers advise other dumb corporate stooges from making statements like this. Not do it themselves. How dumb is this lady? |
|
| Author: | Peoria Matt [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 7:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
SuperMario wrote: Seriously. She is a vice president and senior counsel to CBS. Normally lawyers advise other dumb corporate stooges from making statements like this. Not do it themselves. How dumb is this lady? She was a VP. Fired pretty quickly after the shit hit the fan. She's pretty dumb. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 7:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
Maybe JORR is right after all. |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 8:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
Peoria Matt wrote: SuperMario wrote: Seriously. She is a vice president and senior counsel to CBS. Normally lawyers advise other dumb corporate stooges from making statements like this. Not do it themselves. How dumb is this lady? She was a VP. Fired pretty quickly after the shit hit the fan. She's pretty dumb. IMHO, this stuff is what happens when people start to believe too much in the current climate. Regardless of what that climate is. This year it is very out in the open to resist and oppose from a left point of view. If all you hear and see around you are people feeling free to spout whatever comes into their minds they drop their guard and oops. You are fired. |
|
| Author: | shakes [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 9:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
Curious Hair wrote: Why Democrats don't win. yep, 100%. And the best part is 99% of them haven't "woke" to that obvious statement yet so they keep piling it on. |
|
| Author: | IMU [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 10:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
Curious Hair wrote: Why Democrats don't win. 2 of the last 3 Presidential elections were won by a Democrat, and I am willing to bet the midterm elections will lean left. The country goes back and forth, and has for years. Nothing randoms say will change that. |
|
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 10:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
The Democrats have faced unprecedented losses in this decade. Yes, they can win the White House, because that seems to be all they care about now, and cultural liberalism is doing great, but the Democratic Party in its current form is failing miserably at electoral politics. |
|
| Author: | Ogie Oglethorpe [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 10:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
Curious Hair wrote: The Democrats have faced unprecedented losses in this decade. Yes, they can win the White House, because that seems to be all they care about now, and cultural liberalism is doing great, but the Democratic Party in its current form is failing miserably at electoral politics. I feel like the Twitter echo chamber has killed the Democrat Party more than anything. It has put them in a bubble where they feed off of their worst ideas without getting a sense of how those ideas play to the general electoral public. The Democrat Party has so many built in advantages to win elections that it isn't even funny, but they toss them away for crap that the blue checkmarks push. All they had to do was give lip service to the rust belt and their blue wall, which held for 24 years, would've ensured an electoral college victory. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 10:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote: Curious Hair wrote: The Democrats have faced unprecedented losses in this decade. Yes, they can win the White House, because that seems to be all they care about now, and cultural liberalism is doing great, but the Democratic Party in its current form is failing miserably at electoral politics. I feel like the Twitter echo chamber has killed the Democrat Party more than anything. It has put them in a bubble where they feed off of their worst ideas without getting a sense of how those ideas play to the general electoral public. The Democrat Party has so many built in advantages to win elections that it isn't even funny, but they toss them away for crap that the blue checkmarks push. What are the built in advantages? |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 10:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
rogers park bryan wrote: Ogie Oglethorpe wrote: Curious Hair wrote: The Democrats have faced unprecedented losses in this decade. Yes, they can win the White House, because that seems to be all they care about now, and cultural liberalism is doing great, but the Democratic Party in its current form is failing miserably at electoral politics. I feel like the Twitter echo chamber has killed the Democrat Party more than anything. It has put them in a bubble where they feed off of their worst ideas without getting a sense of how those ideas play to the general electoral public. The Democrat Party has so many built in advantages to win elections that it isn't even funny, but they toss them away for crap that the blue checkmarks push. What are the built in advantages? There's more poor / middle class people than rich ? |
|
| Author: | Ogie Oglethorpe [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 10:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
rogers park bryan wrote: Ogie Oglethorpe wrote: Curious Hair wrote: The Democrats have faced unprecedented losses in this decade. Yes, they can win the White House, because that seems to be all they care about now, and cultural liberalism is doing great, but the Democratic Party in its current form is failing miserably at electoral politics. I feel like the Twitter echo chamber has killed the Democrat Party more than anything. It has put them in a bubble where they feed off of their worst ideas without getting a sense of how those ideas play to the general electoral public. The Democrat Party has so many built in advantages to win elections that it isn't even funny, but they toss them away for crap that the blue checkmarks push. What are the built in advantages? I would say that despite the results of the 2016 election, Hillary had an advantage of the electoral college. If you looked at pollsters like Nate Silver, they considered it a strong possibility that Hillary could win the electoral college while losing the popular vote. This is due to the blue wall (PA, MI, WI). Those states had not gone blue in a generation and would've allowed Hillary to win, even if she lost Florida and Ohio. Hillary could have easily won those states (and any other Dem candidate not named Hillary would've certainly won all of the 5 above states) if they just had a reasonable economic platform that spoke to the blue collar voters in those states. That was the Democrat's bread and butter. Clinton and Obama each got 2 terms by speaking to those people, but Hillary ignored them. Trump spoke to them and outright lied to them, but by speaking to them he earned their vote. The blue checkmarks pretty much shit all over those people so Democrats running for office ignored them. |
|
| Author: | Hatchetman [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 10:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
badrogue17 wrote: [ There's more poor / middle class people than rich ? LOL. You'd think that might be something they would focus on. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 10:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
rogers park bryan wrote: Ogie Oglethorpe wrote: Curious Hair wrote: The Democrats have faced unprecedented losses in this decade. Yes, they can win the White House, because that seems to be all they care about now, and cultural liberalism is doing great, but the Democratic Party in its current form is failing miserably at electoral politics. I feel like the Twitter echo chamber has killed the Democrat Party more than anything. It has put them in a bubble where they feed off of their worst ideas without getting a sense of how those ideas play to the general electoral public. The Democrat Party has so many built in advantages to win elections that it isn't even funny, but they toss them away for crap that the blue checkmarks push. What are the built in advantages? |
|
| Author: | Cashman [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
rogers park bryan wrote: I'll bet she gets compliments on the hyphen. I never understood women who do this. |
|
| Author: | ToxicMasculinity [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
rogers park bryan wrote: Ogie Oglethorpe wrote: Curious Hair wrote: The Democrats have faced unprecedented losses in this decade. Yes, they can win the White House, because that seems to be all they care about now, and cultural liberalism is doing great, but the Democratic Party in its current form is failing miserably at electoral politics. I feel like the Twitter echo chamber has killed the Democrat Party more than anything. It has put them in a bubble where they feed off of their worst ideas without getting a sense of how those ideas play to the general electoral public. The Democrat Party has so many built in advantages to win elections that it isn't even funny, but they toss them away for crap that the blue checkmarks push. What are the built in advantages? Perpetual minority votes and a sympathetic mass media. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
The wealthy and those that have corporate interests are more republican leaning, correct? Doesnt their money offset many of these advantages? |
|
| Author: | Ogie Oglethorpe [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
rogers park bryan wrote: The wealthy and those that have corporate interests are more republican leaning, correct? Doesnt their money offset many of these advantages? Dems outspent the Republicans the last few cycles so no. |
|
| Author: | hnd [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
rogers park bryan wrote: The wealthy and those that have corporate interests are more republican leaning, correct? not necessarily. there is a lot of big business wrapped in "progressive" ideologies. corporations that feed off gvt intervention and regulation. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
Yea, as I typed that I was thinking of how much Hillary spent but I would guess it's still more on the other side when all elections are accounted for. Voter Id laws will help the right |
|
| Author: | Jbi11s [ Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hayley Geftman-Gold |
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: The wealthy and those that have corporate interests are more republican leaning, correct? Doesnt their money offset many of these advantages? Dems outspent the Republicans the last few cycles so no. The wealthy donate to both parties. Not equally for the most part. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|