It is currently Thu Apr 25, 2024 8:20 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Clinton & DNC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 7:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81627
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Why is it not treason for HRC if it was supposedly for Trump Jr?

http://nypost.com/2017/10/25/why-doesnt ... s-treason/

Was it treason for Don Jr.?

If so, then yes, treason for Hillary. Ball is in your court, pm.



No. The point is it wasn't treason for Junior or for Hillary. Some in the media and message boards only wanted it to be treason for Junior.

Ok, so this isnt a big deal at all?

Cool.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clinton & DNC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 8:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15018
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
I'd say treason for both .

Everybody Win!

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clinton & DNC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 8:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:02 am
Posts: 982
Location: Illini Inn
pizza_Place: Amato's
pittmike wrote:
Why is it not treason for HRC if it was supposedly for Trump Jr?

http://nypost.com/2017/10/25/why-doesnt ... s-treason/

Hiring an ex-British intelligence officer is not the same as meeting with Putin's bitch (or asking Putin's hackers for stolen emails). One is on OUR side. The other(s) are not. WTF people?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clinton & DNC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 8:44 am 
pittmike wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Nas wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Nas wrote:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/wikileaks-assange-says-he-rejected-overture-from-trump-linked-group-1508961298



Clinton caught in the act and people going "well, what about Trump". Sad.


Did you read your articles? You're really excited about all of this and I'm not sure you should be. #ButHillary


Sure I did. Any embarrassment of the Clintons is something to not let slip away. I do not have to pay attention to Trump. Others will not let that slip. Besides there is a big thread for him I am sure you know about.

You can't be serious right now. You are the king of "both sides do it" and are getting mad that people are pointing out #trumprussia in response to your Hillary ranting?

I guess it's symptomatic of true partisan believers like yourself. Because it's a GOP who the info is about, it doesn't matter if it's true, it just matters WHO PAID FOR IT??? (We mean after our guys stopped paying for it.). If opposition research is illegal then haul the congressional GOP in right now since that's all the 400 BENGHAZI!!! hearings were.



I think you meant to address that to Long Time Guy.

It's funny how dumbfounded you are trying to respond when I reply reasonably. No it was addressed to you.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clinton & DNC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 39735
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
https://www.yahoo.com/news/election-wat ... 20527.html

Election watchdog charges Clinton campaign filed 'false' reports on Trump dossier funding
Michael Isikoff 13 hours ago
Reactions Like Reblog on Tumblr Share Tweet Email

Hillary Clinton and Christopher Steele. with text from the Federal Election Commission complaint. (Photo illustration: Yahoo News; photos: Matt Rourke/AP, Victoria Jones/PA via AP)
An independent campaign watchdog group Wednesday filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission charging that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee filed “false” campaign disclosure reports that concealed payments to the private investigative firm that commissioned the controversial “dossier” on then candidate Donald Trump’s alleged ties to Russia.

The complaint by the Campaign Legal Center — a nonpartisan group with no ties to any political party — came shortly after President Trump, in an impromptu press conference on the White House lawn, called it a “disgrace” that Clinton’s campaign and the DNC paid for what he termed the “fake” dossier. He claimed the disclosure has “turned around” the multiple, ongoing investigations into possible links between his campaign and Moscow.

“So they made up the whole Russia hoax,” said Trump when asked about the disclosure about the Clinton campaign’s involvement in the dossier, which was first reported by the Washington Post. “Now … the hoax has turned around.”

The nine-page complaint by the campaign watchdog group says nothing about the veracity of the allegations in the dossier, a subject that is still being investigated by special counsel Robert Mueller and three congressional committees.

Instead, it focuses on how the dossier was paid for — through a prominent law firm, Perkins Coie, which hired the private investigative firm, Fusion GPS — and the failure of either the Clinton campaign or the DNC to report the actual purpose of these payments on their legally mandated campaign expenditure reports.

“The DNC and Hillary for America reported dozens of payments totaling millions of dollars to the law firm Perkins Cole with the purpose described as ‘Legal Services’ or ‘Legal and Compliance Consulting,’ when, in reality, at least some of those payments were earmarked for the firm Fusion GPS, with the purpose of conducting opposition research on Donald Trump,” the complaint by the Campaign Legal Center states. The complaint notes that the Clinton campaign made 37 payments to Perkins Cole totaling $5.6 million, and the DNC made 345 payments totaling $6.7 million.



Hillary Clinton, DNC reportedly tied to Trump dossier

A new report says Hillary Clinton's camp helped fund research that produced a dossier of allegations about Trump's ties to Russia. Yahoo Finance’s Alexis Christoforous and Jen Rogers breaks it all down.

“By failing to file accurate reports, the DNC and Hillary for America undermined the vital public information role that reporting is intended to serve,” the complaint states.

_________________
Brick wrote:
Biden is doing a GOOD job.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clinton & DNC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 39735
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Peter Puck wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Why is it not treason for HRC if it was supposedly for Trump Jr?

http://nypost.com/2017/10/25/why-doesnt ... s-treason/

Hiring an ex-British intelligence officer is not the same as meeting with Putin's bitch (or asking Putin's hackers for stolen emails). One is on OUR side. The other(s) are not. WTF people?


Whom did they think the ex-British intel officer was going to meet and work with?

_________________
Brick wrote:
Biden is doing a GOOD job.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clinton & DNC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81627
pittmike wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/election-watchdog-charges-clinton-campaign-filed-false-reports-trump-dossier-funding-001920527.html

Election watchdog charges Clinton campaign filed 'false' reports on Trump dossier funding
Michael Isikoff 13 hours ago
Reactions Like Reblog on Tumblr Share Tweet Email

Hillary Clinton and Christopher Steele. with text from the Federal Election Commission complaint. (Photo illustration: Yahoo News; photos: Matt Rourke/AP, Victoria Jones/PA via AP)
An independent campaign watchdog group Wednesday filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission charging that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee filed “false” campaign disclosure reports that concealed payments to the private investigative firm that commissioned the controversial “dossier” on then candidate Donald Trump’s alleged ties to Russia.

The complaint by the Campaign Legal Center — a nonpartisan group with no ties to any political party — came shortly after President Trump, in an impromptu press conference on the White House lawn, called it a “disgrace” that Clinton’s campaign and the DNC paid for what he termed the “fake” dossier. He claimed the disclosure has “turned around” the multiple, ongoing investigations into possible links between his campaign and Moscow.

“So they made up the whole Russia hoax,” said Trump when asked about the disclosure about the Clinton campaign’s involvement in the dossier, which was first reported by the Washington Post. “Now … the hoax has turned around.”

The nine-page complaint by the campaign watchdog group says nothing about the veracity of the allegations in the dossier, a subject that is still being investigated by special counsel Robert Mueller and three congressional committees.

Instead, it focuses on how the dossier was paid for — through a prominent law firm, Perkins Coie, which hired the private investigative firm, Fusion GPS — and the failure of either the Clinton campaign or the DNC to report the actual purpose of these payments on their legally mandated campaign expenditure reports.

“The DNC and Hillary for America reported dozens of payments totaling millions of dollars to the law firm Perkins Cole with the purpose described as ‘Legal Services’ or ‘Legal and Compliance Consulting,’ when, in reality, at least some of those payments were earmarked for the firm Fusion GPS, with the purpose of conducting opposition research on Donald Trump,” the complaint by the Campaign Legal Center states. The complaint notes that the Clinton campaign made 37 payments to Perkins Cole totaling $5.6 million, and the DNC made 345 payments totaling $6.7 million.



Hillary Clinton, DNC reportedly tied to Trump dossier

A new report says Hillary Clinton's camp helped fund research that produced a dossier of allegations about Trump's ties to Russia. Yahoo Finance’s Alexis Christoforous and Jen Rogers breaks it all down.

“By failing to file accurate reports, the DNC and Hillary for America undermined the vital public information role that reporting is intended to serve,” the complaint states.

I see why you cut off the article right there....




Campaign legal experts and consultants say it is not at all uncommon for candidates of both parties to conceal expenditures for opposition research by paying for it through law firms or outside consultants. “It’s a black hole,” said one Democratic opposition research specialist, who asked not to be identified, and whose work for campaigns has rarely been publicly disclosed.

Moreover, there is ample precedent — approved by the FEC — for such arrangements. Ever since Walter Mondale’s campaign for president in 1984, the FEC has permitted campaigns to report lump sum payments to campaign consultants, law firms and other vendors without identifying subcontractors or subvendors they may have hired, so long as the payments were for the same general purpose listed for the overall disbursement in the first place.


Last edited by rogers park bryan on Thu Oct 26, 2017 10:14 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clinton & DNC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68609
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
:lol:

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clinton & DNC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 10:23 am 
pittmike wrote:
Peter Puck wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Why is it not treason for HRC if it was supposedly for Trump Jr?

http://nypost.com/2017/10/25/why-doesnt ... s-treason/

Hiring an ex-British intelligence officer is not the same as meeting with Putin's bitch (or asking Putin's hackers for stolen emails). One is on OUR side. The other(s) are not. WTF people?


Whom did they think the ex-British intel officer was going to meet and work with?

Julian Assange? Trey Gowdy?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clinton & DNC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Baby McNown wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Peter Puck wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Why is it not treason for HRC if it was supposedly for Trump Jr?

http://nypost.com/2017/10/25/why-doesnt ... s-treason/

Hiring an ex-British intelligence officer is not the same as meeting with Putin's bitch (or asking Putin's hackers for stolen emails). One is on OUR side. The other(s) are not. WTF people?


Whom did they think the ex-British intel officer was going to meet and work with?

Julian Assange? Trey Gowdy?


Devin Nunes, Dana Rohrbacher or maybe that shitstain Tom Cotton

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clinton & DNC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:30 am
Posts: 1497
pizza_Place: Bianchis
Am I the only one here who doesn't give a shit one way or the other on the Russia/Trump/DNC/Clinton shit? Lock them all up or don't. Let's get back to important topics like corndogs and garage sales.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Ah, Lemonparty, the 8th sacrament.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clinton & DNC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15018
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
this is going great....

https://deadspin.com/italian-soccer-fan ... 1819876976

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clinton & DNC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54260
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
European antisemitism is really...well, "getting out of control" implies that it could ideally be kept to a controllable limit, which doesn't sound right, either. It's just really bad.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clinton & DNC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 39735
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
City of Fools wrote:


Is Clinton or the DNC doing that?

_________________
Brick wrote:
Biden is doing a GOOD job.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clinton & DNC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 22603
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Who would guess a team nicknamed SS Nazio, who had Paulo diCanio give the fascist salute after a game, would be so fascist.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clinton & DNC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19456
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Peter Puck wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Why is it not treason for HRC if it was supposedly for Trump Jr?

http://nypost.com/2017/10/25/why-doesnt ... s-treason/

Hiring an ex-British intelligence officer is not the same as meeting with Putin's bitch (or asking Putin's hackers for stolen emails). One is on OUR side. The other(s) are not. WTF people?


We locked people up for leaking shit to the Israelis so being allied to us is not relevant. If it is against the law it is a bad thing.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clinton & DNC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 5:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:02 am
Posts: 982
Location: Illini Inn
pizza_Place: Amato's
pittmike wrote:
Peter Puck wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Why is it not treason for HRC if it was supposedly for Trump Jr?

http://nypost.com/2017/10/25/why-doesnt ... s-treason/

Hiring an ex-British intelligence officer is not the same as meeting with Putin's bitch (or asking Putin's hackers for stolen emails). One is on OUR side. The other(s) are not. WTF people?


Whom did they think the ex-British intel officer was going to meet and work with?

He's a retired British spy who focused on Russia. He's undoubtedly still got sources in and out of the government. Really think he is scheduling meetings with Putin's blessing?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clinton & DNC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 5:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:02 am
Posts: 982
Location: Illini Inn
pizza_Place: Amato's
chaspoppcap wrote:
Peter Puck wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Why is it not treason for HRC if it was supposedly for Trump Jr?

http://nypost.com/2017/10/25/why-doesnt ... s-treason/

Hiring an ex-British intelligence officer is not the same as meeting with Putin's bitch (or asking Putin's hackers for stolen emails). One is on OUR side. The other(s) are not. WTF people?



We locked people up for leaking shit to the Israelis so being allied to us is not relevant. If it is against the law it is a bad thing.

What are you even talking about? The British guy was not leaking anything. He was gathering info on Trump for someone from the GOP and then for the DNC.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clinton & DNC
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 5:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:02 am
Posts: 982
Location: Illini Inn
pizza_Place: Amato's
So many low information voters. We get what we deserve.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group