Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?

The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.

With hasn’t he started a movie studio?

The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.

With hasn’t he started a movie studio?

The judge ruled his pay was “unfair to shareholders”…the same shareholders who saw their shares increase 20x from where they bought them.

Elon too busy calling into radio shows under aliases to defend Elon/himself and playing video games to do much actual work these days:

It's most likely his AI. I'm not exaggerating.

in any case, he's taking value out of the company. If it's enough to make a impact on operations, the shareholders will be the ones hurting.

Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?

A very smart man.

I guarantee shareholders would lose more than $55 billion — pretty much instantly — if Musk left the company.

I guarantee shareholders would lose more than $55 billion — pretty much instantly — if Musk left the company.

Yeah just look at how Apple has struggled since they lost the great Steve Jobs.

That woman should really be seen as the poster child for munchausen by proxy of children with possible leanings towards queerness. You can see the social/business status she is attempting to gain through them in that video. Having two children in the same family who identify is so statistically anomalous that it should raise everyone's eyebrows.

“There is no greater evidence of Musk’s status as a transaction-specific controller than the Board’s posture toward Musk during the process that led to the Grant,” McCormick wrote.

That plan had offered Musk the chance to secure 12 tranches of Tesla stock options, which would vest if the company’s market capitalization increased by $50 billion and Tesla achieved a revenue target.

“Was the richest person in the world overpaid?” asked McCormick in her decision.

“The stockholder plaintiff in this derivative lawsuit says so. He claims that Tesla, Inc.’s directors breached their fiduciary duties by awarding Elon Musk a performance-based equity-compensation plan.”

Put simply, neither the Compensation Committee nor the Board acted in the best interests of the Company when negotiating Musk’s compensation plan. In fact, there is barely any evidence of negotiations at all,” she wrote. “Rather than negotiate against Musk with the mindset of a third party, the Compensation Committee worked alongside him, almost as an advisory body.”