It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:16 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 159 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Canada
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2023 6:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 39749
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Out your fucking fires out up there already. Jesus, don't they have a Smokey The Bear program? There have to be moose and bear walking down main street to get out of the woods.

_________________
Brick wrote:
Biden is doing a GOOD job.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2023 6:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89030
Location: To the left of my post
Masks are back!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2023 7:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37159
Location: ...
they'll put them out with ruffles all dressed and ketchup spray.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2023 7:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 15977
pizza_Place: Salerno's
https://youtu.be/fXeWT8CQ6uc?t=12


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2023 11:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14351
pizza_Place: Grazianos
pittmike wrote:
Out your fucking fires out up there already. Jesus, don't they have a Smokey The Bear program? There have to be moose and bear walking down main street to get out of the woods.



I heard on the news yesterday that 2-3 years ago, Trudeau was told that the forest in its country needed to be thinned out and brush and undergrowth removed as part of forest management. This opinion was made by experts familiar with wild fire prevention and forest management. The moron refused and the rest is history. The same ignorance has occurred in my state, california for decades.

Its remarkable and ironic that the opponents to this common sense action are the same people now who are moaning and groaning are the liberal environmental stupes and who are blaming these fires and air pollution on the catch all "climate change". :twisted:

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2023 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:08 am
Posts: 6597
Location: Section 433
pizza_Place: 1. Homemade 2. Jewels
Signs like this all over Waushara county remind me not to recklessly burn.

Image

_________________
"I honestly don't see a good bet on the board here."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2023 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:08 am
Posts: 6597
Location: Section 433
pizza_Place: 1. Homemade 2. Jewels

_________________
"I honestly don't see a good bet on the board here."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2023 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 26559
too many people exist. forest fires are natural and canada sucks just as much as california so who cares if they burn.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2023 12:51 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77140
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
a genius wrote:


:lol: :lol:

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2023 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 20496
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Nas wrote:
a genius wrote:


:lol: :lol:

:lol:

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2023 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 64570
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Are we winning or losing the smoke wars?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2023 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 32289
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Darkside wrote:
Are we winning or losing the smoke wars?


As long as we have Caller Knob and Hawaii blow You, we are winning the smoking pole wars.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2023 6:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 28601
pizza_Place: What??
Fuckers are trying to burn down the White House....AGAIN!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2023 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:52 pm
Posts: 12706
Location: My Pants
pizza_Place: Geo's Pizza
Well the Chicago skyline just disappeared in the smoke and haze. Stupid Canadians.

_________________
The Original Spanky wrote:
I don't like white rappers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2023 12:41 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 27795
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
The Hawk wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Out your fucking fires out up there already. Jesus, don't they have a Smokey The Bear program? There have to be moose and bear walking down main street to get out of the woods.



I heard on the news yesterday that 2-3 years ago, Trudeau was told that the forest in its country needed to be thinned out and brush and undergrowth removed as part of forest management. This opinion was made by experts familiar with wild fire prevention and forest management. The moron refused and the rest is history. The same ignorance has occurred in my state, california for decades.

Its remarkable and ironic that the opponents to this common sense action are the same people now who are moaning and groaning are the liberal environmental stupes and who are blaming these fires and air pollution on the catch all "climate change". :twisted:


There is a subculture within the environmental movement that advocates returning managed woodlands to unmanaged wildlands. Their motivation is to maximize forest carbon storage capacity by ending the use of management strategies that yield structural complexity (ie creating varied openings, different kinds of canopies, multiple growth stages, etc). Aside from increasing the likelihood of wildfires, this concept is idiotic on multiple levels:

1) Forests across the U.S. are under siege from introduced and range-shifting invasive species, the latter of which are expanding their growth areas due to climate change. Management is essential to promote forest resilience.

2) Forests serve as habitat for many different forms of wildlife. Invasive species, climate change, development and fragmentation are collectively undermining the ability of forests to maintain this ecological function. Loss of biodiversity is environmentally damaging in a wide range of areas.

3) Fires obviously negate carbon storage, so the increasingly popular "return to the wild" approach is inherently contradictory.

We need to manage forests to promote resiliency in the face of climate change and invasive species. Resilent forests are structurally complex, highly diverse at the species level, and are future-adapted to projected climate changes. None of this can happen on its own.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:52 pm
Posts: 12706
Location: My Pants
pizza_Place: Geo's Pizza
Tall Midget wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Out your fucking fires out up there already. Jesus, don't they have a Smokey The Bear program? There have to be moose and bear walking down main street to get out of the woods.



I heard on the news yesterday that 2-3 years ago, Trudeau was told that the forest in its country needed to be thinned out and brush and undergrowth removed as part of forest management. This opinion was made by experts familiar with wild fire prevention and forest management. The moron refused and the rest is history. The same ignorance has occurred in my state, california for decades.

Its remarkable and ironic that the opponents to this common sense action are the same people now who are moaning and groaning are the liberal environmental stupes and who are blaming these fires and air pollution on the catch all "climate change". :twisted:


There is a subculture within the environmental movement that advocates returning managed woodlands to unmanaged wildlands. Their motivation is to maximize forest carbon storage capacity by ending the use of management strategies that yield structural complexity (ie creating varied openings, different kinds of canopies, multiple growth stages, etc). Aside from increasing the likelihood of wildfires, this concept is idiotic on multiple levels:

1) Forests across the U.S. are under siege from introduced and range-shifting invasive species, the latter of which are expanding their growth areas due to climate change. Management is essential to promote forest resilience.

2) Forests serve as habitat for many different forms of wildlife. Invasive species, climate change, development and fragmentation are collectively undermining the ability of forests to maintain this ecological function. Loss of biodiversity is environmentally damaging in a wide range of areas.

3) Fires obviously negate carbon storage, so the increasingly popular "return to the wild" approach is inherently contradictory.

We need to manage forests to promote resiliency in the face of climate change and invasive species. Resilent forests are structurally complex, highly diverse at the species level, and are future-adapted to projected climate changes. None of this can happen on its own.


Wasn't there also some movement to profit-ize carbon storage? In other words, there could be some annual incentive to convert to unmanaged land in order to combat deforestation. I never understood where the money would come from or how they could reach a high enough incentive to outweigh the alternative.

_________________
The Original Spanky wrote:
I don't like white rappers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2023 6:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48768
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Did you run out of water up there, you hosers? Getting kind of tired of this, eh.

_________________
https://twitter.com/DrKenCast


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2023 6:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:35 pm
Posts: 17927
Location: On the 1st tee box
pizza_Place: Kaisers
Pretty smoky here up north just over the IL border, and with the heavy wet clouds above is seems to have trapped it below for us.

_________________
Flew too close to the sun on wings of pastrami


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2023 7:33 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77042
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Tall Midget wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Out your fucking fires out up there already. Jesus, don't they have a Smokey The Bear program? There have to be moose and bear walking down main street to get out of the woods.



I heard on the news yesterday that 2-3 years ago, Trudeau was told that the forest in its country needed to be thinned out and brush and undergrowth removed as part of forest management. This opinion was made by experts familiar with wild fire prevention and forest management. The moron refused and the rest is history. The same ignorance has occurred in my state, california for decades.

Its remarkable and ironic that the opponents to this common sense action are the same people now who are moaning and groaning are the liberal environmental stupes and who are blaming these fires and air pollution on the catch all "climate change". :twisted:


There is a subculture within the environmental movement that advocates returning managed woodlands to unmanaged wildlands. Their motivation is to maximize forest carbon storage capacity by ending the use of management strategies that yield structural complexity (ie creating varied openings, different kinds of canopies, multiple growth stages, etc). Aside from increasing the likelihood of wildfires, this concept is idiotic on multiple levels:

1) Forests across the U.S. are under siege from introduced and range-shifting invasive species, the latter of which are expanding their growth areas due to climate change. Management is essential to promote forest resilience.

2) Forests serve as habitat for many different forms of wildlife. Invasive species, climate change, development and fragmentation are collectively undermining the ability of forests to maintain this ecological function. Loss of biodiversity is environmentally damaging in a wide range of areas.

3) Fires obviously negate carbon storage, so the increasingly popular "return to the wild" approach is inherently contradictory.

We need to manage forests to promote resiliency in the face of climate change and invasive species. Resilent forests are structurally complex, highly diverse at the species level, and are future-adapted to projected climate changes. None of this can happen on its own.


Isn't the concept of an "invasive species" anthropocentric? At some point all species were "invasive." What we consider an "invasive species" is only based upon a paradigm that man prefers.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2023 9:22 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 27795
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Out your fucking fires out up there already. Jesus, don't they have a Smokey The Bear program? There have to be moose and bear walking down main street to get out of the woods.



I heard on the news yesterday that 2-3 years ago, Trudeau was told that the forest in its country needed to be thinned out and brush and undergrowth removed as part of forest management. This opinion was made by experts familiar with wild fire prevention and forest management. The moron refused and the rest is history. The same ignorance has occurred in my state, california for decades.

Its remarkable and ironic that the opponents to this common sense action are the same people now who are moaning and groaning are the liberal environmental stupes and who are blaming these fires and air pollution on the catch all "climate change". :twisted:


There is a subculture within the environmental movement that advocates returning managed woodlands to unmanaged wildlands. Their motivation is to maximize forest carbon storage capacity by ending the use of management strategies that yield structural complexity (ie creating varied openings, different kinds of canopies, multiple growth stages, etc). Aside from increasing the likelihood of wildfires, this concept is idiotic on multiple levels:

1) Forests across the U.S. are under siege from introduced and range-shifting invasive species, the latter of which are expanding their growth areas due to climate change. Management is essential to promote forest resilience.

2) Forests serve as habitat for many different forms of wildlife. Invasive species, climate change, development and fragmentation are collectively undermining the ability of forests to maintain this ecological function. Loss of biodiversity is environmentally damaging in a wide range of areas.

3) Fires obviously negate carbon storage, so the increasingly popular "return to the wild" approach is inherently contradictory.

We need to manage forests to promote resiliency in the face of climate change and invasive species. Resilent forests are structurally complex, highly diverse at the species level, and are future-adapted to projected climate changes. None of this can happen on its own.


Isn't the concept of an "invasive species" anthropocentric? At some point all species were "invasive." What we consider an "invasive species" is only based upon a paradigm that man prefers.


The concept of an invasive species is both ecosystem-centric and anthropocentric.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2023 11:41 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77042
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Tall Midget wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Out your fucking fires out up there already. Jesus, don't they have a Smokey The Bear program? There have to be moose and bear walking down main street to get out of the woods.



I heard on the news yesterday that 2-3 years ago, Trudeau was told that the forest in its country needed to be thinned out and brush and undergrowth removed as part of forest management. This opinion was made by experts familiar with wild fire prevention and forest management. The moron refused and the rest is history. The same ignorance has occurred in my state, california for decades.

Its remarkable and ironic that the opponents to this common sense action are the same people now who are moaning and groaning are the liberal environmental stupes and who are blaming these fires and air pollution on the catch all "climate change". :twisted:


There is a subculture within the environmental movement that advocates returning managed woodlands to unmanaged wildlands. Their motivation is to maximize forest carbon storage capacity by ending the use of management strategies that yield structural complexity (ie creating varied openings, different kinds of canopies, multiple growth stages, etc). Aside from increasing the likelihood of wildfires, this concept is idiotic on multiple levels:

1) Forests across the U.S. are under siege from introduced and range-shifting invasive species, the latter of which are expanding their growth areas due to climate change. Management is essential to promote forest resilience.

2) Forests serve as habitat for many different forms of wildlife. Invasive species, climate change, development and fragmentation are collectively undermining the ability of forests to maintain this ecological function. Loss of biodiversity is environmentally damaging in a wide range of areas.

3) Fires obviously negate carbon storage, so the increasingly popular "return to the wild" approach is inherently contradictory.

We need to manage forests to promote resiliency in the face of climate change and invasive species. Resilent forests are structurally complex, highly diverse at the species level, and are future-adapted to projected climate changes. None of this can happen on its own.


Isn't the concept of an "invasive species" anthropocentric? At some point all species were "invasive." What we consider an "invasive species" is only based upon a paradigm that man prefers.


The concept of an invasive species is both ecosystem-centric and anthropocentric.


If that's all you have to say, I'll take it as a victory. :lol:

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2023 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4669
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
This is unreal, like wrath of God stuff.

Can't even go outside today. The CSO picked a bad day for having their season ending concert in the park.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2023 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 20496
pizza_Place: Pizanos
It’s pretty gross out there.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2023 12:57 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 27795
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Out your fucking fires out up there already. Jesus, don't they have a Smokey The Bear program? There have to be moose and bear walking down main street to get out of the woods.



I heard on the news yesterday that 2-3 years ago, Trudeau was told that the forest in its country needed to be thinned out and brush and undergrowth removed as part of forest management. This opinion was made by experts familiar with wild fire prevention and forest management. The moron refused and the rest is history. The same ignorance has occurred in my state, california for decades.

Its remarkable and ironic that the opponents to this common sense action are the same people now who are moaning and groaning are the liberal environmental stupes and who are blaming these fires and air pollution on the catch all "climate change". :twisted:


There is a subculture within the environmental movement that advocates returning managed woodlands to unmanaged wildlands. Their motivation is to maximize forest carbon storage capacity by ending the use of management strategies that yield structural complexity (ie creating varied openings, different kinds of canopies, multiple growth stages, etc). Aside from increasing the likelihood of wildfires, this concept is idiotic on multiple levels:

1) Forests across the U.S. are under siege from introduced and range-shifting invasive species, the latter of which are expanding their growth areas due to climate change. Management is essential to promote forest resilience.

2) Forests serve as habitat for many different forms of wildlife. Invasive species, climate change, development and fragmentation are collectively undermining the ability of forests to maintain this ecological function. Loss of biodiversity is environmentally damaging in a wide range of areas.

3) Fires obviously negate carbon storage, so the increasingly popular "return to the wild" approach is inherently contradictory.

We need to manage forests to promote resiliency in the face of climate change and invasive species. Resilent forests are structurally complex, highly diverse at the species level, and are future-adapted to projected climate changes. None of this can happen on its own.


Isn't the concept of an "invasive species" anthropocentric? At some point all species were "invasive." What we consider an "invasive species" is only based upon a paradigm that man prefers.


The concept of an invasive species is both ecosystem-centric and anthropocentric.


If that's all you have to say, I'll take it as a victory. :lol:


I'm not sure what you mean. Surely you above all others here appreciate the need to manage ecosystems so that we continue to reap the benefits from them that allow MANY to maintain their standard of living. Sustaining ecosystem function is central to this where forests are concerned.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2023 12:58 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77140
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
It’s pretty gross out there.


You're in Indiana or Wisconsin?

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2023 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 28489
Nas wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
It’s pretty gross out there.


You're in Indiana or Wisconsin?

:evil:

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2023 1:18 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77140
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
It’s pretty gross out there.


You're in Indiana or Wisconsin?

:evil:


I'm only a moth.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2023 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 28489
Nas wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
It’s pretty gross out there.


You're in Indiana or Wisconsin?

:evil:


I'm only a moth.

You don't have to be jealous, just move up here.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2023 2:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14351
pizza_Place: Grazianos
pittmike wrote:
Out your fucking fires out up there already. Jesus, don't they have a Smokey The Bear program? There have to be moose and bear walking down main street to get out of the woods.



Mussolini wannabi Justin Trudeau is likely blaming truck drivers for causing the out of control fires that were actually caused by piss poor forestation policies that threaten his population and that of its neighbor the United States.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2023 2:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14351
pizza_Place: Grazianos
W_Z wrote:
they'll put them out with ruffles all dressed and ketchup spray.



Maybe instead of ketchup, they'll coat Maple Syrup on the front of them?

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 159 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group