Chicago Fanatics Message Board
http://chicagofanatics.com/

Royal Rumble
http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=88&t=98404
Page 2 of 3

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Don Tiny wrote:
How many "unknown" slots were there going into this match?


Quite a bit I think.

5-10.

Author:  FrankDrebin [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Don Tiny wrote:
Can anyone work anymore without TALKING IN AN OBVIOUS FASHION?


It's a lost art, plus the camera angles show a lot more than before

Author:  Don Tiny [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

FrankDrebin wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Can anyone work anymore without TALKING IN AN OBVIOUS FASHION?


It's a lost art, plus the camera angles show a lot more than before


As over-produced as the product is, it's astonishing that that statement is accurate.

I feel like Cornette ... THEY'RE EXPOSING THE BUSINESS!

Author:  FrankDrebin [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Don't be sour, feel the unicorn power

Author:  Don Tiny [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

FrankDrebin wrote:
Don't be sour, feel the unicorn power


I'm sour there's no trombone.

You want buyrates and asses every 18"? Trombones and midgets, even midgets with midget trombones.

Author:  Don Tiny [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Outstanding. :lol:

Author:  FrankDrebin [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Don Tiny wrote:
FrankDrebin wrote:
Don't be sour, feel the unicorn power


I'm sour there's no trombone.

You want buyrates and asses every 18"? Trombones and midgets, even midgets with midget trombones.


They debuted Francesca 2 earlier tonight...

Author:  FrankDrebin [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: @ R Truth

Author:  Don Tiny [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Well that pretty much explains how Roman will go over without working the whole match.

Author:  FrankDrebin [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Don Tiny wrote:
Well that pretty much explains how Roman will go over without working the whole match.


Austin in Royal Rumble '99

Author:  Don Tiny [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Well there's AJ's first program - neat!

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Indeed.

Didn't mind that elimination at all.

Author:  RFDC [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

I stepped out of the room, who eliminated AJ?

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Owens.

Now Sami Zayne eliminates Owens.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

chas is rolling over in his grave.

Author:  Don Tiny [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Seriously?

WM is Reigns chasing HHH for the belt?

2016 starts with answering the age-old question, "Am I fucking going over?"

Ye gods. Fuck this noise.

Thank goodness I've been watching X-Files too.

Christ, let's party like it's 1999.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Absolutely the right move.

Author:  Don Tiny [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Terry's Peeps wrote:
Absolutely the right move.


You're high.

Author:  Douchebag [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Terry's Peeps wrote:
chas is rolling over in his grave.

:lol: :lol:

Author:  RFDC [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Terry's Peeps wrote:
chas is rolling over in his grave.

:lol:

Awesome!

Love HHH

Author:  sjboyd0137 [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Sigh...

The right move, but fuck Triple H

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Don Tiny wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Absolutely the right move.


You're high.


It was.

You have your top babyface chasing the evil champion to Mania.

Author:  Douchebag [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Terry's Peeps wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Absolutely the right move.


You're high.


It was.

You have your top babyface chasing the evil champion to Mania.

Right when his music hit at #30, I knew the outcome.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

This was the plan for at least a month.

I'm glad they stuck with it rather than try and swerve the fans just because.

Author:  Douchebag [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Terry's Peeps wrote:
This was the plan for at least a month.

I'm glad they stuck with it rather than try and swerve the fans just because.

There's not another single heel on the roster they can throw the belt on?

Author:  RFDC [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Douchebag wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
This was the plan for at least a month.

I'm glad they stuck with it rather than try and swerve the fans just because.

There's not another single heel on the roster they can throw the belt on?

None that can get the heat that HHH can get.

Author:  Don Tiny [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Nothing more compelling than having your top babyface booed out of 9 out of 10 buildings.

So somehow it's best for business to bury the roster, overexpose HHH, overexpose the authority, and have an undercard of matches that everyone has seen before excepting maybe one or two here and there (eg, Owens v Styles).

Kiss my black ass; I've watched this shit since before some of you were born and long enough to remember each and every Von Erich being alive and this corporatized pablum 50/50 booking cyclical repetitive nonsense is hot fucking garbage and ONLY "works" because there is no competition.

Author:  RFDC [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Don Tiny wrote:
Nothing more compelling than having your top babyface booed out of 9 out of 10 buildings.

So somehow it's best for business to bury the roster, overexpose HHH, overexpose the authority, and have an undercard of matches that everyone has seen before excepting maybe one or two here and there (eg, Owens v Styles).

Kiss my black ass; I've watched this shit since before some of you were born and long enough to remember each and every Von Erich being alive and this corporatized pablum 50/50 booking cyclical repetitive nonsense is hot fucking garbage and ONLY "works" because there is no competition.


DT is the booker. Tell us what you would do with what they have right now...

Author:  ZephMarshack [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

Terry's Peeps wrote:
This was the plan for at least a month.

I'm glad they stuck with it rather than try and swerve the fans just because.

Were you also glad when they stuck with the plan everyone predicted the preceding 2 Rumbles?

Author:  Douchebag [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Royal Rumble

RFDC wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Nothing more compelling than having your top babyface booed out of 9 out of 10 buildings.

So somehow it's best for business to bury the roster, overexpose HHH, overexpose the authority, and have an undercard of matches that everyone has seen before excepting maybe one or two here and there (eg, Owens v Styles).

Kiss my black ass; I've watched this shit since before some of you were born and long enough to remember each and every Von Erich being alive and this corporatized pablum 50/50 booking cyclical repetitive nonsense is hot fucking garbage and ONLY "works" because there is no competition.


DT is the booker. Tell us what you would do with what they have right now...

Bring back Hogan in a KKK Hood and have him crucify Stephanie McMahon on a burning cross.

Page 2 of 3 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/