Chicago Fanatics Message Board http://chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Fat Boy Eddie Lacey http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=80803 |
Page 8 of 12 |
Author: | good dolphin [ Mon Sep 22, 2014 1:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Hawg Ass wrote: I have already stated myself to GD today, nobody should have to do that twice. I wasn't specifically referencing you. Page 3 is a discussion about backs from the 2013 draft class. That is starting to look like a pretty good class when it was originally thought to be bad. Ball, Ellington, Bell, etc. have had some good moments in a short time |
Author: | RFDC [ Mon Sep 22, 2014 1:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Scorehead wrote: Nice game vs Detroit tubby! You were responsible for giving up 9 points. Keep it up! what did Hawg do>? |
Author: | Hawg Ass [ Mon Sep 22, 2014 1:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
RFDC wrote: Scorehead wrote: Nice game vs Detroit tubby! You were responsible for giving up 9 points. Keep it up! what did Hawg do>? ![]() |
Author: | Furious Styles [ Mon Sep 22, 2014 1:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
RFDC wrote: Scorehead wrote: Nice game vs Detroit tubby! You were responsible for giving up 9 points. Keep it up! what did Hawg do>? Teased us with his presence at a golf outing, only to place a priority on a bunch of bratty 8th graders. |
Author: | Hawg Ass [ Mon Sep 22, 2014 1:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Furious Styles wrote: RFDC wrote: Scorehead wrote: Nice game vs Detroit tubby! You were responsible for giving up 9 points. Keep it up! what did Hawg do>? Teased us with his presence at a golf outing, only to place a priority on a bunch of bratty 8th graders. I am going thru enough today, don't be piling on mister!!! |
Author: | good dolphin [ Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Both the Packers and Bears are going to look at this game as an opportunity to get their running games going. I think both will accomplish it. If I were a betting man, I'd be looking heavily at the under for Sunday. |
Author: | Hawg Ass [ Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
good dolphin wrote: Both the Packers and Bears are going to look at this game as an opportunity to get their running games going. I think both will accomplish it. If I were a betting man, I'd be looking heavily at the under for Sunday. I have to think with all of the injuries in the Bear secondary that is where the Packers will look. |
Author: | good dolphin [ Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Neither team really WANTS to run the ball. I think both coaches understand that they need to get some positive momentum in that end of their games |
Author: | Hawg Ass [ Tue Sep 23, 2014 10:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
good dolphin wrote: Neither team really WANTS to run the ball. I think both coaches understand that they need to get some positive momentum in that end of their games We are in agreement then, am I supposed to hate you this week by the way? I mean more than usual. |
Author: | good dolphin [ Mon Sep 29, 2014 9:03 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
It's uh-oh time |
Author: | Hawg Ass [ Mon Sep 29, 2014 9:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
good dolphin wrote: It's uh-oh time I agree, the offensive line is pathetic at run blocking. I see no holes being opened up at all, and then is 4 games in, it is a problem. |
Author: | Hawg Ass [ Thu Oct 02, 2014 9:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Good job Fatty!!!!!!!!!!! |
Author: | Nas [ Thu Oct 02, 2014 9:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Starks still looks better but that competition lit a fire up under his ass. |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Thu Oct 02, 2014 9:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Nas wrote: Starks still looks better but that competition lit a fire up under his ass. The guy who loves RBs who get tackled by a feather would say that. |
Author: | Nas [ Thu Oct 02, 2014 9:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Kirkwood wrote: Nas wrote: Starks still looks better but that competition lit a fire up under his ass. The guy who loves RBs who get tackled by a feather would say that. Are you talking about the RB that will very likely end his career with over 15k yards from scrimmage? |
Author: | FavreFan [ Thu Oct 02, 2014 10:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Saying Starks looks better tonight is just being plain dishonest. |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Thu Oct 02, 2014 10:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
FavreFan wrote: Saying Starks looks better tonight is just being plain dishonest. Lacy 13-105 2TD 8.1YPC Starks 8-36 4.5 Yeah, uh, Starks looks much better ![]() |
Author: | Nas [ Thu Oct 02, 2014 10:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
FavreFan wrote: Saying Starks looks better tonight is just being plain dishonest. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Fri Oct 03, 2014 8:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
![]() Don't know who that joker was but he got pancaked. Although Fatty crushed Rhode's shoulder on his 1st run I wonder if Bears fans would've like a CB tandem of Fuller and Rhodes. Oh Emery. |
Author: | Brick [ Fri Oct 03, 2014 8:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Kirkwood wrote: Don't know who that joker was but he got pancaked. Should have been a penalty.
|
Author: | Kirkwood [ Fri Oct 03, 2014 8:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Kirkwood wrote: Don't know who that joker was but he got pancaked. Should have been a penalty.![]() Whatever happened to that rule? |
Author: | good dolphin [ Fri Oct 03, 2014 8:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
the fatty fans always come out in force each time his YPC bobs up to 4 |
Author: | Brick [ Fri Oct 03, 2014 8:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Kirkwood wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: Kirkwood wrote: Don't know who that joker was but he got pancaked. Should have been a penalty.![]() Whatever happened to that rule? |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Fri Oct 03, 2014 8:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Kirkwood wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: Kirkwood wrote: Don't know who that joker was but he got pancaked. Should have been a penalty.![]() Whatever happened to that rule? Player safety! |
Author: | good dolphin [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
can we just close this thread already? |
Author: | Furious Styles [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
bump |
Author: | Hawg Ass [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:41 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
GD, is full of piss and vinegar this morning, amazing how quiet he was when the Bears lost. |
Author: | Scorehead [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
good dolphin wrote: the fatty fans always come out in force each time his YPC bobs up to 4 A whopping 2.9 YPC yesterday. |
Author: | Hawg Ass [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Scorehead wrote: good dolphin wrote: the fatty fans always come out in force each time his YPC bobs up to 4 A whopping 2.9 YPC yesterday. Yep, the offensive line was for shit yesterday, run blocking and pass blocking. Rodgers was a human pinata. |
Author: | good dolphin [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
he's had one good game all year |
Page 8 of 12 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |