good dolphin wrote:
did you notice though, another announcer was treating him like he is an elite RB on a bad run
Yes. I heard the announcer say he's quickly turning into one of the premier backs in the league
I can name 12 better, at minimum.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board http://chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Fat Boy Eddie Lacey http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=80803 |
Page 9 of 12 |
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
good dolphin wrote: he's had one good game all year Yep, and the offense as a whole has had 1 good rushing game this year. |
|
| Author: | Kirkwood [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Hawg Ass wrote: good dolphin wrote: he's had one good game all year Yep, and the offense as a whole has had 1 good rushing game this year. Corey Linsley had a horrible game. My guy Bahk needs to hit the squat rack. Quick but too weak to drive d-linemen!!! |
|
| Author: | redskingreg [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 11:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
This guy stinks! |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 11:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
did you notice though, another announcer was treating him like he is an elite RB on a bad run |
|
| Author: | redskingreg [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 11:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
good dolphin wrote: did you notice though, another announcer was treating him like he is an elite RB on a bad run Yes. I heard the announcer say he's quickly turning into one of the premier backs in the league I can name 12 better, at minimum.
|
|
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 11:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
A healthy Starks is better. |
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 11:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Nas wrote: A healthy Starks is better. He wasn't yesterday and he is very healthy. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 11:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Hawg Ass wrote: Nas wrote: A healthy Starks is better. He wasn't yesterday and he is very healthy. He has to knock that rust off |
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 11:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Nas wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: Nas wrote: A healthy Starks is better. He wasn't yesterday and he is very healthy. He has to knock that rust off 
|
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 11:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Hawg Ass wrote: Yep, the offensive line was for shit yesterday, run blocking and pass blocking. Rodgers was a human pinata. Hawg Ass wrote: Yep, and the offense as a whole has had 1 good rushing game this year. But "the Packers are the class of the NFC right now." |
|
| Author: | Scorehead [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 11:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
redskingreg wrote: good dolphin wrote: did you notice though, another announcer was treating him like he is an elite RB on a bad run Yes. I heard the announcer say he's quickly turning into one of the premier backs in the league I can name 12 better, at minimum.Only 12? Gotta be 20 better. I remember laughing at guys who were picking Lacy in the first round of fantasy drafts as many services such as Yahoo had him ranked as THE 5TH BEST FANTASY FOOTBALL PLAYER IN THE LEAGUE! Oops. |
|
| Author: | redskingreg [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 11:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Scorehead wrote: redskingreg wrote: good dolphin wrote: did you notice though, another announcer was treating him like he is an elite RB on a bad run Yes. I heard the announcer say he's quickly turning into one of the premier backs in the league I can name 12 better, at minimum.Only 12? Gotta be 20 better. I remember laughing at guys who were picking Lacy in the first round of fantasy drafts as many services such as Yahoo had him ranked as THE 5TH BEST FANTASY FOOTBALL PLAYER IN THE LEAGUE! Oops. Yeah, I was going to edit that post. 12 was a bit low. And I was late to a draft (not my fault) and was stuck with Lacy as an auto-draft first rounder. |
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 11:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
redskingreg wrote: Scorehead wrote: redskingreg wrote: good dolphin wrote: did you notice though, another announcer was treating him like he is an elite RB on a bad run Yes. I heard the announcer say he's quickly turning into one of the premier backs in the league I can name 12 better, at minimum.Only 12? Gotta be 20 better. I remember laughing at guys who were picking Lacy in the first round of fantasy drafts as many services such as Yahoo had him ranked as THE 5TH BEST FANTASY FOOTBALL PLAYER IN THE LEAGUE! Oops. Yeah, I was going to edit that post. 12 was a bit low. And I was late to a draft (not my fault) and was stuck with Lacy as an auto-draft first rounder. Having Scorehead on your side is never a good thing Greg. 
|
|
| Author: | redskingreg [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 11:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Not many on my side here. I'll take whoever I can get. Unless it's Ike. Fuck that walking shit stain. |
|
| Author: | Scorehead [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 12:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
We are on the right side Greg. |
|
| Author: | redskingreg [ Mon Oct 13, 2014 12:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Scorehead wrote: We are on the right side Greg. Except for my racist moniker |
|
| Author: | Kirkwood [ Sun Nov 16, 2014 7:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Lacy...beast. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Sun Nov 16, 2014 7:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Kirkwood wrote: Lacy...beast. He's looking great. |
|
| Author: | Kirkwood [ Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
25 att 125 yards 1TD 2 rec 13 yards 1TD The way he single handedly closed the game was nails. Pretty good. |
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Kirkwood wrote: 25 att 125 yards 1TD 2 rec 13 yards 1TD The way he single handedly closed the game was nails. Pretty good. I thought they looked like shit yesterday, if they play that way Sunday they will get their ass handed to them. |
|
| Author: | Kirkwood [ Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Hawg Ass wrote: Kirkwood wrote: 25 att 125 yards 1TD 2 rec 13 yards 1TD The way he single handedly closed the game was nails. Pretty good. I thought they looked like shit yesterday, if they play that way Sunday they will get their ass handed to them. Zimmer owns Rodgers. I expected a tough game. Away game against biggest rival pulling out all the stops. That had trap written all over it. |
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Kirkwood wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: Kirkwood wrote: 25 att 125 yards 1TD 2 rec 13 yards 1TD The way he single handedly closed the game was nails. Pretty good. I thought they looked like shit yesterday, if they play that way Sunday they will get their ass handed to them. Zimmer owns Rodgers. I expected a tough game. Away game against biggest rival pulling out all the stops. That had trap written all over it. No rhythm at all to the offense, very undisciplined team yesterday with 8 penalties, piss poor tackling and a defensive coordinator that on one of the biggest offensive series of the game only rushes 4 guys time after time. |
|
| Author: | Kirkwood [ Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Hawg Ass wrote: Kirkwood wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: Kirkwood wrote: 25 att 125 yards 1TD 2 rec 13 yards 1TD The way he single handedly closed the game was nails. Pretty good. I thought they looked like shit yesterday, if they play that way Sunday they will get their ass handed to them. Zimmer owns Rodgers. I expected a tough game. Away game against biggest rival pulling out all the stops. That had trap written all over it. No rhythm at all to the offense, very undisciplined team yesterday with 8 penalties, piss poor tackling and a defensive coordinator that on one of the biggest offensive series of the game only rushes 4 guys time after time. I was fine with the lack of rushers. I blame Shields, Tramon and Hawk for getting burned a lot. I thought it was a good reality check game. Though, they will lose next Sunday. |
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Mon Nov 24, 2014 10:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
So you are fine with letting a rookie quarterback just sit back there with no pressure, I am not. |
|
| Author: | Kirkwood [ Mon Nov 24, 2014 10:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Hawg Ass wrote: So you are fine with letting a rookie quarterback just sit back there with no pressure, I am not. Yes, I am more disappointed that 4 didn't get home. Vikings o-line isn't great. I hated how Hawk lacked any anticipation and let Rudolph leak past him a few times. kesha's guy Charles Johnson had a game. Too bad the Browns stole him and we're stuck with Dorsey. 
|
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Played a very good game yesterday, after re-watching it, I wish they may have given him a few more carries. |
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Fri Dec 19, 2014 11:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
He is 11th in yards from scrimmage in the NFL right now, having a damn good year. |
|
| Author: | Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Fri Dec 19, 2014 6:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Hawg Ass wrote: He is 11th in yards from scrimmage in the NFL right now, having a damn good year. He'll never be elite like Forte. |
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Sun Dec 21, 2014 1:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: He is 11th in yards from scrimmage in the NFL right now, having a damn good year. He'll never be elite like Forte. Yep, he might be able to run thru a tackle. |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Sun Dec 21, 2014 6:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fat Boy Eddie Lacey |
He was faster than Forte for sure from the run I saw. |
|
| Page 9 of 12 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|