Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic

Looks like just the pick. Solid deal for the 49er. Pats must not think he's good enough to lead them to a title post-Brady or if Brady goes down this year.

FavreFan wrote:

Looks like just the pick. Solid deal for the 49er. Pats must not think he's good enough to lead them to a title post-Brady or if Brady goes down this year.

Brady said he's playing until 45. Jimmy is a FA after the season. Pats did well.

Makes the Bears BS for Mitchell look worse, though.

Pats won. That's always true. I can't think of a terrible deal they've made.

Who will be the backup for Brady now? They better hope he stays healthy

Pats won. That's always true. I can't think of a terrible deal they've made.

RFDC wrote:

Who will be the backup for Brady now? They better hope he stays healthy

Kaep

Big Chicagoan wrote:

RFDC wrote:

Who will be the backup for Brady now? They better hope he stays healthy

Kaep

You may be right. Who available is better?

Jbi11s wrote:

Big Chicagoan wrote:

RFDC wrote:

Who will be the backup for Brady now? They better hope he stays healthy

Kaep

You may be right. Who available is better?

Brian hoyer

Belichik really likes early 2nd round picks.

Even if the Broncos matched or slightly beat the Niners offer, don't think the Pats would want Jimmy G in the AFC. Better to bury him in a rebuilding NFC franchise.

Kirk Cousins needs to find a new next team now.

Nas wrote:

Pats won. That's always true. I can't think of a terrible deal they've made.

Actually lost on this one. He was a 2nd round pick. Had him for 4 years, got nothing out of him on the field, and now got another pick for him. So, basically, they deferred their 2nd round pick for 4 years. Could have used it on someone who could actually help them on the field.

Nas wrote:

Pats won. That's always true. I can't think of a terrible deal they've made.

Niners giving up a 2nd for an 7 week rental, somebody is going to give JG a fat contract after that.

Big Chicagoan wrote:

Nas wrote:

Pats won. That's always true. I can't think of a terrible deal they've made.

They essentially got a late first round pick for a guy they're not going to keep.

Nas wrote:

Big Chicagoan wrote:

Nas wrote:

Pats won. That's always true. I can't think of a terrible deal they've made.

They essentially got a late first round pick for a guy they're not going to keep.

My point still stands. Had they drafted a good WR or a good DL instead, they may have won multiple SBs. Instead they drafted him, never used him, and got the same pick back 4 years later. Meanwhile, Brady is 4 years older.

312player wrote:

Niners giving up a 2nd for an 7 week rental, somebody is going to give JG a fat contract after that.

I'd be very surprised if they don't resign him. Truly terrible trade if that's the case.

Author:	FavreFan [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 7:34 pm ]
Post subject:	Garoppolo to 49ers
For a 2018 second rounder. Maybe more, not sure

Author:	FavreFan [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 7:37 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Looks like just the pick. Solid deal for the 49er. Pats must not think he's good enough to lead them to a title post-Brady or if Brady goes down this year.

Author:	Big Chicagoan [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 7:41 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
FavreFan wrote: Looks like just the pick. Solid deal for the 49er. Pats must not think he's good enough to lead them to a title post-Brady or if Brady goes down this year. Brady said he's playing until 45. Jimmy is a FA after the season. Pats did well. Makes the Bears BS for Mitchell look worse, though.

Author:	'77Cubs [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 7:42 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Pats were offered more last off-season. Stupid.

Author:	FavreFan [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 7:43 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Big Chicagoan wrote: FavreFan wrote: Looks like just the pick. Solid deal for the 49er. Pats must not think he's good enough to lead them to a title post-Brady or if Brady goes down this year. Brady said he's playing until 45. Jimmy is a FA after the season. Pats did well. Makes the Bears BS for Mitchell look worse, though. Brady also thinks drinking water prevents sunburn. He's not playing til he's 45.

Chicago Fanatics Message Board http://chicagofanatics.com/

Garoppolo to 49ers http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=109280	Page 1 of 2

Author:	Jbi11s [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 7:46 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Good trade for 49ers.

Author:	Nas [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 7:53 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Pats won. That's always true. I can't think of a terrible deal they've made.

Author:	Hussra [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:12 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Belichik really likes early 2nd round picks.

Author:	Big Chicagoan [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:22 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Nas wrote: Pats won. That's always true. I can't think of a terrible deal they've made. Actually lost on this one. He was a 2nd round pick. Had him for 4 years, got nothing out of him on the field, and now got another pick for him. So, basically, they deferred their 2nd round pick for 4 years. Could have used it on someone who could actually help them on the field.

Author:	RFDC [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:23 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Who will be the backup for Brady now? They better hope he stays healthy

Author:	Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:42 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Nas wrote: Pats won. That's always true. I can't think of a terrible deal they've made. Trading picks for Albert Haynesworth and Chad Ochocinco were mistakes.

Author:	Jbi11s [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:46 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Big Chicagoan wrote: RFDC wrote: Who will be the backup for Brady now? They better hope he stays healthy Kaep You may be right. Who available is better?

Author:	billypootons [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:49 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Jbi11s wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: RFDC wrote: Who will be the backup for Brady now? They better hope he stays healthy Kaep You may be right. Who available is better? Brian hoyer

Author:	Jbi11s [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:49 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
billypootons wrote: Jbi11s wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: RFDC wrote: Who will be the backup for Brady now? They better hope he stays healthy Kaep You may be right. Who available is better? Brian hoyer Brian Hoyer is fucking garbage.

Page 1 of 2	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	Furious Styles [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:52 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Hussra wrote: Belichik really likes early 2nd round picks. The trade was for the Pats original 2nd rd. pick that SF acquired.

Author:	FavreFan [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 9:02 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
The Broncos didn't want to match/beat this offer? Morons

Author:	Hussra [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 9:12 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers

Author:	Hussra [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 9:16 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Even if the Broncos matched or slightly beat the Niners offer, don't think the Pats would want Jimmy G in the AFC. Better to bury him in a rebuilding NFC franchise. Kirk Cousins needs to find a new next team now.

Author:	FavreFan [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 9:19 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Hussra wrote: Even if the Broncos matched or slightly beat the Niners offer, don't think the Pats would want Jimmy G in the AFC. Better to bury him in a rebuilding NFC franchise. Kirk Cousins needs to find a new next team now. I thought about that but I don't think Belichick would've weighed that too heavily. A 2nd and 4th maybe or something. Either way, Broncos season is pretty much over now

Author:	Regular Reader [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 9:34 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Elway must want to kill Paxton Lynch and Chad Kelly

Author:	Minooka Meatball [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 9:38 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Big Chicagoan wrote: Nas wrote: Pats won. That's always true. I can't think of a terrible deal they've made. Actually lost on this one. He was a 2nd round pick. Had him for 4 years, got nothing out of him on the field, and now got another pick for him. So, basically, they deferred their 2nd round pick for 4 years. Could have used it on someone who could actually help them on the field. Yeah, because it’s not like they won the SB over those four years...oh, wait...

Author:	Chet Coppock's Fur Coat [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:00 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Maybe the Bears can trade Glennnon to the Pats for a conditional 5th.

Author:	312player [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:10 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Niners giving up a 2nd for an 7 week rental, somebody is going to give JG a fat contract after that.

Author:	Nas [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:17 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Big Chicagoan wrote: Nas wrote: Pats won. That's always true. I can't think of a terrible deal they've made. Actually lost on this one. He was a 2nd round pick. Had him for 4 years, got nothing out of him on the field, and now got another pick for him. So, basically, they deferred their 2nd round pick for 4 years. Could have used it on someone who could actually help them on the field. They essentially got a late first round pick for a guy they're not going to keep.

Author:	FavreFan [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:22 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
312player wrote: Niners giving up a 2nd for an 7 week rental, somebody is going to give JG a fat contract after that. I'd be very surprised if they don't resign him. Truly terrible trade if that's the case.

Author:	Big Chicagoan [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:24 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Nas wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: Nas wrote: Pats won. That's always true. I can't think of a terrible deal they've made. Actually lost on this one. He was a 2nd round pick. Had him for 4 years, got nothing out of him on the field, and now got another pick for him. So, basically, they deferred their 2nd round pick for 4 years. Could have used it on someone who could actually help them on the field. They essentially got a late first round pick for a guy they're not going to keep. My point still stands. Had they drafted a good WR or a good DL instead, they may have won multiple SBs. Instead they drafted him, never used him, and got the same pick back 4 years later. Meanwhile, Brady is 4 years older.

Author:	SpiralStairs [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:25 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Hussra wrote: Even if the Broncos matched or slightly beat the Niners offer, don't think the Pats would want Jimmy G in the AFC. Better to bury him in a rebuilding NFC franchise. Kirk Cousins needs to find a new next team now. The Jets!

Author:	312player [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:27 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
Big Chicagoan wrote: Nas wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: Nas wrote: Pats won. That's always true. I can't think of a terrible deal they've made. Actually lost on this one. He was a 2nd round pick. Had him for 4 years, got nothing out of him on the field, and now got another pick for him. So, basically, they deferred their 2nd round pick for 4 years. Could have used it on someone who could actually help them on the field. They essentially got a late first round pick for a guy they're not going to keep. My point still stands. Had they drafted a good WR or a good DL instead, they may have won multiple SBs. Instead they drafted him, never used him, and got the same pick back 4 years later. Meanwhile, Brady is 4 years older. Not having to use your backup qb is a good thing, somebody is going to give him 5 years 90 million. They were going to let him walk in 2 months.

Author:	312player [ Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:28 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Garoppolo to 49ers
FavreFan wrote: 312player wrote: Niners giving up a 2nd for an 7 week rental, somebody is going to give JG a fat contract after that. I'd be very surprised if they don't resign him. Truly terrible trade if that's the case. I could see Arizona landing him.