Chicago Fanatics Message Board
http://chicagofanatics.com/

Super Bowl
http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=110486
Page 1 of 12

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:00 am ]
Post subject:  Super Bowl


OddsShark
OddsShark
@OddsShark
Opening line for #SBLII via BetOnline (@DaveMasonBOL):

Patriots -6.5
Eagles +6.5
OU 45.5
7:19 PM · Jan 21, 2018


Eagles +6.5 and over is the way to go, imo.

Author:  Beardown [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

5.5 was the opening line in most books. Was for me. I quickly grabbed that from my guy. No way it goes down. Public will pound the Pats at 5.5.

It will be bet up to 7 by kickoff.

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

Pats have never won a SB by more than 6. I don’t think they start now.

Author:  veganfan21 [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

FavreFan wrote:
Pats have never won a SB by more than 6. I don’t think they start now.


They'll win this one by 40. The Pats are going to study the hell out of Foles and beat his ass two weeks from now. Foles' only chance is to develop his left hand during these two weeks so he can throw the Pats off.

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Pats have never won a SB by more than 6. I don’t think they start now.


They'll win this one by 40. The Pats are going to study the hell out of Foles and beat his ass two weeks from now. Foles' only chance is to develop his left hand during these two weeks so he can throw the Pats off.

:scratch:

I thought you hated the Pats? I think you’re the only poster on the board who has yet to acknowledge Brady is the GOAT

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

Eagles +40 would be a good bet. You run a book, vegan?

Author:  Beardown [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

FavreFan wrote:
Pats have never won a SB by more than 6. I don’t think they start now.


Their past Super Bowls have nothing to do with this game. They didn't play Foles in those other games.

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

Beardown wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Pats have never won a SB by more than 6. I don’t think they start now.


Their past Super Bowls have nothing to do with this game. They didn't play Foles in those other games.

They’re 0-4 all time against Mark Sanchez and Eli Manning and just barely beat Blake Bortles. Good defenses slow them down. Eagles have a good defense.

Author:  Beardown [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

FavreFan wrote:
Beardown wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Pats have never won a SB by more than 6. I don’t think they start now.


Their past Super Bowls have nothing to do with this game. They didn't play Foles in those other games.

They’re 0-4 all time against Mark Sanchez and Eli Manning and just barely beat Blake Bortles. Good defenses slow them down. Eagles have a good defense


I know. And I took the Jags +7 today and won. Jags are better then the Eagles. Neutral field in the SB. I know. But I still love the Pats -5.5 against Philly.

If Wentz was the QB for this game it would be a pick em.

Author:  veganfan21 [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 1:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Pats have never won a SB by more than 6. I don’t think they start now.


They'll win this one by 40. The Pats are going to study the hell out of Foles and beat his ass two weeks from now. Foles' only chance is to develop his left hand during these two weeks so he can throw the Pats off.

:scratch:

I thought you hated the Pats? I think you’re the only poster on the board who has yet to acknowledge Brady is the GOAT


Anyone who hates cheating should hate the Pats. That being said they'll destroy Philly. Brady ain't goat.

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 1:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Pats have never won a SB by more than 6. I don’t think they start now.


They'll win this one by 40. The Pats are going to study the hell out of Foles and beat his ass two weeks from now. Foles' only chance is to develop his left hand during these two weeks so he can throw the Pats off.

:scratch:

I thought you hated the Pats? I think you’re the only poster on the board who has yet to acknowledge Brady is the GOAT


Anyone who hates cheating should hate the Pats. That being said they'll destroy Philly. Brady ain't goat.

:lol:

Brady aint GOAT but LeBron is. Never change, vegan.

Why are they going to destroy Philly? Care for a sig or avatar wager?

Author:  veganfan21 [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 1:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Pats have never won a SB by more than 6. I don’t think they start now.


They'll win this one by 40. The Pats are going to study the hell out of Foles and beat his ass two weeks from now. Foles' only chance is to develop his left hand during these two weeks so he can throw the Pats off.

:scratch:

I thought you hated the Pats? I think you’re the only poster on the board who has yet to acknowledge Brady is the GOAT


Anyone who hates cheating should hate the Pats. That being said they'll destroy Philly. Brady ain't goat.

:lol:

Brady aint GOAT but LeBron is. Never change, vegan.

Why are they going to destroy Philly? Care for a sig or avatar wager?


LBJ isn't goat either. That was a typo. He's top three and he's also responsible for kyrie irvings entire playoff record. what's the bet?

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 1:54 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Pats have never won a SB by more than 6. I don’t think they start now.


They'll win this one by 40. The Pats are going to study the hell out of Foles and beat his ass two weeks from now. Foles' only chance is to develop his left hand during these two weeks so he can throw the Pats off.

:scratch:

I thought you hated the Pats? I think you’re the only poster on the board who has yet to acknowledge Brady is the GOAT


Anyone who hates cheating should hate the Pats. That being said they'll destroy Philly. Brady ain't goat.

:lol:

Brady aint GOAT but LeBron is. Never change, vegan.

Why are they going to destroy Philly? Care for a sig or avatar wager?


LBJ isn't goat either. That was a typo. He's top three and he's also responsible for kyrie irvings entire playoff record. what's the bet?

The Kyrie playoff record argument obviously changes this year. Should be fun to watch.

Bet is I'll take Eagles +6.5. Winner of the bet gets to choose the other's avatar from the end of the game until May 1st. Both of us agree to log on after the game either way to get the avatar changed that night.

Author:  Nas [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 7:20 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

I think you have to take anything under 7 for the Patriots.

Author:  W_Z [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 7:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

how could anyone have watched both games yesterday and come to the conclusion that the eagles will be destroyed by the patriots? they just decimated the vikings, who had a better defense than the pats.

foles isn't wentz but he's proven that he's not a bum.

the patriots will probably win because the fix is in, but i think it'll be a great game.

Author:  Nas [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 8:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

The Vikings defense was overrated. It's why I picked the Saints last week but Brees made some errors in the first half and God stepped in to help the Vikings.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 8:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Pats have never won a SB by more than 6. I don’t think they start now.


They'll win this one by 40. The Pats are going to study the hell out of Foles and beat his ass two weeks from now. Foles' only chance is to develop his left hand during these two weeks so he can throw the Pats off.
MANY said the Pats were going to cruise past Jacksonville as well. Did.Not.Happen.

FF is correct. The Pats may win, but it won't be by more than one score.

Author:  Nas [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 8:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

Frank Coztansa wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Pats have never won a SB by more than 6. I don’t think they start now.


They'll win this one by 40. The Pats are going to study the hell out of Foles and beat his ass two weeks from now. Foles' only chance is to develop his left hand during these two weeks so he can throw the Pats off.
MANY said the Pats were going to cruise past Jacksonville as well. Did.Not.Happen.

FF is correct. The Pats may win, but it won't be by more than one score.


Avatar bet?

Author:  RFDC [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

W_Z wrote:
how could anyone have watched both games yesterday and come to the conclusion that the eagles will be destroyed by the patriots? they just decimated the vikings, who had a better defense than the pats.

foles isn't wentz but he's proven that he's not a bum.

the patriots will probably win because the fix is in, but i think it'll be a great game.


:lol:

Author:  Caller Bob [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

Nas wrote:
The Vikings defense was overrated. It's why I picked the Saints last week but Brees made some errors in the first half and God stepped in to help the Vikings.


Cue FavreFan rage in 3...2...

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

Caller Bob wrote:
Nas wrote:
The Vikings defense was overrated. It's why I picked the Saints last week but Brees made some errors in the first half and God stepped in to help the Vikings.


Cue FavreFan rage in 3...2...

No rage. They had the best scoring defense in the NFL this year and the best third down defense in the NFL in 27 years. They were terrible yesterday, but that doesn't just erase how good they were throughout the regular season and how wrong you were on that.

Author:  Nas [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

They didn't really play anyone.

Author:  Ugueth Will Shiv You [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

This will be a 3-point game.

Author:  Caller Bob [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

FavreFan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Nas wrote:
The Vikings defense was overrated. It's why I picked the Saints last week but Brees made some errors in the first half and God stepped in to help the Vikings.


Cue FavreFan rage in 3...2...

No rage. They had the best scoring defense in the NFL this year and the best third down defense in the NFL in 27 years. They were terrible yesterday, but that doesn't just erase how good they were throughout the regular season and how wrong you were on that.


I never said they were a bad defense, I always maintained they were a bit overrated. And I was proven right.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

Nas wrote:
They didn't really play anyone.
You're talking about the Eagles, correct?

Author:  Nas [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
They didn't really play anyone.
You're talking about the Eagles, correct?


Vikings didn't really play MANY good to decent offenses during the season and capitalized off of teams with major injuries or that were just flat out bad on offense.

Author:  Ugueth Will Shiv You [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

Nas wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
They didn't really play anyone.
You're talking about the Eagles, correct?


Vikings didn't really play MANY good to decent offenses during the season and capitalized off of teams with major injuries or that were just flat out bad on offense.


That seems like too many things had to go their way for that to be a true statement.

Author:  Nas [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
Nas wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
They didn't really play anyone.
You're talking about the Eagles, correct?


Vikings didn't really play MANY good to decent offenses during the season and capitalized off of teams with major injuries or that were just flat out bad on offense.


That seems like too many things had to go their way for that to be a true statement.


It happens like that. Sometimes it's better to be lucky than good.

Author:  Caller Bob [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

Rhodes is easily a top 3 corner in the NFL....and they have two nice rushers in Hunder and Griffen. But they have zero pass rush up the middle. They never really replaced the production from Shariff Floyd. And outside of Barr(who is up and down himself) I'm not impressed with their linebackers. That's what Philly did, they stayed away from Rhodes and chewed them in the middle. That's why I was never sold in Minny's D.

Author:  W_Z [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 1:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Super Bowl

Caller Bob wrote:
Rhodes is easily a top 3 corner in the NFL....and they have two nice rushers in Hunder and Griffen. But they have zero pass rush up the middle. They never really replaced the production from Shariff Floyd. And outside of Barr(who is up and down himself) I'm not impressed with their linebackers. That's what Philly did, they stayed away from Rhodes and chewed them in the middle. That's why I was never sold in Minny's D.



Careful Bob, RF may mistake you for an Eagles fan with that kind of biased analysis.

Page 1 of 12 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/