Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic

Since the salary cap is fake the Packers should have kept Jones even after signing the Mediocre Jacobs

They overpaid to sign him.

Nas wrote:

They overpaid to sign him.

He’s a Top 5 safety, I don’t care.

Nas wrote:

They overpaid to sign him.

He’s a Top 5 safety, I don’t care.

Hawg Ass wrote:

This is beautiful:

https://x.com/mattschneidman/status/176 ... 00590?s=46

I explained to you how foolish it looked to make the argument last year but here you are doing it again.

good dolphin wrote:

Hawg Ass wrote:

This is beautiful:

https://x.com/mattschneidman/status/176 ... 00590?s=46

I explained to you how foolish it looked to make the argument last year but here you are doing it again.

You don’t like having young very good controllable talent on your team?

No wonder your team has sucked.

Hawg Ass wrote:

good dolphin wrote:

Hawg Ass wrote:

This is beautiful:

https://x.com/mattschneidman/status/176 ... 00590?s=46

I explained to you how foolish it looked to make the argument last year but here you are doing it again.

You don’t like having young very good controllable talent on your team?

No wonder your team has sucked.

I don't see anyone like that in your list, but that isn't the reason you cited it.

Hawg Ass wrote:

good dolphin wrote:

Hawg Ass wrote:

This is beautiful:

https://x.com/mattschneidman/status/176 ... 00590?s=46

I explained to you how foolish it looked to make the argument last year but here you are doing it again.

You don’t like having young very good controllable talent on your team?

No wonder your team has sucked.

I don't see anyone like that in your list, but that isn't the reason you cited it.

good dolphin wrote:

Hawg Ass wrote:

good dolphin wrote:

Hawg Ass wrote:

This is beautiful:

https://x.com/mattschneidman/status/176 ... 00590?s=46

I explained to you how foolish it looked to make the argument last year but here you are doing it again.

You don’t like having young very good controllable talent on your team?

No wonder your team has sucked.

I don't see anyone like that in your list, but that isn't the reason you cited it.

Well God Bless you because apparently you are the only human being that has this thought.

Hawg Ass wrote:

good dolphin wrote:

Hawg Ass wrote:

good dolphin wrote:

Hawg Ass wrote:

This is beautiful:

https://x.com/mattschneidman/status/176 ... 00590?s=46

I explained to you how foolish it looked to make the argument last year but here you are doing it again.

You don’t like having young very good controllable talent on your team?

No wonder your team has sucked.

I don't see anyone like that in your list, but that isn't the reason you cited it.

Well God Bless you because apparently you are the only human being that has this thought.

Poor Dolphin. He thought the pain would ease once Rodgers moved on, but now he knows it will continue for the foreseeable future.

Aren’t the Bears in catch up mode, they are the ones that have sucked the vast majority of your life.

Hawg Ass wrote:

Aren’t the Bears in catch up mode, they are the ones that have sucked the vast majority of your life.

Ditka was 15-5 against the Packers in the first half of my life. Neil Armstrong was 4-4. Jack Pardee was 5-1.

But I mean on the field.

Rome will be built in a day, on April 25. Or maybe, won't you be my Nabers.

Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:

Hawg Ass wrote:

good dolphin wrote:

Hawg Ass wrote:

good dolphin wrote:

I explained to you how foolish it looked to make the argument last year but here you are doing it again.

You don’t like having young very good controllable talent on your team?

No wonder your team has sucked.

I don't see anyone like that in your list, but that isn't the reason you cited it.

Well God Bless you because apparently you are the only human being that has this thought.

Poor Dolphin. He thought the pain would ease once Rodgers moved on, but now he knows it will continue for the foreseeable future.

You better hope GB drafts more offense because you'll be in perpetual catch up mode with Caleb starting in September.

To go from this

to Josh Jacobs :lol:

Nothing is more hilarious than when Pecker Nation tries to put lipstick on a pig.

Caller Bob wrote:

To go from this

to Josh Jacobs :lol:

Nothing is more hilarious than when Pecker Nation tries to put lipstick on a pig.

He's had more 4.0 YPC and under seasons as he has above.

The Packers don't even make the playoffs last year without Aaron Jones, who the best player in football the last month of the season.

Author:	Juiced [ Mon Mar 11, 2024 2:56 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
Caller Bob wrote: Since the salary cap is fake the Packers should have kept Jones even after signing the Mediocre Jacobs They all got together at the annual owners meeting at the cheese factory and decided to let Jones go. "The price of cheese has been falling since 2020 and a tough decision had to be made" said, Bertha McCheesehead. Cheese increased 0.02 USD/LBS or 1.48% since the beginning of 2024, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. Historically, Cheese reached an all time high of 2.59 in July of 2020.

Author:	Hawg Ass [ Mon Mar 11, 2024 3:05 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
Xavier McKinney to the Packers, yes!!!

Author:	Nas [ Mon Mar 11, 2024 3:12 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
They overpaid to sign him.

Author:	Hawg Ass [ Mon Mar 11, 2024 3:14 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
Nas wrote: They overpaid to sign him. He’s a Top 5 safety, I don’t care.

Author:	Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Mon Mar 11, 2024 3:19 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
Hawg Ass wrote: Nas wrote: They overpaid to sign him. He’s a Top 5 safety, I don’t care. They just got a lot better at their weakest position. Very nice!

Chicago Fanatics Message Board http://chicagofanatics.com/

Green Bay Packers http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=113803	Page 301 of 306

Author:	Nas [ Mon Mar 11, 2024 3:22 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
Hawg Ass wrote: Nas wrote: They overpaid to sign him. He’s a Top 5 safety, I don’t care. I'm joking. This was a great signing. They fear what C-Will is about to unleash on them.

Author:	Caller Bob [ Mon Mar 11, 2024 3:23 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
Top 5 safety yet not a single pro bowl or 1st or 2nd team all pro hmmmm

Author:	Hawg Ass [ Mon Mar 11, 2024 3:24 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
It is so weird seeing the Packers this active on Day 1 of free agency. Reporters have always joked they don’t have to worry about working today because nothing ever happens.

Author:	Caller Bob [ Mon Mar 11, 2024 3:45 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
awful money

Author:	Hawg Ass [ Mon Mar 11, 2024 3:46 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
4 for 48 for Jacobs, same contract they gave Jones at age 26.

Author:	Hawg Ass [ Mon Mar 11, 2024 3:50 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
Caller Bob wrote: :lol: awful money I mean he just was an All Pro and led the league in rushing, not exactly bad.

Author:	Hawg Ass [ Mon Mar 11, 2024 3:52 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
This is beautiful: https://x.com/mattschneidman/status/176 ... 00590?s=46

Author:	Hawg Ass [ Mon Mar 11, 2024 3:59 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
I am hearing Jacobs only got 12.5 guaranteed, if so, beautiful. 14.8 guaranteed for year 1, nothing beyond that. Caller Bob wrong again.

Author:	good dolphin [ Mon Mar 11, 2024 4:28 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
Hawg Ass wrote: This is beautiful: https://x.com/mattschneidman/status/176 ... 00590?s=46 I explained to you how foolish it looked to make the argument last year but here you are doing it again.

Page 301 of 306	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	Hawg Ass [ Mon Mar 11, 2024 4:31 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
good dolphin wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: This is beautiful: https://x.com/mattschneidman/status/176 ... 00590?s=46 I explained to you how foolish it looked to make the argument last year but here you are doing it again. You don’t like having young very good controllable talent on your team? No wonder your team has sucked.

Author:	good dolphin [ Mon Mar 11, 2024 5:14 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
Hawg Ass wrote: good dolphin wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: This is beautiful: https://x.com/mattschneidman/status/176 ... 00590?s=46 I explained to you how foolish it looked to make the argument last year but here you are doing it again. You don’t like having young very good controllable talent on your team? No wonder your team has sucked. I don't see anyone like that in your list, but that isn't the reason you cited it.

Author:	Hawg Ass [ Mon Mar 11, 2024 5:16 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
good dolphin wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: good dolphin wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: This is beautiful: https://x.com/mattschneidman/status/176 ... 00590?s=46 I explained to you how foolish it looked to make the argument last year but here you are doing it again. You don’t like having young very good controllable talent on your team? No wonder your team has sucked. I don't see anyone like that in your list, but that isn't the reason you cited it. Well God Bless you because apparently you are the only human being that has this thought.

Author:	Hawg Ass [ Mon Mar 11, 2024 5:18 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
good dolphin wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: good dolphin wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: This is beautiful: https://x.com/mattschneidman/status/176 ... 00590?s=46 I explained to you how foolish it looked to make the argument last year but here you are doing it again. You don’t like having young very good controllable talent on your team? No wonder your team has sucked. I don't see anyone like that in your list, but that isn't the reason you cited it. Also another reason your team has sucked, the evaluations aren’t good.

Author:	Brick [ Tue Mar 12, 2024 4:43 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
Oh good, another year where they act like having a bunch of 26 year old NFL players is remarkable.

Author:	good dolphin [ Tue Mar 12, 2024 6:58 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: good dolphin wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: good dolphin wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: This is beautiful: https://x.com/mattschneidman/status/176 ... 00590?s=46 I explained to you how foolish it looked to make the argument last year but here you are doing it again. You don’t like having young very good controllable talent on your team? No wonder your team has sucked. I don't see anyone like that in your list, but that isn't the reason you cited it. Well God Bless you because apparently you are the only human being that has this thought. Poor Dolphin. He thought the pain would ease once Rodgers moved on, but now he knows it will continue for the foreseeable future. You better hope GB drafts more offense because you'll be in perpetual catch up mode with Caleb starting in September.

Author:	Hawg Ass [ Tue Mar 12, 2024 7:15 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
Aren’t the Bears in catch up mode, they are the ones that have sucked the vast majority of your life.

Author:	good dolphin [ Tue Mar 12, 2024 7:37 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
Hawg Ass wrote: Aren’t the Bears in catch up mode, they are the ones that have sucked the vast majority of your life. Ditka was 15-5 against the Packers in the first half of my life. Neil Armstrong was 4-4. Jack Pardee was 5-1. But I mean on the field. Rome will be built in a day, on April 25. Or maybe, won't you be my Nabers.

Author:	Hawg Ass [ Tue Mar 12, 2024 7:40 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
good dolphin wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: Aren’t the Bears in catch up mode, they are the ones that have sucked the vast majority of your life. Ditka was 15-5 against the Packers in the first half of my life. Neil Armstrong was 4-4. Jack Pardee was 5-1. But I mean on the field. Rome will be built in a day, on April 25. Or maybe, won't you be my Nabers.

Author:	Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Tue Mar 12, 2024 7:43 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
good dolphin wrote: Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: good dolphin wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: good dolphin wrote: I explained to you how foolish it looked to make the argument last year but here you are doing it again. You don’t like having young very good controllable talent on your team? No wonder your team has sucked. I don't see anyone like that in your list, but that isn't the reason you cited it. Well God Bless you because apparently you are the only human being that has this thought. Poor Dolphin. He thought the pain would ease once Rodgers moved on, but now he knows it will continue for the foreseeable future. You better hope GB drafts more offense because you'll be in perpetual catch up mode with Caleb starting in September. I expect the Packers offense to be among the best in the league next season (barring injury to Love). The D needs to be better and they already filled a huge need. I expect that will be their focus in the draft although they will likely add an O-lineman early and a backup rb on day 3.

Author:	Caller Bob [ Tue Mar 12, 2024 8:58 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
To go from this to Josh Jacobs Nothing is more hilarious than when Pecker Nation tries to put lipstick on a pig.

Author:	good dolphin [ Tue Mar 12, 2024 9:03 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
Caller Bob wrote: To go from this to Josh Jacobs Nothing is more hilarious than when Pecker Nation tries to put lipstick on a pig. He's had more 4.0 YPC and under seasons as he has above.

Author:	Hawg Ass [ Tue Mar 12, 2024 9:07 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
good dolphin wrote: Caller Bob wrote: To go from this to Josh Jacobs Nothing is more hilarious than when Pecker Nation tries to put lipstick on a pig. He's had more 4.0 YPC and under seasons as he has above. And we will continue to beat the Bears, same shit different year.

Author:	Caller Bob [ Tue Mar 12, 2024 9:10 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
The Packers don't even make the playoffs last year without Aaron Jones, who the best player in football the last month of the season.

Author:	Hawg Ass [ Tue Mar 12, 2024 9:12 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Green Bay Packers
Caller Bob wrote: The Packers don't even make the playoffs last year without Aaron Jones, who the best player in football the last month of the season. He played well, as did the whole team.