Chicago Fanatics Message Board
http://chicagofanatics.com/

Green Bay Packers
http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=113803
Page 302 of 305

Author:  Nardi [ Tue Mar 12, 2024 10:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Nas wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Well you are no James Earl Jones that’s for sure.


Morgan Freeman?

Lovie could make a living doing it. Very soothing.

Author:  IkeSouth [ Sun Mar 17, 2024 5:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

IkeSouth wrote:
god dammit. we have a chance to get aaron rodgers. would you trade justin fields for rodgers right now? straight up? fuck, i might throw in 5 other players.


god dammit you son of a bitch

Author:  Nardi [ Sun Mar 17, 2024 7:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

IkeSouth wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
god dammit. we have a chance to get aaron rodgers. would you trade justin fields for rodgers right now? straight up? fuck, i might throw in 5 other players.


god dammit you son of a bitch

Wait until 3AM.

Author:  good dolphin [ Wed Mar 20, 2024 3:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Sure, NOW they do it

https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-will-consider-using-replay-to-review-whether-game-clock-expired-before-snap

next they will use replay to determine if OL started early now that Baktiari retired

Author:  Hawg Ass [ Wed Mar 20, 2024 4:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

good dolphin wrote:
Sure, NOW they do it

https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-will-consider-using-replay-to-review-whether-game-clock-expired-before-snap

next they will use replay to determine if OL started early now that Baktiari retired

You really need to stop this as it has been proven, time and time again how every team gets away with it.

Now, about Packers finishing 3rd in the division bet?

Author:  good dolphin [ Wed Mar 20, 2024 4:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Hawg Ass wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Sure, NOW they do it

https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-will-consider-using-replay-to-review-whether-game-clock-expired-before-snap

next they will use replay to determine if OL started early now that Baktiari retired

You really need to stop this as it has been proven, time and time again how every team gets away with it.

Now, about Packers finishing 3rd in the division bet?


I'm open to interesting terms.

You getting the field do not get 1:1 terms.

Author:  FavreFan [ Thu Mar 21, 2024 7:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

good dolphin wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Sure, NOW they do it

https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-will-consider-using-replay-to-review-whether-game-clock-expired-before-snap

next they will use replay to determine if OL started early now that Baktiari retired

You really need to stop this as it has been proven, time and time again how every team gets away with it.

Now, about Packers finishing 3rd in the division bet?


I'm open to interesting terms.

You getting the field do not get 1:1 terms.

Image

Author:  good dolphin [ Thu Mar 21, 2024 7:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Sure, NOW they do it

https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-will-consider-using-replay-to-review-whether-game-clock-expired-before-snap

next they will use replay to determine if OL started early now that Baktiari retired

You really need to stop this as it has been proven, time and time again how every team gets away with it.

Now, about Packers finishing 3rd in the division bet?


I'm open to interesting terms.

You getting the field do not get 1:1 terms.

Image


I'm not backpeddaling. I'm all booked up for cash with you. I stand by my thought but if I win only once out of four possible outcomes while you win with three out of four possible outcomes, nobody would book that as even

Author:  Hawg Ass [ Thu Mar 21, 2024 7:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Sure, NOW they do it

https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-will-consider-using-replay-to-review-whether-game-clock-expired-before-snap

next they will use replay to determine if OL started early now that Baktiari retired

You really need to stop this as it has been proven, time and time again how every team gets away with it.

Now, about Packers finishing 3rd in the division bet?


I'm open to interesting terms.

You getting the field do not get 1:1 terms.

Image


I'm not backpeddaling. I'm all booked up for cash with you. I stand by my thought but if I win only once out of four possible outcomes while you win with three out of four possible outcomes, nobody would book that as even

But you stated it so confidently, no way you need any odds.

Author:  IkeSouth [ Thu Mar 21, 2024 7:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

for many, many years, neither side cared about the playclock rules. balls used to get routinely snapped late in big games. if the game clock isnt running, who really fucking cares? its like saying we need replay to determine if a player doesnt put his helmet on fast enough while taking the field.

Author:  good dolphin [ Thu Mar 21, 2024 7:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Hawg Ass wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Sure, NOW they do it

https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-will-consider-using-replay-to-review-whether-game-clock-expired-before-snap

next they will use replay to determine if OL started early now that Baktiari retired

You really need to stop this as it has been proven, time and time again how every team gets away with it.

Now, about Packers finishing 3rd in the division bet?


I'm open to interesting terms.

You getting the field do not get 1:1 terms.

Image


I'm not backpeddaling. I'm all booked up for cash with you. I stand by my thought but if I win only once out of four possible outcomes while you win with three out of four possible outcomes, nobody would book that as even

But you stated it so confidently, no way you need any odds.


Right, that's how it works.

Author:  Brick [ Thu Mar 21, 2024 8:21 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Don't worry guys. Soon you'll have the chance to jump on the Jordan Love over/under bets!

Author:  Nardi [ Thu Mar 21, 2024 8:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Brick wrote:
Don't worry guys. Soon you'll have the chance to jump on the Jordan Love over/under bets!

C-

Author:  Hawg Ass [ Wed Apr 10, 2024 8:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Brazil wants to feel the LOVE, Pack opens the season against the Eagles.

Author:  Hawg Ass [ Tue Apr 23, 2024 3:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

5 picks in the first 100, I don’t see them making 5 picks. Where do they move up?

Author:  Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Tue Apr 23, 2024 9:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Hawg Ass wrote:
5 picks in the first 100, I don’t see them making 5 picks. Where do they move up?

Plus they have 11 overall, which is a waste on a team that is already young with a full complement of special teams filler from the 2023 draft. They absolutely will trade up at least twice. I see trading up a couple of slots for DeJean, then an OL and LB in 2nd round, Safety in 3rd, RB in 4th, then some edge with a high RAS from a small school, an underperforming fat bastard DT from a major program and finish with more filler. They will not make more than 7 picks.

Author:  Brick [ Wed Apr 24, 2024 6:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Yeah, but if they use all 11 picks you guys can brag all year that you have an average age of .7 less than the league median again!

Author:  Hawg Ass [ Wed Apr 24, 2024 10:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Brick wrote:
Yeah, but if they use all 11 picks you guys can brag all year that you have an average age of .7 less than the league median again!

Josh Jacobs is our oldest skill player on offense.

Author:  Hawg Ass [ Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Love the Cooper pick, not gonna lie. I may regret this post but I really believe he is a player.

Author:  Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Hawg Ass wrote:
Brick wrote:
Yeah, but if they use all 11 picks you guys can brag all year that you have an average age of .7 less than the league median again!

Josh Jacobs is our oldest skill player on offense.

Brick really seems to think that is a clever shot. The Packers are an ascending team with 1 starter older than 29…and he will be replaced after this season. They are getting better and younger. That’s a good combo.

Author:  Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Hawg Ass wrote:
Love the Cooper pick, not gonna lie. I may regret this post but I really believe he is a player.

Agreed. He looks like a stud.

Author:  Hawg Ass [ Fri Apr 26, 2024 8:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Ok, we have made our standard Georgia pick.

Author:  Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Fri Apr 26, 2024 8:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Hawg Ass wrote:
Ok, we have made our standard Georgia pick.

I actually like it. My only complaint is I feel like they could be more aggressive and nab another need rather than sitting back and hoping the guy they want falls to them.

Author:  Hawg Ass [ Fri Apr 26, 2024 8:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Ok, we have made our standard Georgia pick.

I actually like it. My only complaint is I feel like they could be more aggressive and nab another need rather than sitting back and hoping the guy they want falls to them.

They must feel confident there are certain positions that have players they want and will use those picks to move up. I just don’t see them using all of these picks and they got more.

Author:  Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Fri Apr 26, 2024 8:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Hawg Ass wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Ok, we have made our standard Georgia pick.

I actually like it. My only complaint is I feel like they could be more aggressive and nab another need rather than sitting back and hoping the guy they want falls to them.

They must feel confident there are certain positions that have players they want and will use those picks to move up. I just don’t see them using all of these picks and they got more.

I’d like the RB from Tennessee and a CB before the night is over.

Author:  Hawg Ass [ Fri Apr 26, 2024 8:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Ok, we have made our standard Georgia pick.

I actually like it. My only complaint is I feel like they could be more aggressive and nab another need rather than sitting back and hoping the guy they want falls to them.

They must feel confident there are certain positions that have players they want and will use those picks to move up. I just don’t see them using all of these picks and they got more.

I’d like the RB from Tennessee and a CB before the night is over.

In Gute, I trust.

Author:  Hawg Ass [ Sat Apr 27, 2024 10:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

No way in hell Gute uses 8 picks today, see where he decides to go.

Author:  Hawg Ass [ Sat Apr 27, 2024 10:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

The Packers had 22 players in 2023 that started a game that were either drafted on Day 3 or were unrestricted free agent signings.

Author:  IkeSouth [ Sat Apr 27, 2024 10:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

And they now all have tape on them

Author:  Urlacher's missing neck [ Sat Apr 27, 2024 8:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Michael Pratt and his Tulane team took down the chosen one Caleb when they played head to head? I am somehow not surprised.

Page 302 of 305 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/