Chicago Fanatics Message Board http://chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Green Bay Packers http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=82801 |
Page 24 of 28 |
Author: | America [ Sun Nov 20, 2016 11:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
I know we've down this path before a few times, but this really feels like the end of these Packers. So much dogshit on that roster, I know they are hurt but guys like Clay Matthews really dont belong in the league anymore and GB is paying him out the ass while not having NFL caliber players starting across the OL and secondary. |
Author: | newper [ Mon Nov 21, 2016 12:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
America wrote: I know we've down this path before a few times, but this really feels like the end of these Packers. So much dogshit on that roster, I know they are hurt but guys like Clay Matthews really dont belong in the league anymore and GB is paying him out the ass while not having NFL caliber players starting across the OL and secondary. It is a weird situation because I don't really believe the Vikes or Lions can take the division over, but I definitely agree the Pack is dead. We soon could be the land of the 8-8 playoff entry. |
Author: | veganfan21 [ Mon Nov 21, 2016 12:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Mon Nov 21, 2016 12:55 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
Kirkwood wrote: well, it was a good run. fire everyone. everyone is coming back. |
Author: | W_Z [ Mon Nov 21, 2016 7:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
Author: | good dolphin [ Mon Nov 21, 2016 9:33 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
I was sitting there in bed yesterday enjoying the hell out of the end of the game. My wife asked, why watching that? Are you gambling? While the answer may have been "yes", I don't understand how, after all these years, she wouldn't know that I enjoy watching the Packers lose. |
Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 10:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
These assholes are gonna "salvage" their season and go 9-7, get a horrible draft pick, and bring everyone back for next year. Fuck. |
Author: | leashyourkids [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 10:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
FavreFan wrote: These assholes are gonna "salvage" their season and go 9-7, get a horrible draft pick, and bring everyone back for next year. Fuck. You're a moron. No one gives a fuck what you think, pothead. |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
No. They still suck. |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Sun Dec 04, 2016 7:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
God Dammit. Stop winning. Buncha frauds. |
Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Dec 04, 2016 11:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
Kirkwood wrote: No. Yup |
Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 6:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
Told you KW. This is how they do. Gonna just barely miss the playoffs or get their ass kicked in the first round, bring everyone back, and do the same dumb shit next year. |
Author: | 312player [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 7:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
Are you goofs still blaming Rodgers and saying he's washed up? |
Author: | Urlacher's missing neck [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 7:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
God did work on Wilson today. 5 int's......just going to make it that much sweeter!! |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 7:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
312player wrote: Are you goofs still blaming Rodgers and saying he's washed up? Yes. Let the Hundley Era begin. |
Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 7:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
312player wrote: Are you goofs still blaming Rodgers and saying he's washed up? Nobody ever said he's washed up. Try again. |
Author: | Urlacher's missing neck [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 8:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
I didnt realize until I looked it up last night that he was 13th all time for td passes and well ahead of Montana. He might be 12th after today. |
Author: | RFDC [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 9:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
FavreFan wrote: 312player wrote: Are you goofs still blaming Rodgers and saying he's washed up? Nobody ever said he's washed up. Try again. you sure about that? FavreFan wrote: I've thought about making this thread for a year now. It was finally time. Didn't want to prematurely give up on my guy, but he's finished.
|
Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 9:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
RFDC wrote: FavreFan wrote: 312player wrote: Are you goofs still blaming Rodgers and saying he's washed up? Nobody ever said he's washed up. Try again. you sure about that? FavreFan wrote: I've thought about making this thread for a year now. It was finally time. Didn't want to prematurely give up on my guy, but he's finished. Where did I say he was washed up? Try again. |
Author: | RFDC [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 9:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
FavreFan wrote: RFDC wrote: FavreFan wrote: 312player wrote: Are you goofs still blaming Rodgers and saying he's washed up? Nobody ever said he's washed up. Try again. you sure about that? FavreFan wrote: I've thought about making this thread for a year now. It was finally time. Didn't want to prematurely give up on my guy, but he's finished. Where did I say he was washed up? Try again. So he is finished, but not yet washed up? |
Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 9:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
RFDC wrote: FavreFan wrote: RFDC wrote: FavreFan wrote: 312player wrote: Are you goofs still blaming Rodgers and saying he's washed up? Nobody ever said he's washed up. Try again. you sure about that? FavreFan wrote: I've thought about making this thread for a year now. It was finally time. Didn't want to prematurely give up on my guy, but he's finished. Where did I say he was washed up? Try again. So he is finished, but not yet washed up? Finished as a great QB. Did you even read the thread title? Try harder. |
Author: | RFDC [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 9:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
Nice try FF. You were extremely clear in your statement. He is finished. You did not want to say it prematurely. Now you want to backtrack on that. Its cool. 312 1 FF 0 |
Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 9:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
RFDC wrote: Nice try FF. You were extremely clear in your statement. He is finished. You did not want to say it prematurely. Now you want to backtrack on that. Its cool. 312 1 FF 0 This post suggests you don't know what backtrack means. |
Author: | RFDC [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 9:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
Author: | Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 9:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
Favrefan has been off his game lately. The White Sox have thrown him for a loop. We should cut him some slack. |
Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 9:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: Favrefan has been off his game lately. The White Sox have thrown him for a loop. We should cut him some slack. Alright I'll take you seriously. When I mean great, I mean clear cut top 3 in the NFL. I mean Rodgers is not what he was in the past 4-5 years. You're a packer fan. We can all equally attribute blame to TT, McCarthy, etc, but do you disagree with me? |
Author: | Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 9:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
Urlacher's missing neck wrote: I didnt realize until I looked it up last night that he was 13th all time for td passes and well ahead of Montana. He might be 12th after today. I was stunned today when they noted that Wilson was chasing...wait for it... Matt Ryan's W/L record for his 1st 5 years. Matt Ryan. I always thought he was sort of a tease. Never really gave him a thought as a top tier QB. |
Author: | Chus [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 10:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
Rodgers is still a top 3 QB. |
Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 10:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
Chus wrote: Rodgers is still a top 3 QB. No way. Not by the eye test and not by stats. |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 10:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Green Bay Packers |
RFDC wrote: What that's today's game? Nvm, that's Greg Jennings. |
Page 24 of 28 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |