Chicago Fanatics Message Board
http://chicagofanatics.com/

Green Bay Packers
http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=82801
Page 25 of 28

Author:  Chus [ Sun Dec 11, 2016 10:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

FavreFan wrote:
Chus wrote:
Rodgers is still a top 3 QB.

No way. Not by the eye test and not by stats.


Brady
Stafford
Rodgers

:wink:

Author:  Powerhouse233 [ Mon Dec 12, 2016 1:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

FavreFan wrote:
Chus wrote:
Rodgers is still a top 3 QB.

No way. Not by the eye test and not by stats.


No way? That's way too strong a reaction. Also, the eye test thing is bullshit and means absolutely nothing. As far as the numbers are concerned 32 touchdowns, only 7 interceptions, 65.1 completion percentage, 101.1 quarter back rating and over 3500 yards. He's easily having one of the best seasons of any quarterback in the NFL. To say he's one of the three best QB's right now is not really going out on a limb.

Author:  Zizou [ Mon Dec 12, 2016 1:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

I'm not sold. Wilson had a historically awful day. Seattle stinks on the road. Lots of short fields. Ty Fucking Montgomery is still the running back.

Author:  Kirkwood [ Mon Dec 12, 2016 2:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Zizou wrote:
I'm not sold. Wilson had a historically awful day. Seattle stinks on the road. Lots of short fields. Ty Fucking Montgomery is still the running back.

It's the same shit every year.

They'll win wild card weekend and then lose in the divisional round from a player doing something stupid or a McCarthy coaching like a pussy.

Author:  312player [ Mon Dec 12, 2016 2:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Nobody in the NFC scares ya, they will win a WC or maybe the division if they win out, easy schedule... Seattle is done without Earl Thomas, Dallas is fools gold.

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Dec 12, 2016 2:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

They aren't going to make the playoffs.

Author:  Kirkwood [ Sun Dec 18, 2016 4:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

4 turnovers and the defense still almost blew the game.

Fucking Capers. The cocksucker has more lives than Rasputin.

Author:  leashyourkids [ Sun Dec 18, 2016 4:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Kirkwood wrote:
4 turnovers and the defense still almost blew the game.

Fucking Capers. The cocksucker has more lives than Rasputin.


In fairness, they were trying to contain Matt Barkley.

Author:  Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Sun Dec 18, 2016 10:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Kirkwood wrote:
4 turnovers and the defense still almost blew the game.

Fucking Capers. The cocksucker has more lives than Rasputin.

I have my issues with Capers but dropped passes and missed tackles kept it close.

Author:  Urlacher's missing neck [ Sun Dec 18, 2016 10:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

His no pressure zone bullshit had alot to do with the game today.

Author:  leashyourkids [ Sun Dec 18, 2016 10:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
His no pressure zone bullshit had alot to do with the game today.


You seem upset about this soft zone.

Author:  Urlacher's missing neck [ Sun Dec 18, 2016 10:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

The only zone i want is the danger zone...via the highway.

Author:  leashyourkids [ Sun Dec 18, 2016 10:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
The only zone i want is the danger zone...via the highway.


Hey, I get it. We had to watch Tampa 2 for a decade.

Author:  Kirkwood [ Mon Dec 19, 2016 9:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
4 turnovers and the defense still almost blew the game.

Fucking Capers. The cocksucker has more lives than Rasputin.

I have my issues with Capers but dropped passes and missed tackles kept it close.

Damarious Randall. Good lord. Suuuuuuuuucksssss

Gunter has good size but dammit so many WRs run past him. Pack are fortunate to have 2 competent safeties.

Author:  good dolphin [ Mon Dec 19, 2016 10:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Kirkwood wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
4 turnovers and the defense still almost blew the game.

Fucking Capers. The cocksucker has more lives than Rasputin.

I have my issues with Capers but dropped passes and missed tackles kept it close.

Damarious Randall. Good lord. Suuuuuuuuucksssss

Gunter has good size but dammit so many WRs run past him. Pack are fortunate to have 2 competent safeties.


Clinton Dix, meet Jordan Howard dicks

That dickhead was showboating all day. He waved his finger on some deep pass in which he was beat but the QB was inaccurate. It was incredibly satisfying to watch Howard push his shit in on that TD run soon after.

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Dec 19, 2016 10:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Clinton Dix is great. Don't be mad that he's better than any safety the Bears have had in a decade.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Mon Dec 19, 2016 7:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Dix is great, but Rodgers is no longer great.

Makes zero sense.

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Jan 09, 2017 12:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Next time just don't make the road to the title so ugly.

Author:  Urlacher's missing neck [ Mon Jan 09, 2017 1:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Why must TT get stars from day 3 and UDFA and guys from day 1.

Author:  312player [ Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Gotta draft a RB, cut Peppers, Matthews and Dom Capers.

Author:  Zizou [ Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

I don't feel as bad about this loss. Just about every other playoff defeat under McCarthy has been a gut-wrenching nightmare. However, having another deep playoff run will allow the same shit to continue with the defense and front office.

Author:  Kirkwood [ Thu Mar 09, 2017 9:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Packers re-sign Nick Perry for 5 years.

Fire Thompson already. God dammit.

Author:  Hawg Ass [ Thu Mar 09, 2017 10:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Kirkwood wrote:
Packers re-sign Nick Perry for 5 years.

Fire Thompson already. God dammit.

That scares the shit out of me.

Author:  Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Thu Mar 09, 2017 11:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Kirkwood wrote:
Packers re-sign Nick Perry for 5 years.

Fire Thompson already. God dammit.

Perry played well last season and is in his prime. If he left that would have created a huge need in an area they are already thin. I'd rather keep him and fill existing holes through the draft and possibly free agency.

Author:  Hawg Ass [ Thu Mar 09, 2017 11:13 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Packers re-sign Nick Perry for 5 years.

Fire Thompson already. God dammit.

Perry played well last season and is in his prime. If he left that would have created a huge need in an area they are already thin. I'd rather keep him and fill existing holes through the draft and possibly free agency.

In theory, I don't disagree with this. My concern with him is his injuries, he has been quite ouchy so far. I hope they front load it so that in case after 2 years it is a bad deal, they can get out from underneath it.

Author:  FavreFan [ Thu Mar 09, 2017 4:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

He was the only guy on the team who could rush the passer last year. I'd hate to see what the team looks like without him. They need to get an edge rusher in the first round this year though.

Author:  good dolphin [ Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

so ends the career of Fat Boy Eddie

Author:  Hawg Ass [ Tue Mar 14, 2017 4:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

good dolphin wrote:
so ends the career of Fat Boy Eddie

Seattle must still see something good in him, I wanted him back but not for $5 million.

Author:  RFDC [ Tue Mar 14, 2017 4:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

I read some blurb about him showing up to a contract talk meeting with GB at a really high weight.

Author:  Hawg Ass [ Tue Mar 14, 2017 4:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Green Bay Packers

RFDC wrote:
I read some blurb about him showing up to a contract talk meeting with GB at a really high weight.

One of the 3 teams he visited weighed him, he weighed a smooth 267.

Page 25 of 28 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/