It is currently Wed Apr 17, 2024 10:11 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 103 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 7:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40984
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Owner of the St. Louis Rams plans to build an NFL stadium in Inglewood, which could pave the way for the league's return to Los Angeles.

Rams owner Stan Kroenke, who bought 60 acres adjacent to the Forum a year ago, has joined forces with the owners of the 238-acre Hollywood Park site, Stockbridge Capital Group. They plan to add an 80,000-seat NFL stadium and 6,000-seat performance venue to the already-massive development of retail, office, hotel and residential space, Stockbridge and the Kroenke Group told The Times.

Image

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 7:12 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77043
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Goodell said no to any idea of relocating until at least next season.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 7:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
I'm curious how the stadium will be paid for.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 9:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 39686
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Kirkwood wrote:
I'm curious how the stadium will be paid for.



I read privately. Not sure if all his cash though.

_________________
Brick wrote:
Biden is doing a GOOD job.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54227
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Nas wrote:
Goodell said no to any idea of relocating until at least next season.

Yeah, Goodell says a lot of things.

This is great. An NFL without that shitty dome and the 500 people who like the St. Louis Rams is a better NFL.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
It will take about 2 years to build the stadium once it gets approvals --- so like 3-4 years. Rams are on a year-by-year lease. Probably won't move until the new stadium is ready.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 11:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54227
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Why would they stay in St. Louis as a lame duck? They'll play at the Rose Bowl till Inglewood is ready. I wouldn't be surprised if the gears start turning right now.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Curious Hair wrote:
Why would they stay in St. Louis as a lame duck? They'll play at the Rose Bowl till Inglewood is ready. I wouldn't be surprised if the gears start turning right now.


No way residents around the Rose Bowl allow that.

The best they could hope for is to share the Coliseum with USC.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54227
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
I'm not sure that the Coliseum is an option. USC controls it now. My guess is the Rose Bowl. They won't stay in St. Louis any longer than they have to.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
Might as well just make it happen today. The sooner I can stop pretending to be a Rams fan the better...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54227
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
lipidquadcab wrote:
Might as well just make it happen today. The sooner I can stop pretending to be a Rams fan the better...

They really should. Kroenke just poisoned the well. He didn't say he was meeting in Los Angeles to discuss funding for a stadium. He said he's building a stadium. Short of a palace with 100-percent taxpayer funding, St. Louis is finished. No one will miss them. It's a city for baseball, hockey, and even some Catholic college hoops. They don't need and can't support the NFL.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16485
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Nas wrote:
Goodell said no to any idea of relocating until at least next season.


Well yea...the new stadium isnt built yet.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10550
Location: Lindenhurst
pizza_Place: 1. Aurelio's 2. Pizano's
The NFL and LA are an interesting study. This whole mess started when the Rams shot themselves by moving to Anaheim. Anaheim is not LA and never will be.

It's sad that St. Louis wasn't smart enough to protect themselves from this when the Rams moved there.

Jacksonville is easily the city that should lose their NFL franchise, but the State of FL was very wise contractually with all of their deals involving professional sports teams.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 26441
it looks better than soldiers feild

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55767
lipidquadcab wrote:
Might as well just make it happen today. The sooner I can stop pretending to be a Rams fan the better...

With the exception of a few, this seems like the opinion of most of the St Louis fans I know. No matter what happens with the NFL in St Louis the town will always be way more of a Cardinal and Blues town. And the majority of the state pulls for the Chiefs.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10550
Location: Lindenhurst
pizza_Place: 1. Aurelio's 2. Pizano's
Looked into this stadium plan and the location....interesting.

Rewind back to 1980...the Rams moved from the LA Coliseum to Anaheim. The Raiders were still in Oakland. For those of you not familiar with Southern California, this is the equivalent of the moving the Bears out of Chicago to Naperville. it did not go well. Add in the fact that by the mid-80's, the quality of teams fielded by the Rams started to fade.

the Raiders moved to the LA Coliseum in 1982 and overnight became THE team of Los Angeles. Sure, Anaheim and Orange County are a fine area, but it's very different from LA.

My point is that this proposed stadium plan is quite a ways inland...it's about as LA as Anaheim. This may work since they have been without a team for so long, but it's not ideal.

LA is a strange city and people are different, but they do love their football and the NFL allowed two owners to screw them over. I think the NFL carelessly figured they could get a team there easily and missed badly.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54227
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Inglewood is firmly within Los Angeles County. Hollywood Park is only five miles southwest of the LA Coliseum as the crow flies, which by Los Angeles standards is nothing. They'll play across the street from where the Lakers and Kings played for thirty years, so I don't think there's going to be a problem with identification. Do you have a better site in mind?

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10550
Location: Lindenhurst
pizza_Place: 1. Aurelio's 2. Pizano's
I was mistaken and looking at the old proposed site out in Diamond Bar.

Hollywood Park is a great location.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22706
pizza_Place: A few...
It's no Soldier Field but it looks ok.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54227
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
The Rams have officially told St. Louis that they're exercising the option to play in St. Louis on a year-to-year basis. Meanwhile in Inglewood, residents are petitioning for a referendum that would put the zoning on Hollywood Park to a vote, presumably to vote for it to be zoned "stadium" or whatever.

When people in another city are petitioning to facilitate a sports team's relocation, it's all over. Welcome back, Los Angeles Rams.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 7:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40984
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Its LA, if they attach a mall to the stadium it will be voted for and to be honest, not a terrible idea!

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10550
Location: Lindenhurst
pizza_Place: 1. Aurelio's 2. Pizano's
Lots happening...
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/nfl- ... eague.html

The Rams want to move to Inglewood. Raiders and Chargers holding their current cities hostage and pushing hard for a different LA location in Carson.

My prediction....Rams and Raiders both return to LA...Chargers stay in San Diego.

I've been to Carson...shit hole. It's next to Compton, but also borders Torrance which is pretty decent.

For sure, tough, it appears the NFL will be back in LA 2016.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 18943
NFL still owes the Rams a favor for drafting Michael Sam.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:30 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 9:58 am
Posts: 4456
Location: @ ROH Show Near Me.
pizza_Place: Freezer.
Send the Raiders to St Louis. Chargers can go to Louisville. All sorted!

_________________
Middle Aged Crazy, like Uncle Terry


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16485
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
wdelaney72 wrote:
Lots happening...
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/nfl- ... eague.html

The Rams want to move to Inglewood. Raiders and Chargers holding their current cities hostage and pushing hard for a different LA location in Carson.

My prediction....Rams and Raiders both return to LA...Chargers stay in San Diego.

I've been to Carson...shit hole. It's next to Compton, but also borders Torrance which is pretty decent.

For sure, tough, it appears the NFL will be back in LA 2016.


My very first business trip as a young up and comer was to Carson, Ca. In 1985 and it was a shithole then. Stayed in a Best Western and actally wedged the chair under the door handle.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 8:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10550
Location: Lindenhurst
pizza_Place: 1. Aurelio's 2. Pizano's
Inglewood is also a shithole, so they'd have 2 NFL arenas in 2 shitholes.

LA is a weird city. The downtown area is nothing...it's tiny. It's just a city with 20 Naperville sized suburbs all connected.

The biggest crime here is St. Louis went out of their way to bring the Rams in...gave them their stadium only to have the NFL and a new owner tell them to get bent. The Rams should have never left in the first place, but they shot themselves when they moved to Anaheim. LA and Orange County are just 2 different areas.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 8:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54227
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
wdelaney72 wrote:
The biggest crime here is St. Louis went out of their way to bring the Rams in...gave them their stadium only to have the NFL and a new owner tell them to get bent. The Rams should have never left in the first place, but they shot themselves when they moved to Anaheim. LA and Orange County are just 2 different areas.


Oh, St. Louis gets no sympathy. Their stadium sucks. I hope the Rams move back after this year.

EDIT: Kroenke isn't a new owner per se; he owned half the team from day one in St. Louis. He had right of first refusal on the Rosenbloom family's shares, which is why Shahid Khan had to settle for the Jaguars.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10550
Location: Lindenhurst
pizza_Place: 1. Aurelio's 2. Pizano's
Their stadium sucks? It was good enough for the Rams to move there in the first place. I've been to that stadium. It's a dome...nice concessions, bathrooms, concourses, but it's still a dome which translates to football in a garage.

My problem is with the team and the NFL absolutely ramming a pole up the fans ass. Here's a team...oh....there goes your team.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54227
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Don't blame the team or the league (which hasn't exactly fast-tracked this relocation like I thought they would), blame the St. Louis convention commission for writing up a short-sighted dumbshit lease wherein the Rams could void the lease if the stadium, which St. Louis built on the cheap, no longer made the 50th percentile in various stadium rankings. What did they expect was going to happen? Wait, I know the answer, they expected that the owner wouldn't care because she killed her husband to get the team out to St. Louis in the first place. They didn't budget for some creepy recluse just wanting to turn money into more money.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LA RAMS....again
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2015 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54227
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
St. Louis is gavaging this stadium deal down the public's throats, it would appear:
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt ... b46e2.html

Quote:
St. Louis Circuit Court Judge Thomas Frawley declared invalid the city ordinance requiring a public vote. Moreover, Frawley ruled, the placement of the new stadium, along the riverfront just north of downtown, does not break a state law requiring the building to be “adjacent” to the convention center — it is close enough, he wrote.

“‘Adjacent’ has commonly been interpreted by Missouri courts to mean ‘near or close at hand,’” Frawley wrote in his ruling — and not necessarily, he continued, “touching each other.”

Proponents quietly promoted the new victory. Dave Peacock, one of Gov. Jay Nixon’s stadium task force members, praised the legal team as “extraordinary,” and called for “everyone in the St. Louis region” to rally behind the new stadium.

“The court’s opinion is a victory for a bold and promising future for the NFL in St. Louis and the continued rebirth of our downtown,” Peacock said in a statement.

“We can make it happen,” he continued.


This Peacock guy is a piece of shit. He's not putting any money into this! He's just some Anheuser-Busch executive in charge with rounding up other people's money, particularly people who haven't agreed to have their money spent. Don't tell people they need to get behind this, and don't praise the lawyers who got some crooked judge to agree that "adjacent" means "somewhere relatively nearby." They're going to look really stupid if Kroenke just moves the team anyway, which he can. The NFL should let him; shitty little St. Louis is not a hill worth dying on.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 103 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group