The league pays homage to KD....it gets so bad 'Bron calls someone a nut for the very 1st time ever

Looking forward to Steph continuing to dominate Kyrie. It's amazing to me that some people actually think Kyrie is better

Curry ducking is not necessary domination. Can't let your bias get the best of you. Once Curry ran scared it ended the matchup. He is a yellow belly sap sucking coward. A man with no honor. No integrity. Gutless.

I'm not biased here. I don't even necessarily like Curry but it's plainly obviously he's way better than Kyrie. Didn't you want to judge John Wall vs Butler on All NBA teams and MVP votes?

Curry would be fine against Irving. Neither of them has a prayer of guarding anyone but Curry is the better offensive player by every metric.

It's hilarious that you are still arguing a 7 game sample size is more relevant than a 300+ game sample size

Mine is based on them actually playing against one another which is always truer metric. Yours is based on Curry dominating guys like Jerian Grant.

When they play eachother Steph has better career numbers as well. They aren't even close to eachother. Every single person who knows basketball would take Curry over Kyrie. It's not a close comparison.

Let's see who does better tonight. Cavs need Kyrie to step up. 10-22 shooting, 2 assists and 4 turnovers isn't gonna cut it

I like Chris Paul but I don't need him or any other player to tell me what matters. I know basketball. All that matters at the end of the game is how much you produced overall, both sides of the ball included. JR Smith scored 3 points in Game 1. Steph scored 28. Steph also had 10 assists, 6 rebounds, 3 steals, and only 2 turnovers. The eye test also showed that he and Durant were absolutely killing the Cavs. Whatever metric or criteria you want to go by, Steph was undeniably better than Kyrie in Game 1. Denying that just makes you lose credibility. It's not really a debateble topic.

I like Chris Paul but I don't need him or any other player to tell me what matters. I know basketball. All that matters at the end of the game is how much you produced overall, both sides of the ball included. JR Smith scored 3 points in Game 1. Steph scored 28. Steph also had 10 assists, 6 rebounds, 3 steals, and only 2 turnovers. The eye test also showed that he and Durant were absolutely killing the Cavs. Whatever metric or criteria you want to go by, Steph was undeniably better than Kyrie in Game 1. Denying that just makes you lose credibility. It's not really a debateble topic.

There's no refusing about it. It's simply not part of the game plan. If Steph and Kyrie switched teams Kyrie would be guarding JR as well. You're clinging to this nonsense because on the court and in the box score Curry dominates him.

It wasn't settled. They're currently playing eachother for another title. Through 4.5 quarters Curry is clearly the better player.

The better player is guarding J.R. Smith though he is the same size. Irving won a championship by dominating Curry.might actually win this one too. Cleveland will make this a series.

Curry is padding his stats with dumb fouls by Cleveland.

Not sure if youre watching but Curry has guarded Kyrie on over half the possessions so far

No he hasn't.