Chicago Fanatics Message Board
http://chicagofanatics.com/

Bronny James
http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=91&t=123849		 Page 7 of 7
Author:  W_Z [ Tue Jul 25, 2023 3:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
he got beat up by cocaine.
Author:  Bagels [ Tue Jul 25, 2023 3:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
at the end of the day, it's a learning experience.
Author:  pittmike [ Tue Jul 25, 2023 4:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
He’s taking his talents to the ER.
Author:  W_Z [ Tue Jul 25, 2023 5:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
Bagels wrote:
at the end of the day, it's a learning experience.


Everything happens for a reason.
Author:  Nardi [ Tue Jul 25, 2023 5:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
Brick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Brick wrote:
I didn't get a booster because Omicron made it pointless so I never would have mentioned my risk of the vaccine booster I never took.


Where did the scientists make this statement?

They have made it clear Omicron is not very dangerous except for the most vulnerable.

Yes, the vaccine after Omnicron was much more dangerous. As I alone stated and will get no pushback from. Can I get an apology?

You seem pretty triggered by the fact you chose a poor angle of attack on me and my thoughts on the COVID vaccine.

I'm pissed I'm not getting the predicted pushback.
Author:  Brick [ Tue Jul 25, 2023 5:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
I was mocking the people who wouldn't accept that argument. Seacrest at least tried. The others stayed silent.
Author:  Nardi [ Tue Jul 25, 2023 5:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
Brick wrote:
I was mocking the people who wouldn't accept that argument. Seacrest at least tried. The others stayed silent.

Because it was a different argument.
Author:  Brick [ Tue Jul 25, 2023 5:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
I was mocking the people who wouldn't accept that argument. Seacrest at least tried. The others stayed silent.

Because it was a different argument.

Nardi wrote:
It's AT least a solid decision to not keep getting jabs because COVID gets weaker and weaker.

This is the exact same argument I made on why I didn't get the booster.

I get it bothers you that you made the same argument I made but it should really make you feel like you made a solid point instead.
Author:  Nardi [ Tue Jul 25, 2023 6:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
Brick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
I was mocking the people who wouldn't accept that argument. Seacrest at least tried. The others stayed silent.

Because it was a different argument.

Nardi wrote:
It's AT least a solid decision to not keep getting jabs because COVID gets weaker and weaker.

This is the exact same argument I made on why I didn't get the booster.

I get it bothers you that you made the same argument I made but it should really make you feel like you made a solid point instead.

Now you're lowering yourself to cutting up quotes. You didn't get the jab because of increasing odds of myocarditis vs the virus. You didn't get it because the virus was weaker. You weren't the least bit concerned about myocarditis. You said the chances were 'remarkably' low. I SAID the chances go up with each jab. You had hundreds of posts to make this point and you never did.

Now go get your shinebox.
Author:  Bagels [ Tue Jul 25, 2023 7:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
I really hope Bernstein takes a break from Northwestern tomorrow to play doctor and break this down for us. It could be great
Author:  Seacrest [ Tue Jul 25, 2023 8:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
Brick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Brick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
They are still telling people to get boosters.
The CDC recommends a lot of things. I ignore plenty of those recommendations.

Seacrest wrote:
I'm glad you wised up, but let's try a little less bullshit here.
I'm sorry you don't seem to make your own health decisions but I do.


You took a vaccine because they told you to.

And you repeatedly alleged that it was tested properly when it clearly was not.

So again, a little less bullshit.

I took one because I chose to take it. I would do it again if I thought it was needed.


You took an uneducated guess based on false info you considered scientific, with no data to support it.

And now you know it wasn't needed, so you walked away from the boosters.
Author:  Darkside [ Tue Jul 25, 2023 8:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
Seacrest wrote:

You took an uneducated guess based on false info you considered scientific, with no data to support it

I mean... that's kinda funny. Ain't it?
Author:  Brick [ Tue Jul 25, 2023 8:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
I was mocking the people who wouldn't accept that argument. Seacrest at least tried. The others stayed silent.

Because it was a different argument.

Nardi wrote:
It's AT least a solid decision to not keep getting jabs because COVID gets weaker and weaker.

This is the exact same argument I made on why I didn't get the booster.

I get it bothers you that you made the same argument I made but it should really make you feel like you made a solid point instead.

Now you're lowering yourself to cutting up quotes. You didn't get the jab because of increasing odds of myocarditis vs the virus. You didn't get it because the virus was weaker. You weren't the least bit concerned about myocarditis. You said the chances were 'remarkably' low. I SAID the chances go up with each jab. You had hundreds of posts to make this point and you never did.

Now go get your shinebox.

I have at least 10 quotes explaining I didn't get a booster because Omicron was weaker thanks to Spaulding and others. This is a terrible hill for you to die on.
Author:  Brick [ Tue Jul 25, 2023 8:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
Seacrest wrote:
Brick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Brick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
They are still telling people to get boosters.
The CDC recommends a lot of things. I ignore plenty of those recommendations.

Seacrest wrote:
I'm glad you wised up, but let's try a little less bullshit here.
I'm sorry you don't seem to make your own health decisions but I do.


You took a vaccine because they told you to.

And you repeatedly alleged that it was tested properly when it clearly was not.

So again, a little less bullshit.

I took one because I chose to take it. I would do it again if I thought it was needed.


You took an uneducated guess based on false info you considered scientific, with no data to support it.

And now you know it wasn't needed, so you walked away from the boosters.

Yet you won't respond to anything I said and instead invent random gibberish that doesn't even get to any logical point.

I am talking to the guy who got a monoclonal antibody treatment that was just as experimental in treating COVID. You lose this one. Don't be a Nardi and double down.
Author:  Spaulding [ Tue Jul 25, 2023 9:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
Brick wrote:
I have at least 10 quotes explaining I didn't get a booster because Omicron was weaker thanks to Spaulding and others. This is a terrible hill for you to die on.


You should go get a booster. They are safe and effective and recommended by experts.
Author:  Nardi [ Tue Jul 25, 2023 9:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
He knows every time he boosts, the odds go up for myocarditis. Apparently, that bit of info was implied in the 10 quotes.
Author:  Seacrest [ Tue Jul 25, 2023 10:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
Brick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Brick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Brick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
They are still telling people to get boosters.
The CDC recommends a lot of things. I ignore plenty of those recommendations.

Seacrest wrote:
I'm glad you wised up, but let's try a little less bullshit here.
I'm sorry you don't seem to make your own health decisions but I do.


You took a vaccine because they told you to.

And you repeatedly alleged that it was tested properly when it clearly was not.

So again, a little less bullshit.

I took one because I chose to take it. I would do it again if I thought it was needed.


You took an uneducated guess based on false info you considered scientific, with no data to support it.

And now you know it wasn't needed, so you walked away from the boosters.

Yet you won't respond to anything I said and instead invent random gibberish that doesn't even get to any logical point.

I am talking to the guy who got a monoclonal antibody treatment that was just as experimental in treating COVID. You lose this one. Don't be a Nardi and double down.


Antibodies have been used for over 100 years. :lol:
https://absoluteantibody.com/antibody-r ... imals%20(4).

Glad to help you more with science.
Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Tue Jul 25, 2023 10:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
What science did your wife use when she set up an appointment for a medical procedure you didn't want or need?
Author:  Ron Wolfley [ Wed Jul 26, 2023 2:01 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
I know paxlovid is the more mainstream treatment any pharmacist can give you but the monoclonal procedure is the treatment you need a doctor's referral for, correct? My immunocompromised mom got all her shots but also looked into that antibody infusion in the event she were to get Covid. I remember her saying there were restrictions (such as age) and the availability was very limited because of cost
Author:  Brick [ Wed Jul 26, 2023 5:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
Seacrest wrote:

Antibodies have been used for over 100 years. :lol:
https://absoluteantibody.com/antibody-r ... imals%20(4).

Glad to help you more with science.

Vaccines have been around a while too. The treatment you got was created after COVID too!
Author:  Douchebag [ Wed Jul 26, 2023 7:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
Brick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:

Antibodies have been used for over 100 years. :lol:
https://absoluteantibody.com/antibody-r ... imals%20(4).

Glad to help you more with science.

Vaccines have been around a while too. The treatment you got was created after COVID too!

They've been around since the 80s when they were invented by Dr. Robert Malone.
Author:  This Ends in Antioch [ Wed Jul 26, 2023 8:00 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
Douchebag wrote:
Brick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:

Antibodies have been used for over 100 years. :lol:
https://absoluteantibody.com/antibody-r ... imals%20(4).

Glad to help you more with science.

Vaccines have been around a while too. The treatment you got was created after COVID too!

They've been around since the 80s when they were invented by Dr. Robert Malone.

But sadly lost for decades when UPS misplaced an envelope.
Author:  Seacrest [ Wed Jul 26, 2023 8:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
Brick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:

Antibodies have been used for over 100 years. :lol:
https://absoluteantibody.com/antibody-r ... imals%20(4).

Glad to help you more with science.

Vaccines have been around a while too. The treatment you got was created after COVID too!


Yeah, I'm aware that I took the tested, scientific path.

You rolled the dice, I'm glad it worked out for you.
Author:  Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Wed Jul 26, 2023 8:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
Beardown wrote:
Cocaine


Yeah, I gotta go with Beardown on this.

Also he's too short. No way he is 6'3".
Author:  Brick [ Wed Jul 26, 2023 10:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
Seacrest wrote:
Brick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:

Antibodies have been used for over 100 years. :lol:
https://absoluteantibody.com/antibody-r ... imals%20(4).

Glad to help you more with science.

Vaccines have been around a while too. The treatment you got was created after COVID too!


Yeah, I'm aware that I took the tested, scientific path.

You rolled the dice, I'm glad it worked out for you.

When was the COVID-19 monoclonal antibody treatment invented? Was it prior to COVID-19 existing?
Author:  Ron Wolfley [ Wed Sep 06, 2023 12:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
Ron Wolfley wrote:
I know paxlovid is the more mainstream treatment any pharmacist can give you but the monoclonal procedure is the treatment you need a doctor's referral for, correct? My immunocompromised mom got all her shots but also looked into that antibody infusion in the event she were to get Covid. I remember her saying there were restrictions (such as age) and the availability was very limited because of cost


A lot of bullshit and I told you so written here the last couple pages before knowing what the fuck actually happened.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2023/08/26/bronny-james-has-congenital-heart-defect-probable-cause-of-his-cardiac-arrest/?sh=76fd96bf4e4a
Author:  Ron Wolfley [ Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:58 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bronny James
Ron Wolfley wrote:
A lot of bullshit and I told you so written here the last couple pages before knowing what the fuck actually happened.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2023/08/26/bronny-james-has-congenital-heart-defect-probable-cause-of-his-cardiac-arrest/?sh=76fd96bf4e4a
Page 7 of 7 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/