It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 10:48 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 169 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55804
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
So you think Draymond could check the big men from that era as well as Rodman, Hakeem? No way in the world

Payton, Jordan, and Pippen could do just fine playing D in todays league.

Doing just fine and being a top 2 defensive player two years in a row is not the same thing. So hakeem would've been better at guarding centers? Ok. Draymond would be better at guarding every other position on the floor.

All 5 of those guys could be DPOY in todays league. It is silly to think otherwise.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
RFDC wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Maybe, but if a team could find a big man who was dominant, it would be a huge game changer. It's a market inefficiency, if you will.

I don't think so. It's hard to find a guy who can put up much better numbers than Anthony Davis has. Hasn't helped his team a whole lot. You need great guard play to compete today.

I just cannot believe some of the things I read around here.

Same here

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
RFDC wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
So you think Draymond could check the big men from that era as well as Rodman, Hakeem? No way in the world

Payton, Jordan, and Pippen could do just fine playing D in todays league.

Doing just fine and being a top 2 defensive player two years in a row is not the same thing. So hakeem would've been better at guarding centers? Ok. Draymond would be better at guarding every other position on the floor.

All 5 of those guys could be DPOY in todays league. It is silly to think otherwise.

They could be. Who knows? Draymond Green is.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Maybe, but if a team could find a big man who was dominant, it would be a huge game changer. It's a market inefficiency, if you will.

I don't think so. It's hard to find a guy who can put up much better numbers than Anthony Davis has. Hasn't helped his team a whole lot. You need great guard play to compete today.


Anthony Davis is not a skilled big man. He has no post game.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55804
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
So you think Draymond could check the big men from that era as well as Rodman, Hakeem? No way in the world

Payton, Jordan, and Pippen could do just fine playing D in todays league.

Doing just fine and being a top 2 defensive player two years in a row is not the same thing. So hakeem would've been better at guarding centers? Ok. Draymond would be better at guarding every other position on the floor.

All 5 of those guys could be DPOY in todays league. It is silly to think otherwise.

They could be. Who knows? Draymond Green is.

And he wouldnt be in their era.

They could be in his era, he couldn't be in their era.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Maybe, but if a team could find a big man who was dominant, it would be a huge game changer. It's a market inefficiency, if you will.

I don't think so. It's hard to find a guy who can put up much better numbers than Anthony Davis has. Hasn't helped his team a whole lot. You need great guard play to compete today.


Anthony Davis is not a skilled big man. He has no post game.

That's ridiculous. Of course he does.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
leashyourkids wrote:
long time guy wrote:
It's almost laughable how unskilled a number of modern day "elite" centers are. Watching Jazz Warriors. Gobert can't score unless it's an alley oop play.


Yep. Alonzo Mourning would be the best big man in the game both ways today. #sad!


Yep.

He benefits from guarding non offensive centers and PFs. If he truly "shut down" LeBron then why was Lebron's the primary assignment of Iggy?

For all the talk about the game being better it isn't and I'm a big fan. Guys like James Edwards would absolutely murder Draymond Green and he was never elite. The game has made the mid range shot public enemy No. 1 which effects Centers too. I'm sure many don't practice that shot. It's dumb.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
RFDC wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
So you think Draymond could check the big men from that era as well as Rodman, Hakeem? No way in the world

Payton, Jordan, and Pippen could do just fine playing D in todays league.

Doing just fine and being a top 2 defensive player two years in a row is not the same thing. So hakeem would've been better at guarding centers? Ok. Draymond would be better at guarding every other position on the floor.

All 5 of those guys could be DPOY in todays league. It is silly to think otherwise.

They could be. Who knows? Draymond Green is.

And he wouldnt be in their era.

They could be in his era, he couldn't be in their era.

There's no way to know that and all evidence suggests you are wrong.


I find it very amusing that the old guys on this board think it's crazy to suggest one of the best defensive players in the NBA today would be one of the best defensive players in the NBA 20 years ago.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
long time guy wrote:
It's almost laughable how unskilled a number of modern day "elite" centers are. Watching Jazz Warriors. Gobert can't score unless it's an alley oop play.


Yep. Alonzo Mourning would be the best big man in the game both ways today. #sad!


Yep.

He benefits from guarding non offensive centers and PFs. If he truly "shut down" LeBron then why was Lebron's the primary assignment of Iggy?

For all the talk about the game being better it isn't and I'm a big fan. Guys like James Edwards would absolutely murder Draymond Green and he was never elite. The game has made the mid range shot public enemy No. 1 which effects Centers too. I'm sure many don't practice that shot. It's dumb.

:lol:

Every part of this post is bullshit. It is funny though.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Maybe, but if a team could find a big man who was dominant, it would be a huge game changer. It's a market inefficiency, if you will.

I don't think so. It's hard to find a guy who can put up much better numbers than Anthony Davis has. Hasn't helped his team a whole lot. You need great guard play to compete today.


Anthony Davis is not a skilled big man. He has no post game.

That's ridiculous. Of course he does.


Doesn't Anthony Davis put up big numbers whenever he plays G.S?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Maybe, but if a team could find a big man who was dominant, it would be a huge game changer. It's a market inefficiency, if you will.

I don't think so. It's hard to find a guy who can put up much better numbers than Anthony Davis has. Hasn't helped his team a whole lot. You need great guard play to compete today.


Anthony Davis is not a skilled big man. He has no post game.

That's ridiculous. Of course he does.


Doesn't Anthony Davis put up big numbers whenever he plays G.S?

He puts up big numbers against almost every team. He's a superstar player.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
long time guy wrote:
It's almost laughable how unskilled a number of modern day "elite" centers are. Watching Jazz Warriors. Gobert can't score unless it's an alley oop play.


Yep. Alonzo Mourning would be the best big man in the game both ways today. #sad!


Yep.

He benefits from guarding non offensive centers and PFs. If he truly "shut down" LeBron then why was Lebron's the primary assignment of Iggy?

For all the talk about the game being better it isn't and I'm a big fan. Guys like James Edwards would absolutely murder Draymond Green and he was never elite. The game has made the mid range shot public enemy No. 1 which effects Centers too. I'm sure many don't practice that shot. It's dumb.

:lol:

Every part of this post is bullshit. It is funny though.



If he shut down James then how dId G.S. lose last season? Cleveland popped G.S. based on the performance of 2 players and James was one of them

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
long time guy wrote:
It's almost laughable how unskilled a number of modern day "elite" centers are. Watching Jazz Warriors. Gobert can't score unless it's an alley oop play.


Yep. Alonzo Mourning would be the best big man in the game both ways today. #sad!


Yep.

He benefits from guarding non offensive centers and PFs. If he truly "shut down" LeBron then why was Lebron's the primary assignment of Iggy?

For all the talk about the game being better it isn't and I'm a big fan. Guys like James Edwards would absolutely murder Draymond Green and he was never elite. The game has made the mid range shot public enemy No. 1 which effects Centers too. I'm sure many don't practice that shot. It's dumb.

:lol:

Every part of this post is bullshit. It is funny though.



If he shut down James then how dId G.S. lose last season? Cleveland popped G.S. based on the performance of 2 players and James was one of them

The series swung when he got suspended for Game 6. He did everything he could on both ends in Game 7 but it wasn't enough.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Maybe, but if a team could find a big man who was dominant, it would be a huge game changer. It's a market inefficiency, if you will.

I don't think so. It's hard to find a guy who can put up much better numbers than Anthony Davis has. Hasn't helped his team a whole lot. You need great guard play to compete today.


Anthony Davis is not a skilled big man. He has no post game.

That's ridiculous. Of course he does.


Doesn't Anthony Davis put up big numbers whenever he plays G.S?

He puts up big numbers against almost every team. He's a superstar player.


Shouldn't an elite player be able to prevent that or is his stellar defensive work relegated to guarding guys like Meyers Leonard?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Sun May 07, 2017 5:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55804
:lol: It is funny to me that MANY of us get criticized for being the old guys ...blah blah blah.

Yet FF's defense in many of these discussions is to make it seem like we do not watch the NBA, because clearly if we watched the NBA we would agree with him.

That is what is bullshit.

You ride with Draymond.

I will ride with Payton, Hakeem, Rodman, Pippen, and Jordan.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
So you think Draymond could check the big men from that era as well as Rodman, Hakeem? No way in the world

Payton, Jordan, and Pippen could do just fine playing D in todays league.

Doing just fine and being a top 2 defensive player two years in a row is not the same thing. So hakeem would've been better at guarding centers? Ok. Draymond would be better at guarding every other position on the floor.

All 5 of those guys could be DPOY in todays league. It is silly to think otherwise.

They could be. Who knows? Draymond Green is.

And he wouldnt be in their era.

They could be in his era, he couldn't be in their era.

There's no way to know that and all evidence suggests you are wrong.


I find it very amusing that the old guys on this board think it's crazy to suggest one of the best defensive players in the NBA today would be one of the best defensive players in the NBA 20 years ago.


I'm your age.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
RFDC wrote:
:lol: It is funny to me that MANY of us get criticized for being the old guys ...blah blah blah.

Yet FF's defense in many of these discussions is to make it seem like we do not watch the NBA, because clearly if we watched the NBA we would agree with him.

That is what is bullshit.

You ride with Draymond.

I will ride with Payton, Hakeem, Rodman, Pippen, and Jordan.


Also, this isn't an "old guy" argument. In some sports, it is... but in basketball, the rules and style have quantifiably changed, and I don't think a lot of today's players could adapt to the way it used to be played.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 6:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
RFDC wrote:
:lol: It is funny to me that MANY of us get criticized for being the old guys ...blah blah blah.

Yet FF's defense in many of these discussions is to make it seem like we do not watch the NBA, because clearly if we watched the NBA we would agree with him.

That is what is bullshit.

You ride with Draymond.

I will ride with Payton, Hakeem, Rodman, Pippen, and Jordan.

I never said anything about watching games in this thread. But when guys act like Draymond Green isn't a great defensive player then they themselves make it seem like they aren't watching.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 6:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
RFDC wrote:
:lol: It is funny to me that MANY of us get criticized for being the old guys ...blah blah blah.

Yet FF's defense in many of these discussions is to make it seem like we do not watch the NBA, because clearly if we watched the NBA we would agree with him.

That is what is bullshit.

You ride with Draymond.

I will ride with Payton, Hakeem, Rodman, Pippen, and Jordan.


Also, this isn't an "old guy" argument. In some sports, it is... but in basketball, the rules and style have quantifiably changed, and I don't think a lot of today's players could adapt to the way it used to be played.

Based on what?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 6:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
long time guy wrote:
It's almost laughable how unskilled a number of modern day "elite" centers are. Watching Jazz Warriors. Gobert can't score unless it's an alley oop play.


Yep. Alonzo Mourning would be the best big man in the game both ways today. #sad!


Yep.

He benefits from guarding non offensive centers and PFs. If he truly "shut down" LeBron then why was Lebron's the primary assignment of Iggy?

For all the talk about the game being better it isn't and I'm a big fan. Guys like James Edwards would absolutely murder Draymond Green and he was never elite. The game has made the mid range shot public enemy No. 1 which effects Centers too. I'm sure many don't practice that shot. It's dumb.

:lol:

Every part of this post is bullshit. It is funny though.



If he shut down James then how dId G.S. lose last season? Cleveland popped G.S. based on the performance of 2 players and James was one of them

The series swung when he got suspended for Game 6. He did everything he could on both ends in Game 7 but it wasn't enough.



He only guarded Lebron James when he switched on screen roll. If he were that guy he would have done what other elite guys do which is take the cover. He is guarding guys that never get plays called for them like Tristan Thompson and you are lauding his defensive work.

The guys Walt named always guarded who they were supposed to guard. Hakeem took the Robinson Ewing and Shaq cover. They always guarded their opposite number. Green is guarding non offensive players and helping on rotations.

If he were the all time great defender you keep proclaiming him to be then his assignment would be to shut James down and dare the other guys to beat them.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
RFDC wrote:
:lol: It is funny to me that MANY of us get criticized for being the old guys ...blah blah blah.

Yet FF's defense in many of these discussions is to make it seem like we do not watch the NBA, because clearly if we watched the NBA we would agree with him.

That is what is bullshit.

You ride with Draymond.

I will ride with Payton, Hakeem, Rodman, Pippen, and Jordan.


Also, this isn't an "old guy" argument. In some sports, it is... but in basketball, the rules and style have quantifiably changed, and I don't think a lot of today's players could adapt to the way it used to be played.

Based on what?


My eyes?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
RFDC wrote:
:lol: It is funny to me that MANY of us get criticized for being the old guys ...blah blah blah.

Yet FF's defense in many of these discussions is to make it seem like we do not watch the NBA, because clearly if we watched the NBA we would agree with him.

That is what is bullshit.

You ride with Draymond.

I will ride with Payton, Hakeem, Rodman, Pippen, and Jordan.


Also, this isn't an "old guy" argument. In some sports, it is... but in basketball, the rules and style have quantifiably changed, and I don't think a lot of today's players could adapt to the way it used to be played.

Based on what?


My eyes?

:lol:

Ok. I don't know how you can make that statement based on what you see on the court. Of course the players today could adjust. Just like I'm sure the great players in the 90's could adjust to today's game. The styles are different. The players aren't fundamentally worse.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 6:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
When Shaq was in Orlando, it appeared they had a recipe that was unguardable. They had Shaq surrounded by great shooters and guys who were great entry passers. Dennis Scott never missed. Teams had a choice - let Shaq kill your center or double and let them shoot an effective FG% of over 60% from three.

Then they played the Bulls in '96 and got laughed out of the series. Rodman had Shaq wanting to punch out his own teammates, and Jordan, Pippen, and Harper were rotstion machines. I think they won the first game by like 50 points.

They would do similar things to GS.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 6:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
RFDC wrote:
:lol: It is funny to me that MANY of us get criticized for being the old guys ...blah blah blah.

Yet FF's defense in many of these discussions is to make it seem like we do not watch the NBA, because clearly if we watched the NBA we would agree with him.

That is what is bullshit.

You ride with Draymond.

I will ride with Payton, Hakeem, Rodman, Pippen, and Jordan.


Also, this isn't an "old guy" argument. In some sports, it is... but in basketball, the rules and style have quantifiably changed, and I don't think a lot of today's players could adapt to the way it used to be played.

Based on what?


My eyes?

:lol:

Ok. I don't know how you can make that statement based on what you see on the court. Of course the players today could adjust. Just like I'm sure the great players in the 90's could adjust to today's game. The styles are different. The players aren't fundamentally worse.


The 4s and 5s absolutely are fundamentally worse.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
The 4s and 5s absolutely are fundamentally worse.

No they aren't. They aren't as good at posting up. They are better at shooting and passing the ball. As I said, it's a different game.

But we are just talking generalities here. A great player like Draymond would be able to adjust easily, especially considering he's already one of the most versatile players in a much more versatile era.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 6:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
leashyourkids wrote:
When Shaq was in Orlando, it appeared they had a recipe that was unguardable. They had Shaq surrounded by great shooters and guys who were great entry passers. Dennis Scott never missed. Teams had a choice - let Shaq kill your center or double and let them shoot an effective FG% of over 60% from three.

Then they played the Bulls in '96 and got laughed out of the series. Rodman had Shaq wanting to punch out his own teammates, and Jordan, Pippen, and Harper were rotstion machines. I think they won the first game by like 50 points.

They would do similar things to GS.


Yep what separated those guys were that all 4 were great individual defenders.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 6:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55804
leashyourkids wrote:
When Shaq was in Orlando, it appeared they had a recipe that was unguardable. They had Shaq surrounded by great shooters and guys who were great entry passers. Dennis Scott never missed. Teams had a choice - let Shaq kill your center or double and let them shoot an effective FG% of over 60% from three.

Then they played the Bulls in '96 and got laughed out of the series. Rodman had Shaq wanting to punch out his own teammates, and Jordan, Pippen, and Harper were rotstion machines. I think they won the first game by like 50 points.

They would do similar things to GS.

Yup.

Image

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 6:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
When Shaq was in Orlando, it appeared they had a recipe that was unguardable. They had Shaq surrounded by great shooters and guys who were great entry passers. Dennis Scott never missed. Teams had a choice - let Shaq kill your center or double and let them shoot an effective FG% of over 60% from three.

Then they played the Bulls in '96 and got laughed out of the series. Rodman had Shaq wanting to punch out his own teammates, and Jordan, Pippen, and Harper were rotstion machines. I think they won the first game by like 50 points.

They would do similar things to GS.

No they wouldn't and the one thing you're forgetting here is that Orlando team sucked defensively, the Warriors are a great defensive team. Not to mention Steph Curry is the EXACT player that used to give those Bulls teams trouble. I would take the Bulls of course but it wouldn't be a rout and Draymond would absolutely be an effective player in that series.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 6:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
RFDC wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
When Shaq was in Orlando, it appeared they had a recipe that was unguardable. They had Shaq surrounded by great shooters and guys who were great entry passers. Dennis Scott never missed. Teams had a choice - let Shaq kill your center or double and let them shoot an effective FG% of over 60% from three.

Then they played the Bulls in '96 and got laughed out of the series. Rodman had Shaq wanting to punch out his own teammates, and Jordan, Pippen, and Harper were rotstion machines. I think they won the first game by like 50 points.

They would do similar things to GS.

Yup.

Image

:lol:

Not sure if Old Guy Bias or Bulls Fan Bias

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 6:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55804
FavreFan wrote:
Draymond would absolutely be an effective player in that series.


Nah. He would probably end up ejected or dead

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 169 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group