It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 7:20 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1260 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 42  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 3:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 31472
pizza_Place: Milano's
Quote:
Now we are down to touting assist to turnovers ratio


yea what a ridiculous thing to grade a PG on


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Bagels wrote:
Quote:
Now we are down to touting assist to turnovers ratio


yea what a ridiculous thing to grade a PG on

:lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Bagels wrote:
Quote:
Now we are down to touting assist to turnovers ratio


yea what a ridiculous thing to grade a PG on


I would never say that a guy was playing great solely based on that. My point is that the narrative changes to fit the situation. +/- wasn't serious then it was.

When it is all said and done he is playing about how I expected him to play. The bar has been lowered for the kid throughout the NBA in a span of 2 weeks. He went from a can't miss transcendant player to a guy that will merely be a good piece on a winning team at best. That is what I am inferring from this. I'm hard pressed to find anyone associated with the NBA that considers him a budding All Star. Power rankings for rookies had him 7th last week and I expect it to be lower this week. He has had one game that you con consider outstanding and one that was so so. The other 8 have been duds and the analysis consisted of people attempting to tell you how great he is playing. Even his 0 point effort was spun by the people on here. Its difficult to have "credibility" on the issue when you're constantly exercising confirmation bias tactics in order to validate arguments.

When it comes down to it he doesn't pass the sniff test. He may in the future but he definitely doesn't now. He blows and I don't expect him to play much better in the future. He will be better but that is only because he really can't play any worse.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Talk about rather putrid numbers.




https://www.basketball-reference.com/pl ... llo01.html

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 7:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Still trying to fathom how a guy with 88 points on 117 attempts is still considered to be playing "great.

Avg 1 free throw attempt per game yet he is constantly "breaking people down with the dribble"


Actually this guy has better numbers in comparison and I haven't read one positive comment about him since he has been in the league.

https://www.basketball-reference.com/pl ... tje02.html


https://www.basketball-reference.com/pl ... llo01.html



A most apropo comparison indeed!

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 7:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 39749
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
long time guy wrote:
Still trying to fathom how a guy with 88 points on 117 attempts is still considered to be playing "great.

Avg 1 free throw attempt per game yet he is constantly "breaking people down with the dribble"


Actually this guy has better numbers in comparison and I haven't read one positive comment about him since he has been in the league.

https://www.basketball-reference.com/pl ... tje02.html


https://www.basketball-reference.com/pl ... llo01.html



A most apropo comparison indeed!



It is funny to see Ball is not far superior to Grant.

_________________
Brick wrote:
Biden is doing a GOOD job.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 7:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
long time guy wrote:
Still trying to fathom how a guy with 88 points on 117 attempts is still considered to be playing "great.

Avg 1 free throw attempt per game yet he is constantly "breaking people down with the dribble"


Actually this guy has better numbers in comparison and I haven't read one positive comment about him since he has been in the league.

https://www.basketball-reference.com/pl ... tje02.html


https://www.basketball-reference.com/pl ... llo01.html



A most apropo comparison indeed!




Strong comp

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 15977
pizza_Place: Salerno's
liangelo ball arrested for retail theft in Chiner, locked up abroad?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
All the family money went into a failure of a shoe company. Tough to see a family fall on such hard times.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68609
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Hussra wrote:
liangelo ball arrested for retail theft in Chiner, locked up abroad?


Probably chop off his hand.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 31472
pizza_Place: Milano's
Caning


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16371
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Lonzo played well last night despite the usual bad shooting. Actually starting to get a little encouraged with the FG% as last night he continued to get to the rim at will, but didn't finish on at least 3 wide open bunnies. That's all confidence or lack of and will definitely improve once he starts to get more comfortable. He was 4/15...if he starts to make his easy layups his % will go up dramatically.

Other than the bad shooting, he played about as good of defense as one can play against Kyrie Irving. Definitely got burned for a couple layups, but also blocked his shot at least once and had one nice play where he followed up a Kyrie layup by grabbing the ball and going coast to coast for his own bucket. Also Kyrie shot 7/21 from the field.

Lonzo stuffed the stat sheet otherwise....5 boards, 6 assists, 2 TOs, 1 steal and 4 blocks.

I think in his last 5 games he has 29 assists and 4 turnovers. Pretty amazing for a rookie PG.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 3:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Stephen A is saying Lonzo is starting to look like a bust and shakes thinks he is the greatest rookie PG ever. I think the truth is somewhere in the middle.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 3:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
IMU wrote:
Stephen A is saying Lonzo is starting to look like a bust and shakes thinks he is the greatest rookie PG ever. I think the truth is somewhere in the middle.


As it stands now his shooting percentage is the worst of any rookie since 1951.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Lonzo's career in basketball appears to be eerily similar to Roy Halladay's career as a pilot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 31472
pizza_Place: Milano's
i'm trying to stay positive but shakes saying he's "stuffing the stat sheet" is a bit of a stretch....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Bagels wrote:
i'm trying to stay positive but shakes saying he's "stuffing the stat sheet" is a bit of a stretch....


Sort of hard to do when you're not avg anywhere near double figures in any one category. This is getting bad.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 4:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
long time guy wrote:
IMU wrote:
Stephen A is saying Lonzo is starting to look like a bust and shakes thinks he is the greatest rookie PG ever. I think the truth is somewhere in the middle.


As it stands now his shooting percentage is the worst of any rookie since 1951.



Yikes

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16371
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Bagels wrote:
i'm trying to stay positive but shakes saying he's "stuffing the stat sheet" is a bit of a stretch....


I hear ya, but aside from shooting, what area of the game is he not doing well?

All I hear is shooting %, shooting %, shooting form etc, but no one wants to talk about the great things he is doing as a 20 year old rookie starting PG in the areas of assist, turnovers, pace, rebounding and even defense.


I like what I heard from Antonio Daniels today on NBA radio. he said, like I have from day one, its going to take a long time for him to get adjusted but he will get adjusted. The shot didn't worry AD at all, said it will come around eventually once he gets more comfortable around the league. People are all over him, but from day 1 I've been saying it will take 2-3 years for him to become a great player. I don't think that's an unreasonable position to have.


Big picture: he's the most hyped rook since Lebron and is actually under more pressure as rook than Lebron ever faced. He's played 11 games in his career, just turned 20 a week ago. He has shown elite vision, great rebounding, solid defense and the ability to take care of the ball. He's also been terrible shooting the ball. Nothing in that picture says here's a guy who can't be a great player.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 5:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Lonzo Ball:
29.5% FG, 23.1% 3P, 53.8% FT, 6.8 Rebounds, 7.3 Assists, 1.2 Steals, 1.0 Blocks, 2.5 Turnovers, 9.5 Points

Stats from a recent rookie PG considered to have a bust of a freshman season:
37.7% FG, 28.8% 3P, 61.0% FT, 4.5 Rebounds, 5.1 Assists, 2.1 Steals, 1.0 Blocks, 2.4 Turnovers, 7.9 Points

Who cares about who had what hype? The fact is that Lonzo Ball hasn't been impressing, even when you consider his rookie status. He has been okay at best. Maybe he will turn out pretty good. But right now he isn't exactly lighting it up.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
IMU wrote:
Lonzo Ball:
29.5% FG, 23.1% 3P, 53.8% FT, 6.8 Rebounds, 7.3 Assists, 1.2 Steals, 1.0 Blocks, 2.5 Turnovers, 9.5 Points

Stats from a recent rookie PG considered to have a bust of a freshman season:
37.7% FG, 28.8% 3P, 61.0% FT, 4.5 Rebounds, 5.1 Assists, 2.1 Steals, 1.0 Blocks, 2.4 Turnovers, 7.9 Points

Who cares about who had what hype? The fact is that Lonzo Ball hasn't been impressing, even when you consider his rookie status. He has been okay at best. Maybe he will turn out pretty good. But right now he isn't exactly lighting it up.


If his career were to end with his numbers remaining the way they are currently he'd be considered a bust. His numbers are worse than Jerian Grant currently.

Even if you excuse the hype the fact that he is a #2 pick makes him a bust. Factor in guys that followed him in the draft and it becomes obvious that this was a terrible pick.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 5:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
long time guy wrote:
IMU wrote:
Lonzo Ball:
29.5% FG, 23.1% 3P, 53.8% FT, 6.8 Rebounds, 7.3 Assists, 1.2 Steals, 1.0 Blocks, 2.5 Turnovers, 9.5 Points

Stats from a recent rookie PG considered to have a bust of a freshman season:
37.7% FG, 28.8% 3P, 61.0% FT, 4.5 Rebounds, 5.1 Assists, 2.1 Steals, 1.0 Blocks, 2.4 Turnovers, 7.9 Points

Who cares about who had what hype? The fact is that Lonzo Ball hasn't been impressing, even when you consider his rookie status. He has been okay at best. Maybe he will turn out pretty good. But right now he isn't exactly lighting it up.


If his career were to end with his numbers remaining the way they are currently he'd be considered a bust. His numbers are worse than Jerian Grant currently.

Even if you excuse the hype the fact that he is a #2 pick makes him a bust. Factor in guys that followed him in the draft and it becomes obvious that this was a terrible pick.

You can't waltz in here trying to piggy back on stats hinting that Lonzo Ball isn't playing well while trying to ignore stats that show Oklahoma City plays poorly when Carmelo is on the court. GTFO of here.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 5:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
IMU wrote:
Lonzo Ball:
29.5% FG, 23.1% 3P, 53.8% FT, 6.8 Rebounds, 7.3 Assists, 1.2 Steals, 1.0 Blocks, 2.5 Turnovers, 9.5 Points

Stats from a recent rookie PG considered to have a bust of a freshman season:
37.7% FG, 28.8% 3P, 61.0% FT, 4.5 Rebounds, 5.1 Assists, 2.1 Steals, 1.0 Blocks, 2.4 Turnovers, 7.9 Points

Who cares about who had what hype? The fact is that Lonzo Ball hasn't been impressing, even when you consider his rookie status. He has been okay at best. Maybe he will turn out pretty good. But right now he isn't exactly lighting it up.


If his career were to end with his numbers remaining the way they are currently he'd be considered a bust. His numbers are worse than Jerian Grant currently.

Even if you excuse the hype the fact that he is a #2 pick makes him a bust. Factor in guys that followed him in the draft and it becomes obvious that this was a terrible pick.

You can't waltz in here trying to piggy back on stats hinting that Lonzo Ball isn't playing well while trying to ignore stats that show Oklahoma City plays poorly when Carmelo is on the court. GTFO of here.


Apparently you didn't notice the phrase "exclusively on stats" Stats should be supplemental. All you ever do is quote stats.

I've already attempted to analyze Ball's game. I didn't think he was shit but that was based on what I'd seen of him as a player. Stats can't be the be all end all.

Let me give you an example. The stats suggested that Isaiah Thomas and Kyrie Irving were essentially the same player.
They weren't and I never thought they were. Now the world can see for themselves that they never were the same player.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 5:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 15977
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Trade him to San Antonio, they'll fix his shot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
long time guy wrote:
Let me give you an example. The stats suggested that Isaiah Thomas and Kyrie Irving were essentially the same player.
They weren't and I never thought they were. Now the world can see for themselves that they never were the same player.

wut

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Let me give you an example. The stats suggested that Isaiah Thomas and Kyrie Irving were essentially the same player.
They weren't and I never thought they were. Now the world can see for themselves that they never were the same player.

wut


Before this season started people used statistical analysis which suggested that Irving and Thomas were the same player. Some even used it to suggest that Thomas was better. He isn't.

Carmelo Anthony hasn't been a problem for OKC. You haven't seen them play and you're looking for anything that verifies your bias.

A 31% Usage rate is also high considering the fact that George and Anthony are on the team too.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Let me give you an example. The stats suggested that Isaiah Thomas and Kyrie Irving were essentially the same player.
They weren't and I never thought they were. Now the world can see for themselves that they never were the same player.

wut


Before this season started people used statistical analysis which suggested that Irving and Thomas were the same player. Some even used it to suggest that Thomas was better. He isn't.

Carmelo Anthony hasn't been a problem for OKC. You haven't seen them play and you're looking for anything that verifies your bias.

A 31% Usage rate is also high considering the fact that George and Anthony are on the team too.

Yes he has.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 7:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Let me give you an example. The stats suggested that Isaiah Thomas and Kyrie Irving were essentially the same player.
They weren't and I never thought they were. Now the world can see for themselves that they never were the same player.

wut


Before this season started people used statistical analysis which suggested that Irving and Thomas were the same player. Some even used it to suggest that Thomas was better. He isn't.

Carmelo Anthony hasn't been a problem for OKC. You haven't seen them play and you're looking for anything that verifies your bias.

A 31% Usage rate is also high considering the fact that George and Anthony are on the team too.

Yes he has.


How?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 7:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Let me give you an example. The stats suggested that Isaiah Thomas and Kyrie Irving were essentially the same player.
They weren't and I never thought they were. Now the world can see for themselves that they never were the same player.

wut


Before this season started people used statistical analysis which suggested that Irving and Thomas were the same player. Some even used it to suggest that Thomas was better. He isn't.

Carmelo Anthony hasn't been a problem for OKC. You haven't seen them play and you're looking for anything that verifies your bias.

A 31% Usage rate is also high considering the fact that George and Anthony are on the team too.

Yes he has.


How?

He hasn't played well and that's hurting them. It's one of the reasons they are 4-6.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lonzo: Year 1
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 7:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Let me give you an example. The stats suggested that Isaiah Thomas and Kyrie Irving were essentially the same player.
They weren't and I never thought they were. Now the world can see for themselves that they never were the same player.

wut


Before this season started people used statistical analysis which suggested that Irving and Thomas were the same player. Some even used it to suggest that Thomas was better. He isn't.

Carmelo Anthony hasn't been a problem for OKC. You haven't seen them play and you're looking for anything that verifies your bias.

A 31% Usage rate is also high considering the fact that George and Anthony are on the team too.

Yes he has.


How?

He hasn't played well and that's hurting them. It's one of the reasons they are 4-6.


He has played well overall.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1260 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 42  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group