Whatever category Barkley, Iverson, and Paul are in, he's in that category.

No. He is not in that category; he is in a category below those 3 guys.

No. He is not in that category; he is in a category below those 3 guys.

Maybe Iverson but not Barkley or Paul

Russel is clearly an example of effort making the difference. He never had any special talents. Accurate passer, that helps, but other than that he didnt do anything special. Could run too, but his accuracy was why he was good

Westbrook Great Competitor. Not A Great Player. If he were then he'd still be able to play at a high level right now.

Bosh and Love struggled in a similar role. It's still early. That being said I wasn't a fan of his game in recent years.

I'm divided on this one.

Westbrook struggled last year and in Houston as well. I am a fan of his as a competitor but that doesn't mean he is a great player.

I think it's always been tough for me to separate Westbrook the player from Westbrook the competitor . Often times it clouded my judgment of him.

Can’t he be both?

I was a huge fan of Westbrook's. Over the past few years I've recognized that he's nothing more than a high motor stat padder. Hood and I argued about this near the end of last season.

I was a huge fan of Westbrook's. Over the past few years I've recognized that he's nothing more than a high motor stat padder. Hood and I argued about this near the end of last season.