It is currently Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:32 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 131 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 88937
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
Football became a ratings hog because of gambling...plain and simple.


Perhaps... but that doesn't make it any less popular. If it weren't for gambling, sports like horse racing wouldn't even exist.
If only you could gamble on baseball maybe it would be more popular. Baseball should start having fantasy leagues.


Fantasy leagues were invented in baseball. They were too complex for football fans.
So people were gambling on baseball before football?

Also what do you think about the fact that nfl stadiums are filled at much higher capacities and by capacity percentage?

I'd say filling stadiums like that makes a good case they are more popular. Lots of empty seats in baseball.



There are only eight NFL games per season.
Why does that matter?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:02 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76967
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Why does that matter?


What do you think attendance would look like if the White Sox only played 8 home games per season?

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54230
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Why does that matter?


What do you think attendance would look like if the White Sox only played 8 home games per season?

Would the eight games be in April? Probably about the same.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 88937
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Why does that matter?


What do you think attendance would look like if the White Sox only played 8 home games per season?

That isn't an answer. Why does it matter that there are 8 home games a year in football and 81 in baseball in terms of comparing average attendance and capacity filled?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Why does that matter?


What do you think attendance would look like if the White Sox only played 8 home games per season?

That isn't an answer. Why does it matter that there are 8 home games a year in football and 81 in baseball in terms of comparing average attendance and capacity filled?

You can't have asked that seriously.

Supply and demand mean anything to you?

If the White Sox only had 480,000 seats to fill every season they'd do it easily.

If the Bears had to fill 3,483,000 seats every season? Not even fucking close.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
Football became a ratings hog because of gambling...plain and simple.


Perhaps... but that doesn't make it any less popular. If it weren't for gambling, sports like horse racing wouldn't even exist.


That's not true either. I would think a guy from Central Illinois would know that almost every county has a fair with non-betting races.


The point is that horse racing popularity relies heavily on gambling. Does that make it any less popular to you?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
It relies all on gambling. :lol:

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
IMU wrote:
It relies all on gambling. :lol:


I agree, but it's semantics.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17588
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
Gambling on football is just easier than baseball...

-the layperson can easily keep track of games and scores.

-fewer games

-games played once a week

-winter sport is easier to follow with fewer outdoor activities and less daylight.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11486
pizza_Place: Dino's
I'm a Cub fan on account of television.

I'm a Raider fan on account of television.

I don't gamble.

You people are idiots.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 11:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Lead story on ESPN right now is that Penn State beat Ohio State.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 11:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
Lead story on ESPN right now is that Penn State beat Ohio State.

:lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 1:17 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76967
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
leashyourkids wrote:
Lead story on ESPN right now is that Penn State beat Ohio State.


The Cubs are irrelevant.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 6:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 88937
Location: To the left of my post
IMU wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Why does that matter?


What do you think attendance would look like if the White Sox only played 8 home games per season?

That isn't an answer. Why does it matter that there are 8 home games a year in football and 81 in baseball in terms of comparing average attendance and capacity filled?

You can't have asked that seriously.

Supply and demand mean anything to you?

If the White Sox only had 480,000 seats to fill every season they'd do it easily.

If the Bears had to fill 3,483,000 seats every season? Not even fucking close.
I prefer JORR answer. There is a big reason he won't though and he has Seacrested the answer multiple times.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Last edited by Brick on Sun Oct 23, 2016 6:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 6:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 88937
Location: To the left of my post
GoldenJet wrote:
Gambling on football is just easier than baseball...

-the layperson can easily keep track of games and scores.

-fewer games

-games played once a week

-winter sport is easier to follow with fewer outdoor activities and less daylight.

Score another positive for football! Thank you for the help.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:06 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76967
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
IMU wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Why does that matter?


What do you think attendance would look like if the White Sox only played 8 home games per season?

That isn't an answer. Why does it matter that there are 8 home games a year in football and 81 in baseball in terms of comparing average attendance and capacity filled?

You can't have asked that seriously.

Supply and demand mean anything to you?

If the White Sox only had 480,000 seats to fill every season they'd do it easily.

If the Bears had to fill 3,483,000 seats every season? Not even fucking close.
I prefer JORR answer. There is a big reason he won't though and he has Seacrested the answer multiple times.



Actually, I didn't answer because the answer is obvious and you're just trying to BRick the argument. But IMU spelled out what you clearly already knew.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 88937
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
IMU wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Why does that matter?


What do you think attendance would look like if the White Sox only played 8 home games per season?

That isn't an answer. Why does it matter that there are 8 home games a year in football and 81 in baseball in terms of comparing average attendance and capacity filled?

You can't have asked that seriously.

Supply and demand mean anything to you?

If the White Sox only had 480,000 seats to fill every season they'd do it easily.

If the Bears had to fill 3,483,000 seats every season? Not even fucking close.
I prefer JORR answer. There is a big reason he won't though and he has Seacrested the answer multiple times.



Actually, I didn't answer because the answer is obvious and you're just trying to BRick the argument. But IMU spelled out what you clearly already knew.
See.

So why is total tickets sold an acceptable metric? You cite that as your number one reason why baseball is more popular. The exact same logic applies.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:35 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76967
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
See.

So why is total tickets sold an acceptable metric? You cite that as your number one reason why baseball is more popular. The exact same logic applies.


I've never cited that as the number one reason. It's just one piece of evidence. People are breaking down weeping because the fucking Cubs are going to the World Series. This is supposed to be a "Bears Town", but I don't remember anyone crying when the Bears won the NFC championship in '06. The emotions when it comes to baseball are just so much deeper and it's obvious. It's the American game, a thread running through most of our history. The modern NFL that started maybe some time in the late 60s/early 70s just can't match that regardless of how many people turn their TVs to it on fall Sundays.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 88937
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
See.

So why is total tickets sold an acceptable metric? You cite that as your number one reason why baseball is more popular. The exact same logic applies.


I've never cited that as the number one reason. It's just one piece of evidence. People are breaking down weeping because the fucking Cubs are going to the World Series. This is supposed to be a "Bears Town", but I don't remember anyone crying when the Bears won the NFC championship in '06. The emotions when it comes to baseball are just so much deeper and it's obvious. It's the American game, a thread running through most of our history. The modern NFL that started maybe some time in the late 60s/early 70s just can't match that regardless of how many people turn their TVs to it on fall Sundays.

So you agree total tickets sold is a very bad metric?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
See.

So why is total tickets sold an acceptable metric? You cite that as your number one reason why baseball is more popular. The exact same logic applies.


I've never cited that as the number one reason. It's just one piece of evidence. People are breaking down weeping because the fucking Cubs are going to the World Series. This is supposed to be a "Bears Town", but I don't remember anyone crying when the Bears won the NFC championship in '06. The emotions when it comes to baseball are just so much deeper and it's obvious. It's the American game, a thread running through most of our history. The modern NFL that started maybe some time in the late 60s/early 70s just can't match that regardless of how many people turn their TVs to it on fall Sundays.


These are all just your own projections. There are people that care deeply about other sports. You seem to think that just because you don't, no one else does.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:51 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76967
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
See.

So why is total tickets sold an acceptable metric? You cite that as your number one reason why baseball is more popular. The exact same logic applies.


I've never cited that as the number one reason. It's just one piece of evidence. People are breaking down weeping because the fucking Cubs are going to the World Series. This is supposed to be a "Bears Town", but I don't remember anyone crying when the Bears won the NFC championship in '06. The emotions when it comes to baseball are just so much deeper and it's obvious. It's the American game, a thread running through most of our history. The modern NFL that started maybe some time in the late 60s/early 70s just can't match that regardless of how many people turn their TVs to it on fall Sundays.


These are all just your own projections. There are people that care deeply about other sports. You seem to think that just because you don't, no one else does.


No, I'm reading your posts. And those of many other big football fans and you're highly emotional about the Cubs in a way I've never seen any of you be when it comes to football.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
See.

So why is total tickets sold an acceptable metric? You cite that as your number one reason why baseball is more popular. The exact same logic applies.


I've never cited that as the number one reason. It's just one piece of evidence. People are breaking down weeping because the fucking Cubs are going to the World Series. This is supposed to be a "Bears Town", but I don't remember anyone crying when the Bears won the NFC championship in '06. The emotions when it comes to baseball are just so much deeper and it's obvious. It's the American game, a thread running through most of our history. The modern NFL that started maybe some time in the late 60s/early 70s just can't match that regardless of how many people turn their TVs to it on fall Sundays.


These are all just your own projections. There are people that care deeply about other sports. You seem to think that just because you don't, no one else does.


No, I'm reading your posts. And those of many other big football fans and you're highly emotional about the Cubs in a way I've never seen any of you be when it comes to football.


I can promise you I was in '06. Plus, this is the Cubs. There's additional significance here not related to baseball. I'm personally emotional because I never thought this day would come.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:00 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76967
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
See.

So why is total tickets sold an acceptable metric? You cite that as your number one reason why baseball is more popular. The exact same logic applies.


I've never cited that as the number one reason. It's just one piece of evidence. People are breaking down weeping because the fucking Cubs are going to the World Series. This is supposed to be a "Bears Town", but I don't remember anyone crying when the Bears won the NFC championship in '06. The emotions when it comes to baseball are just so much deeper and it's obvious. It's the American game, a thread running through most of our history. The modern NFL that started maybe some time in the late 60s/early 70s just can't match that regardless of how many people turn their TVs to it on fall Sundays.


These are all just your own projections. There are people that care deeply about other sports. You seem to think that just because you don't, no one else does.


No, I'm reading your posts. And those of many other big football fans and you're highly emotional about the Cubs in a way I've never seen any of you be when it comes to football.


I can promise you I was in '06. Plus, this is the Cubs. There's additional significance here not related to baseball. I'm personally emotional because I never thought this day would come.


It is related to baseball though. The history is part of the game. It informs how people connect to it and how they feel about it. That's the same reason why fans are infuriated with Bonds and McGwire assaulting records while juiced to the gills but they couldn't care less that the guy who holds the single season rushing record (whoever the fuck that is, I think maybe Dickerson) was loaded with PEDs.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 88937
Location: To the left of my post
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
See.

So why is total tickets sold an acceptable metric? You cite that as your number one reason why baseball is more popular. The exact same logic applies.


I've never cited that as the number one reason. It's just one piece of evidence. People are breaking down weeping because the fucking Cubs are going to the World Series. This is supposed to be a "Bears Town", but I don't remember anyone crying when the Bears won the NFC championship in '06. The emotions when it comes to baseball are just so much deeper and it's obvious. It's the American game, a thread running through most of our history. The modern NFL that started maybe some time in the late 60s/early 70s just can't match that regardless of how many people turn their TVs to it on fall Sundays.

So you agree total tickets sold is a very bad metric?

Jorr, can I get a final answer on this?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17588
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
I also cried when the Blackhawks win the Cup in 2010.

The intensity of NHL and MLB playoff games, combined with a lifetime or more of frustration for very passionate fan bases just can't be met by the NFL or the NBA. Although, when the Bulls won their first, I was still playing a lot of ball and I was really into that team...That one was pretty emotional too.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:43 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76967
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
GoldenJet wrote:
I also cried when the Blackhawks win the Cup in 2010.

The intensity of NHL and MLB playoff games, combined with a lifetime or more of frustration for very passionate fan bases just can't be met by the NFL or the NBA. Although, when the Bulls won their first, I was still playing a lot of ball and I was really into that team...That one was pretty emotional too.


I'm not a hockey fan in the slightest, though of course I like the Hawks to win. But I'll say this, there is nothing in sports more intense than a sudden death game during the Stanley Cup playoffs.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 8:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
In 06, I would have identified myself as a Bears fan first and foremost. I was excited, I was full of joy but it felt nothing like last night. I kept having to talk myself down from getting TOO high. Enjoy the journey but the Indians are a great team. Still need 4 more wins before I can just let loose and breakdown completely.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 9:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54230
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I prefer JORR answer. There is a big reason he won't though and he has Seacrested the answer multiple times.



Actually, I didn't answer because the answer is obvious and you're just trying to BRick the argument. But IMU spelled out what you clearly already knew.


C(S)FMB: where posters' names beome verbs for bad-faith arguments

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 9:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 88937
Location: To the left of my post
If brick an argument means be logically consistent then I'm cool with that.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54230
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I've never cited that as the number one reason. It's just one piece of evidence. People are breaking down weeping because the fucking Cubs are going to the World Series. This is supposed to be a "Bears Town", but I don't remember anyone crying when the Bears won the NFC championship in '06. The emotions when it comes to baseball are just so much deeper and it's obvious. It's the American game, a thread running through most of our history. The modern NFL that started maybe some time in the late 60s/early 70s just can't match that regardless of how many people turn their TVs to it on fall Sundays.


There were two mitigating factors in the Bears winning the NFC in '06. First, it was in the middle of a stretch where the NFC sucked ass (2004-200...8?), so there was really no deep-seated expectation that the Bears were going to win the Super Bowl -- they were probably only going to be a sacrificial lamb for the Colts or Patriots, especially with the way the Bears petered out over the course of the year from blowing everyone out to eking out wins in spite of their offense. Also, subconsciously, I think a lot of Bears fans felt they had all they ever needed with ***1985***, DA GREA-ISS FOOPBALL TEAMMA ALL TIMES, a spectre that still haunts Chicago to this day, so even something as big and cathartic as kicking the uber-favored narrative-riding New Orleans Saints right in the dick never felt like what it actually was, which was the best Bears team in a lot of fans' lifetimes.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 131 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group