It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 8:11 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 136 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 8:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Wrong. You guys seem to be suggesting that people "evolved" in two or three generations. There still has never been anyone who threw harder than Nolan Ryan. And nobody in the majors right now throws harder than Feller. Sure, they can take some middling reliever and throw 104 on the scoreboard so goofs like you jizz in your pants but that doesn't mean the guy threw harder than Walter Johnson.

And now you want to shrink Ruth. Well then, I think Carlos Zambrano was 6'0", 220. Hell, I saw the fearsome Teddy Bruschi on Sports Center last night and he looked about 5'8", 160.
That's why I asked before how well the teams Ruth played on would do today.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 8:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38103
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Wrong. You guys seem to be suggesting that people "evolved" in two or three generations. There still has never been anyone who threw harder than Nolan Ryan. And nobody in the majors right now throws harder than Feller. Sure, they can take some middling reliever and throw 104 on the scoreboard so goofs like you jizz in your pants but that doesn't mean the guy threw harder than Walter Johnson.

And now you want to shrink Ruth. Well then, I think Carlos Zambrano was 6'0", 220. Hell, I saw the fearsome Teddy Bruschi on Sports Center last night and he looked about 5'8", 160.
That's why I asked before how well the teams Ruth played on would do today.

Or conversely , I’m sure last years Orioles team would’ve went 154-0 in 1927 with 117 no-hitters playing against those inferior junk ball throwing stiffs teams used to run out there back then .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 28612
pizza_Place: What??
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nardi wrote:
312player wrote:
Imo Ruth never saw a heater over 93

I don't think he saw a heater over 90. According to Fastball, a documentary, Johnson was I think, high 80's.



Wrong. You guys seem to be suggesting that people "evolved" in two or three generations. There still has never been anyone who threw harder than Nolan Ryan. And nobody in the majors right now throws harder than Feller. Sure, they can take some middling reliever and throw 104 on the scoreboard so goofs like you jizz in your pants but that doesn't mean the guy threw harder than Walter Johnson.

And now you want to shrink Ruth. Well then, I think Carlos Zambrano was 6'0", 220. Hell, I saw the fearsome Teddy Bruschi on Sports Center last night and he looked about 5'8", 160.

Feller and Ryan were the fastest in history. It's not a matter of evolution. It's just scientific analysis that was made. If you look at the throwing mechanics of these early guys, you can see they are kinda fucked up. Walter Johnson, high 80's, was all arm. A tweak would put him low 90's.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 9:41 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77050
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
Image



That's from the late 30s. When Ruth was 25 he looked like Bryce Harper.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 9:47 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77050
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Wrong. You guys seem to be suggesting that people "evolved" in two or three generations. There still has never been anyone who threw harder than Nolan Ryan. And nobody in the majors right now throws harder than Feller. Sure, they can take some middling reliever and throw 104 on the scoreboard so goofs like you jizz in your pants but that doesn't mean the guy threw harder than Walter Johnson.

And now you want to shrink Ruth. Well then, I think Carlos Zambrano was 6'0", 220. Hell, I saw the fearsome Teddy Bruschi on Sports Center last night and he looked about 5'8", 160.
That's why I asked before how well the teams Ruth played on would do today.



Well, if you took the '27 Yankees and brought them en masse in a time machine to 2018 I don't think they would dominate. In general people were smaller, nutrition was worse, etc. But if you could implant the fetuses of the guys on that team into women who would give birth to them in 1990, I would say they would dominate more than they did in 1927.

That really has nothing to do with Ruth though. He's a complete outlier. He was so big and fast for a guy that size in his time. He's just like Harper but playing back then.

Here's why this is a dumb argument. What if I said Michael Jordan would be a good bench player if he played today. I mean, players are bigger, stronger, and they shoot better. Jordan had to beat slobs like Charles Barkley who got drunk every night and ate hot dogs. That would be pretty fucking silly, right? But it's like every generation thinks that "evolution" somehow peaked with their favorite players.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 9:48 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101893
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Babe Ruth would be lucky to have the career of Tim Anderson today.

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 9:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Babe Ruth would be lucky to have the career of Tim Anderson today.

Frank....I'm your biggest fan....and I get it: you've been up all night feeding the bambino....but this is the Great Bambino.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Here's why this is a dumb argument. What if I said Michael Jordan would be a good bench player if he played today. I mean, players are bigger, stronger, and they shoot better. Jordan had to beat slobs like Charles Barkley who got drunk every night and ate hot dogs. That would be pretty fucking silly, right? But it's like every generation thinks that "evolution" somehow peaked with their favorite players.
I think the big leap in terms of "evolution" was the concept of playing sports as a job. Pretty much every player back then had other jobs besides Ruth, who was an actor. It was a much smaller leap but youth sports, mostly because you could make a lot of money as an adult, improved greatly too.

I agree with you completely that Babe Ruth, if born in the 1980s, would be a dominant player now. You aren't that far ahead of everyone in your time without being able to do it in your time with the notable exception of basketball players who relied completely on overmatching their opponents based on height.

To me, this discussion is more about Babe Ruth as the exact player he was back then and I don't think he would be very good without major adjustments. That isn't a knock on him. There are MLB players now that haven't been able to adjust to the concept of the shift because they grew up in an era where it didn't exist.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 9:57 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
It was almost 100 years ago but here’s an interesting article about a “study” of Ruth done in the twenties. Take it for what it’s worth.

https://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/ ... run-hitter

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
To me, this discussion is more about Babe Ruth as the exact player he was back then and I don't think he would be very good without major adjustments. That isn't a knock on him. There are MLB players now that haven't been able to adjust to the concept of the shift because they grew up in an era where it didn't exist.


Ruth made the ultimate adjustments: he went from being mainly a pitcher to a batter and as a batter almost totally recreated the game. He could make any adjustment that was required of him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:03 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
tommy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
To me, this discussion is more about Babe Ruth as the exact player he was back then and I don't think he would be very good without major adjustments. That isn't a knock on him. There are MLB players now that haven't been able to adjust to the concept of the shift because they grew up in an era where it didn't exist.


Ruth made the ultimate adjustments: he went from being mainly a pitcher to a batter and as a batter almost totally recreated the game. He could make any adjustment that was required of him.

Babe Ruth would be just fine in today’s game.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Mr. Reason wrote:
It was almost 100 years ago but here’s an interesting article about a “study” of Ruth done in the twenties. Take it for what it’s worth.

https://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/ ... run-hitter

Interesting. Sounds like what they say about Ted Williams and his eyesight....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 28612
pizza_Place: What??
Ruth used a 47 ounce bat because he was under the false impression that big bat, big power. It didn't hurt him because he didn't have to deal with speed. Today a hitting coach would laugh at him. Ruth would soon find out that to hit Chapman, he needs to use a lighter bat.

Just because pitching sucked in Ruth's time doesn't extrapolate to Ruth sucking today. But there's just not a chance he's Babe fucking Ruth in today's game. There's just too many animals coming at you from all angles for him to dominate like he did.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Nardi wrote:
Ruth used a 47 ounce bat because he was under the false impression that big bat, big power. It didn't hurt him because he didn't have to deal with speed. Today a hitting coach would laugh at him. Ruth would soon find out that to hit Chapman, he needs to use a lighter bat.

Just because pitching sucked in Ruth's time doesn't extrapolate to Ruth sucking today. But there's just not a chance he's Babe fucking Ruth in today's game. There's just too many animals coming at you from all angles for him to dominate like he did.

Probably, but they're playing the game he invented. Fuck the phrase "dead ball era." Baseball's timeline should be BBR and ABR. Whomever coined the phrase "Copernican shift" should be embarrassed; it should be "Ruthian shift." In fact, I am gonna find the coiner's grave and place a post-it note with the word "Jerkass" on it (before removing it out of guilt and a fear that the person's ghost will haunt me).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 28612
pizza_Place: What??
tommy wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Ruth used a 47 ounce bat because he was under the false impression that big bat, big power. It didn't hurt him because he didn't have to deal with speed. Today a hitting coach would laugh at him. Ruth would soon find out that to hit Chapman, he needs to use a lighter bat.

Just because pitching sucked in Ruth's time doesn't extrapolate to Ruth sucking today. But there's just not a chance he's Babe fucking Ruth in today's game. There's just too many animals coming at you from all angles for him to dominate like he did.

Probably, but they're playing the game he invented. Fuck the phrase "dead ball era." Baseball's timeline should be BBR and ABR. Whomever coined the phrase "Copernican shift" should be embarrassed; it should be "Ruthian shift." In fact, I am gonna find the coiner's grave and place a post-it note with the word "Jerkass" on it (before removing it out of guilt and a fear that the person's ghost will haunt me).

You're posts are Ruthian. They dominate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81627
Nardi wrote:
He was in MLB for 12 or 13 years before he became a "fat piece of shit". There's more film when he was a "fat piece of shit" so you remember him as a "fat piece of shit".

:lol:

I was joking. I know all about Babe Ruth and how great he was.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81627
312player wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Pedro would strike out this fat piece of shit with ease



This is your best post in 2018 and I agree

Now go watch Major Payne and Div 3 FF

Haha...I wrote that in 312anese


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 28612
pizza_Place: What??
rogers park bryan wrote:
Nardi wrote:
He was in MLB for 12 or 13 years before he became a "fat piece of shit". There's more film when he was a "fat piece of shit" so you remember him as a "fat piece of shit".

:lol:

I was joking. I know all about Babe Ruth and how great he was.

Ah... nevermind. I'm flopping around the bottom of the boat. Do you mind throwing me back in the water please?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80165
The entire nation wanted to be a baseball player when Ruth was making his way up. There were enough good players to have multiple minor league teams on each level. Competition was fierce every single day.

Dan Bernstein can turn around a modern 95 mph fastball.

People called difficult accomplishments "Herculean" for millenia before Ruth, then they became "Ruthian".

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Last edited by good dolphin on Thu Dec 13, 2018 2:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
good dolphin wrote:
The entire nation wanted to be a baseball player when Ruth was making his way up.
I'm not sure about that. Pretty much everyone who wasn't Babe Ruth had to sell cars or pump gas to live because they didn't make very much.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81627
good dolphin wrote:
The entire nation wanted to be a baseball player when Ruth was making his way up.

and most of them were allowed to play in the league if they were good enough


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 2:09 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77050
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
rogers park bryan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
The entire nation wanted to be a baseball player when Ruth was making his way up.

and most of them were allowed to play in the league if they were good enough



I think the pool of players was larger in Ruth's time. Sure, now blacks play and guys from outside the U.S. play, but there's just as good a chance that the best baseball player might be riding a skateboard at the X Games or playing point guard for an NBA team. It's like dolphin said.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17588
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
Relating it to the Original 6 years of the NHL. The talent pool was only Canada and the northern US, but there were only 6 teams at the highest level. Every team was essentially an all star team. Drop those old guys into this new era as teens and quite a few of them would end up being stars.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 3:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54268
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
GoldenJet wrote:
Relating it to the Original 6 years of the NHL. The talent pool was only Canada and the northern US, but there were only 6 teams at the highest level. Every team was essentially an all star team. Drop those old guys into this new era as teens and quite a few of them would end up being stars.

That's not entirely true. The Rangers and Black Hawks were no all-star teams for much of that time, they were just the Kansas City A's for Detroit.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 3:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Sure, now blacks play and guys from outside the U.S. play, but there's just as good a chance that the best baseball player might be riding a skateboard at the X Games or playing point guard for an NBA team. It's like dolphin said.

Agreed. Someone give Arcidiacono a bat and get him the fuck off the Bulls roster.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 3:57 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77149
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Wrong. You guys seem to be suggesting that people "evolved" in two or three generations. There still has never been anyone who threw harder than Nolan Ryan. And nobody in the majors right now throws harder than Feller. Sure, they can take some middling reliever and throw 104 on the scoreboard so goofs like you jizz in your pants but that doesn't mean the guy threw harder than Walter Johnson.

And now you want to shrink Ruth. Well then, I think Carlos Zambrano was 6'0", 220. Hell, I saw the fearsome Teddy Bruschi on Sports Center last night and he looked about 5'8", 160.
That's why I asked before how well the teams Ruth played on would do today.



Well, if you took the '27 Yankees and brought them en masse in a time machine to 2018 I don't think they would dominate. In general people were smaller, nutrition was worse, etc. But if you could implant the fetuses of the guys on that team into women who would give birth to them in 1990, I would say they would dominate more than they did in 1927.

That really has nothing to do with Ruth though. He's a complete outlier. He was so big and fast for a guy that size in his time. He's just like Harper but playing back then.

Here's why this is a dumb argument. What if I said Michael Jordan would be a good bench player if he played today. I mean, players are bigger, stronger, and they shoot better. Jordan had to beat slobs like Charles Barkley who got drunk every night and ate hot dogs. That would be pretty fucking silly, right? But it's like every generation thinks that "evolution" somehow peaked with their favorite players.


I'm with you about Ruth being great in any era but comparing him to Harper is laughable.

Look at some of the photos of the basketball players from the 70's and 80's. Most had very little body fat and ALL had better endurance than the players today.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54268
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Nas wrote:
Look at some of the photos of the basketball players from the 70's and 80's. Most had very little body fat and ALL had better endurance than the players today.

Everyone was so skinny! You didn't see basketball players who looked like they could moonlight as tight ends.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 4:00 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77149
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Curious Hair wrote:
Nas wrote:
Look at some of the photos of the basketball players from the 70's and 80's. Most had very little body fat and ALL had better endurance than the players today.

Everyone was so skinny! You didn't see basketball players who looked like they could moonlight as tight ends.


Agreed

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80165
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
The entire nation wanted to be a baseball player when Ruth was making his way up.
I'm not sure about that. Pretty much everyone who wasn't Babe Ruth had to sell cars or pump gas to live because they didn't make very much.


They also didn't want/need as much.

I went through one of those old tenements off of Taylor Street that had been converted and I didn't think it was big enough for my wife and I. Meanwhile, each unit probably housed a large and extended family

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80165
the mechanics of hitting the ball are the same today as they were forever. Ruth hit them out of ballparks. Maybe his home runs would only go as far as Abreu's.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 136 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group