It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:48 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24201
pizza_Place: It's gone
https://baseballhall.org/discover/2022- ... ame-ballot

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24201
pizza_Place: It's gone
Prediction : Only Big Papi gets in. Schilling gets snubbed again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
If you won't vote for Bonds, I can't see justifying a vote for Ortiz.

And some nitwit on the MLB Network was suggesting that the career and numbers for Bobby Abreu were similar to those of Tony Gwynn. Showing how stupid many voters are.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 1:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 15979
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Tracker of public ballots submitted so far has Bonds, Clemens, Ortiz over 75%, but this doesn't include private ballots, which usually ding the PED guys:

https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?res ... 6pmWGGlQsI
Quote:
The question that remains for Ortiz is whether his drop from what the Tracker shows on announcement day resembles what we've seen from Bonds and Clemens (they dropped more than 11 percent last year) or less (Andruw Jones, for example, dropped 5.1 percent, while Todd Helton only fell 2.4 percent)," Thibodaux said. "If the post-results public voters and private voters treat Ortiz like they treat Bonds and Clemens, Ortiz is likely to fall short of 75 percent. If they treat him more charitably as they tend to do for most other candidates, then he has a real chance to be a first-ballot Hall of Famer
https://www.mlb.com/news/baseball-hall- ... pdate-2022


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55816
Regular Reader wrote:
If you won't vote for Bonds, I can't see justifying a vote for Ortiz.

And some nitwit on the MLB Network was suggesting that the career and numbers for Bobby Abreu were similar to those of Tony Gwynn. Showing how stupid many voters are.

:lol: what an idiot. Abreu couldn't tie Gwynn's shoes on his best day

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7217
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
all of those underlined final year guys should be already.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
man of few opinions wrote:
all of those underlined final year guys should be already.


I agree, except for Shilling. I go the Hub Arkush route with him.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24201
pizza_Place: It's gone
Hussra wrote:
Tracker of public ballots submitted so far has Bonds, Clemens, Ortiz over 75%, but this doesn't include private ballots, which usually ding the PED guys:

https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?res ... 6pmWGGlQsI
Quote:
The question that remains for Ortiz is whether his drop from what the Tracker shows on announcement day resembles what we've seen from Bonds and Clemens (they dropped more than 11 percent last year) or less (Andruw Jones, for example, dropped 5.1 percent, while Todd Helton only fell 2.4 percent)," Thibodaux said. "If the post-results public voters and private voters treat Ortiz like they treat Bonds and Clemens, Ortiz is likely to fall short of 75 percent. If they treat him more charitably as they tend to do for most other candidates, then he has a real chance to be a first-ballot Hall of Famer
https://www.mlb.com/news/baseball-hall- ... pdate-2022


The tracker is consistently like 10 percent more than the actual vote results. So those Bonds/Clemens probably don't get in.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 20500
pizza_Place: Pizanos
There are probably a dozen guys on that ballot that should go in.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7217
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
There are probably a dozen guys on that ballot that should go in.

and another dozen that shouldn't be on any hall of fame ballot.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 2:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24201
pizza_Place: It's gone
I keep hearing Mark Bhurle has no shot. Why? He was one of the best pitchers in the game when he played.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7217
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
HawaiiYou wrote:
I keep hearing Mark Bhurle has no shot. Why? He was one of the best pitchers in the game when he played.

Because his name is too hard to spell.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:00 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101888
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Regular Reader wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
all of those underlined final year guys should be already.
I agree, except for Shilling. I go the Hub Arkush route with him.
But you stump for Bonds? He's just as big a POS as Shilling, maybe even more so.


HawaiiYou wrote:
I keep hearing Mark Bhurle has no shot. Why? He was one of the best pitchers in the game when he played.
He was not. All Time great Sox player, but he never finished in the Top 5 for Cy Young voting. A deserving All Star at times and deserving of having his #56 retired, but he is not a Hall of Famer ya rube.

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:03 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77046
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
RFDC wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
If you won't vote for Bonds, I can't see justifying a vote for Ortiz.

And some nitwit on the MLB Network was suggesting that the career and numbers for Bobby Abreu were similar to those of Tony Gwynn. Showing how stupid many voters are.

:lol: what an idiot. Abreu couldn't tie Gwynn's shoes on his best day



You sure about that? Bobby Abreu is a really underrated player. Obviously, Gwynn was a better hitter for average than Abreu but Abreu actually got on more. And there are a lot of other things that Abreu did better than Gwynn.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 40118
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Abreus are always overrated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7217
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
If you won't vote for Bonds, I can't see justifying a vote for Ortiz.

And some nitwit on the MLB Network was suggesting that the career and numbers for Bobby Abreu were similar to those of Tony Gwynn. Showing how stupid many voters are.

:lol: what an idiot. Abreu couldn't tie Gwynn's shoes on his best day



You sure about that? Bobby Abreu is a really underrated player. Obviously, Gwynn was a better hitter for average than Abreu but Abreu actually got on more. And there are a lot of other things that Abreu did better than Gwynn.

positive


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55816
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
If you won't vote for Bonds, I can't see justifying a vote for Ortiz.

And some nitwit on the MLB Network was suggesting that the career and numbers for Bobby Abreu were similar to those of Tony Gwynn. Showing how stupid many voters are.

:lol: what an idiot. Abreu couldn't tie Gwynn's shoes on his best day



You sure about that? Bobby Abreu is a really underrated player. Obviously, Gwynn was a better hitter for average than Abreu but Abreu actually got on more. And there are a lot of other things that Abreu did better than Gwynn.

I am absolutely positive.

There is no universe where Abreu is better than Gwynn.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:09 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101888
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
And there are a lot of other things that Abreu did better than Gwynn.
Like strike out- to the tune of 1800+ vs 437.

Their OBP and OPS numbers are very similar. Gwynn has career WAR by 9

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
all of those underlined final year guys should be already.
I agree, except for Shilling. I go the Hub Arkush route with him.
But you stump for Bonds? He's just as big a POS as Shilling, maybe even more so.


HawaiiYou wrote:
I keep hearing Mark Bhurle has no shot. Why? He was one of the best pitchers in the game when he played.
He was not. All Time great Sox player, but he never finished in the Top 5 for Cy Young voting. A deserving All Star at times and deserving of having his #56 retired, but he is not a Hall of Famer ya rube.


Agreed on Beurhrle.

And while Bonds is arguably the biggest pos of the last 40 years, Shilling is second and a phony grandstanding pos to boot. Plus I never saw him as an all time great, just a moth.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68609
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55816
I am not arguing that Buehrle deserves in because I agree that he doesn't. But at some point HOF is going to need to be redefined for this era of pitching or no one is going to be a HOFer for a long time.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
And there are a lot of other things that Abreu did better than Gwynn.
Like strike out- to the tune of 1800+ vs 437.

Their OBP and OPS numbers are very similar. Gwynn has career WAR by 9

And pulled two under talented teams to the World Series. Not to mention better defense. And iirc a couple of MVP awards as well.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24201
pizza_Place: It's gone
Big Papi did steroids but he's getting in because he wasn't an asshole and was the media's darling in Boston. Plus he was nice to the writers which goes a long way w/ that petty profession.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24201
pizza_Place: It's gone
Terry's Peeps wrote:


exactly! He was one of the best pitchers in his era.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:37 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101888
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
RFDC wrote:
I am not arguing that Buehrle deserves in because I agree that he doesn't. But at some point HOF is going to need to be redefined for this era of pitching or no one is going to be a HOFer for a long time.
If the redefine this era of pitching, which I think they should do, then Buehrle is probably getting in at some point.

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:38 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77046
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
And there are a lot of other things that Abreu did better than Gwynn.
Like strike out- to the tune of 1800+ vs 437.

Their OBP and OPS numbers are very similar. Gwynn has career WAR by 9



That isn't a great argument for saying Gwynn is that much better. 9 player value points over two long careers isn't much. They're completely different types of players, but from a value standpoint, they aren't a lot different.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 28610
pizza_Place: What??
Regular Reader wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
all of those underlined final year guys should be already.
I agree, except for Shilling. I go the Hub Arkush route with him.
But you stump for Bonds? He's just as big a POS as Shilling, maybe even more so.


HawaiiYou wrote:
I keep hearing Mark Bhurle has no shot. Why? He was one of the best pitchers in the game when he played.
He was not. All Time great Sox player, but he never finished in the Top 5 for Cy Young voting. A deserving All Star at times and deserving of having his #56 retired, but he is not a Hall of Famer ya rube.


Agreed on Beurhrle.

And while Bonds is arguably the biggest pos of the last 40 years, Shilling is second and a phony grandstanding pos to boot. Plus I never saw him as an all time great, just a moth.

Everybody should grow the hell up and vote in Schilling, Bonds, and Clemens. AND the biggest dickhead of all, Pete Rose.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Nardi wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
all of those underlined final year guys should be already.
I agree, except for Shilling. I go the Hub Arkush route with him.
But you stump for Bonds? He's just as big a POS as Shilling, maybe even more so.


HawaiiYou wrote:
I keep hearing Mark Bhurle has no shot. Why? He was one of the best pitchers in the game when he played.
He was not. All Time great Sox player, but he never finished in the Top 5 for Cy Young voting. A deserving All Star at times and deserving of having his #56 retired, but he is not a Hall of Famer ya rube.


Agreed on Beurhrle.

And while Bonds is arguably the biggest pos of the last 40 years, Shilling is second and a phony grandstanding pos to boot. Plus I never saw him as an all time great, just a moth.

Everybody should grow the hell up and vote in Schilling, Bonds, and Clemens. AND the biggest dickhead of all, Pete Rose.

Except for the 1980 World Series, I loved Pete Rose. And if the game can sell out to gambling websites, enough is enough for Pete.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 5:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2215
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Nardi wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
all of those underlined final year guys should be already.
I agree, except for Shilling. I go the Hub Arkush route with him.
But you stump for Bonds? He's just as big a POS as Shilling, maybe even more so.


HawaiiYou wrote:
I keep hearing Mark Bhurle has no shot. Why? He was one of the best pitchers in the game when he played.
He was not. All Time great Sox player, but he never finished in the Top 5 for Cy Young voting. A deserving All Star at times and deserving of having his #56 retired, but he is not a Hall of Famer ya rube.


Agreed on Beurhrle.

And while Bonds is arguably the biggest pos of the last 40 years, Shilling is second and a phony grandstanding pos to boot. Plus I never saw him as an all time great, just a moth.

Everybody should grow the hell up and vote in Schilling, Bonds, and Clemens. AND the biggest dickhead of all, Pete Rose.


Agreed, but Sosa, McGwire, and Rafael Palmiero are justifiably out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 6:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2215
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
If you won't vote for Bonds, I can't see justifying a vote for Ortiz.

And some nitwit on the MLB Network was suggesting that the career and numbers for Bobby Abreu were similar to those of Tony Gwynn. Showing how stupid many voters are.

:lol: what an idiot. Abreu couldn't tie Gwynn's shoes on his best day



You sure about that? Bobby Abreu is a really underrated player. Obviously, Gwynn was a better hitter for average than Abreu but Abreu actually got on more. And there are a lot of other things that Abreu did better than Gwynn.


The average right fielder that is already in the Hall of Fame has a WAR of 71.1, Abreu has a WAR of 60.2. However, he's closer in peak WAR (average HOF right fielder: 42.4, Abreu 41.6): https://blogs.fangraphs.com/jaws-and-th ... bby-abreu/.

All that being said, when he was playing, did anyone here view him as one of the MLB's top 5 players? Or even top 10 players? I know I didn't. He was also only selected to just two Allstar games.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group