It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 3:12 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
1. Texas Rangers
2. Houston Astros (compensation for not signing Brady Aiken)
3. Houston Astros 1.0
4. Chicago Cubs 2.0
5. Colorado Rockies 2.5
6. Arizona Diamondbacks 4.0
7. Philadelphia Phillies 5.0
8. San Diego Padres 5.5
9. Minnesota Twins 6.5
10. Boston Red Sox 7.0
11. New York Mets 9.0


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2014 8:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
1. Texas Rangers
2. Houston Astros (compensation for not signing Brady Aiken)
3. Colorado Rockies 1.0
4. Houston Astros 3.5
5. Chicago Cubs 4.5
6. Philadelphia Phillies 5.5
7. Arizona Diamondbacks 5.5
8. Boston Red Sox 6.0
9. Minnesota Twins 7.5
10. San Diego Padres 8.0
11. New York Mets 10.0


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2014 9:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40984
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
So, what you are saying is that the cubs are doing a bad job of losing on purpose?

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2014 9:29 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77054
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
That may have been the best move for the Astros.

The Cubs really need to start getting these guys some major league reps. I know that it won't happen but the bulk of our AAA lineup should be our ML lineup right now. It'll speed up the process of them adjusting to the league and then the league adjusting to them. At this point the Cubs are 2 years away from making the playoffs and 3 years away from competing for a ring.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2014 10:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
It was a horrible move for Houston. It set the organization back by not signing the 1-1 pick and their 5th round pick. Sure they get the 2nd pick in next years draft but it looks to be a weaker draft at the top so they will likely get a less talented player than Aiken. It also seriously damaged their credibility around baseball and with future draft picks. All this to save $1.5M


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2014 10:09 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77054
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
If they believe that the guy wasn't healthy it definitely was. You and I both know that you can't really project how good a baseball draft will be a year before the draft. Landing the 2nd pick is never bad.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2014 10:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Aiken is healthy. The issue was Houston's doctor said he has an abnormally small UCL. Conveniently he was the only one of four doctors to have that diagnosis.

Sure there can and probably will be a pop-up guy but they have a pretty good feel for how the draft is going to look and this one looks weak at the top.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 8:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
1. Colorado Rockies
2. Houston Astros (compensation for not signing Brady Aiken)
3. Texas Rangers
4. Houston Astros 2.5
5. Chicago Cubs 4.5
6. Arizona Diamondbacks 4.5
7. Boston Red Sox 6.0
8. Minnesota Twins 6.5
9. Philadelphia Phillies 6.5
10. San Diego Padres 8.5
11. Chicago White Sox 9.0


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80068
I really wouldn't care if the Sox went into a tailspin at this point. I'm not paying attention anyway with the Bears breaking camp and the college football season two weeks away.

Hooray Losing!

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 88974
Location: To the left of my post
good dolphin wrote:
I really wouldn't care if the Sox went into a tailspin at this point. I'm not paying attention anyway with the Bears breaking camp and the college football season two weeks away.

Hooray Losing!
Compete for half a season and then tank for a high draft pick is the new market inefficiency.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 10:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
1. Texas Rangers
2. Houston Astros (compensation for not signing Brady Aiken)
3. Colorado Rockies 1.0
4. Houston Astros 3.5
5. Arizona Diamondbacks 5.0
6. Chicago Cubs 5.5
7. Philadelphia Phillies 6.0
8. Minnesota Twins 8.0
9. Boston Red Sox 8.5
10. San Diego Padres 10.5
11. New York Mets 10.5


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 8:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
1. Texas Rangers
2. Houston Astros (compensation for not signing Brady Aiken)
3. Colorado Rockies 2.0
4. Houston Astros 4.0
5. Arizona Diamondbacks 4.0
6. Boston Red Sox 5.5
7. Minnesota Twins 7.5
8. Chicago Cubs 7.5
9. Philadelphia Phillies 7.5
10. Chicago White Sox 8.5
11. New York Mets 10.0


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 8:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
1. Texas Rangers
2. Houston Astros (compensation for not signing Brady Aiken)
3. Colorado Rockies 1.0
4. Arizona Diamondbacks 4.0
5. Houston Astros 5.0
6. Minnesota Twins 6.0
7. Boston Red Sox 7.0
8. Chicago Cubs 7.5
9. Chicago White Sox 8.5
10. Philadelphia Phillies 9.0
11. New York Mets 10.5


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
1. Texas Rangers
2. Houston Astros (compensation for not signing Brady Aiken)
3. Colorado Rockies 5.0
4. Arizona Diamondbacks 5.0
5. Minnesota Twins 7.0
6. Houston Astros 9.0
7. Boston Red Sox 9.0
8. Chicago White Sox 9.5
9. Chicago Cubs 10.0
10. Philadelphia Phillies 12.5
11. San Diego Padres 12.5


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23917
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
so close to top 5! :lol:

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:01 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101845
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Since August 1st, the White Sox are the worst team in baseball with an incredibly poor 9-23 record. Yowza.

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 8:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
1. Texas Rangers
2. Houston Astros (compensation for not signing Brady Aiken)
3. Colorado Rockies 2.0
4. Arizona Diamondbacks 4.0
5. Minnesota Twins 6.0
6. Chicago Cubs 8.0
7. Boston Red Sox 8.5
8. Houston Astros 9.0
9. Chicago White Sox 11.0
10. San Diego Padres 11.5
11. Philadelphia Phillies 12.0


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23917
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
DAMMIT!!

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 8:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
1. Arizona Diamondbacks
2. Houston Astros (compensation for not signing Brady Aiken)
3. Texas Rangers 0.5
4. Colorado Rockies 3.0
5. Minnesota Twins 4.5
6. Boston Red Sox 6.0
7. Houston Astros 7.0
8. Chicago Cubs 7.0
9. Philadelphia Phillies 9.0
10. Chicago White Sox 9.5
11. Cincinnati Reds 10.0


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 8:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23917
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
FUCK!!!

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 7:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
I didn't realize the bottom 5 teams are all from the NL. The race for Jason Groome is on!

1. Philadelphia Phillies
2. Atlanta Braves 1.0
3. Colorado Rockies 3.5
4. Cincinnati Reds 4.0
5. Miami Marlins 4.0
6. Oakland Athletics 6.0
7. Milwaukee Brewers 7.5
8. Detroit Tigers 10.5
9. Boston Red Sox 11.5
10. Arizona Diamondbacks 12.0
11. San Diego 12.0
12. Seattle 12.0

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/reversestandings


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 8:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23917
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
goddamn Sox. They can't fucking do anything right.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 28380
Hatchetman wrote:
goddamn Sox. They can't fucking do anything right.

Neither can the Brewers, even though they did better the last 2 nights. :evil:

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
They'll both get good players. This draft is deep.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 28380
Keyser Soze wrote:
They'll both get good players. This draft is deep.

The Brewers farm system has changed pretty dramatically with all of the trades going back to Gallardo.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Yes it has. They have a nice collection of high upside position players. They (like just about every other team in baseball) could use a few more arms. That's too bad about Kirby. I hope he comes thru this ok.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2015 7:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 28380
Keyser Soze wrote:
Yes it has. They have a nice collection of high upside position players. They (like just about every other team in baseball) could use a few more arms. That's too bad about Kirby. I hope he comes thru this ok.

Yeah, there is concern there for sure. Injured all year and then comes back and now this.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
1. Philadelphia Phillies
2. Atlanta Braves
3. Colorado Rockies 4.5
4. Cincinnati Reds 5.0
5. Miami Marlins 5.5
6. Oakland Athletics 5.5
7. Milwaukee Brewers 6.5
8. Detroit Tigers 10.0
9. San Diego Padres 11.0
10. Chicago White Sox 12.5


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23917
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
hey hey!! movin' on up. NICE.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reverse standings
PostPosted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
1. Philadelphia Phillies
2. Atlanta Braves 4.0
3. Colorado Rockies 7.5
4. Milwaukee Brewers 7.5
5. Cincinnati Reds 8.0
6. Miami Marlins 8.0
7. Oakland Athletics 8.0
8. Detroit Tigers 14.0
9. San Diego Padres 14.0
10. Chicago White Sox 15.0


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group