if you're an old-line media outlet, or even a new one, you're queueing up to hire someone from this fallout and the ensuing ex-gawker media diaspora. if you're a company trying to make money on the web slanging content, you want some of this gawker DNA in your company. whatever else they might have been, might have done, Gawker somehow made bank pushing content:

Rich kids from the Northeast will land on their feet somehow. They always do.

_________________

Denton may end up on his knees.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal

I hope someone good buys deadspin. Like Bill Simmons or Fox.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

She is the worst...

http://deadspin.com/ashley-feinberg-is-gawker-medias-thirstiest-blogger-1785149762

_________________

_________________
Obama's Legacy is Trump.
And dead cops.

"One guy lays the pipe, the other guy smokes it"--Clint Eastwood

did anyone actually read that? Is there a single normal non-douchebag that works for gawker media? The amount of arrogance these bloggers exude is fascinating to me

I got halfway through then had a nose bleed from the overwhelming smarm factor.

_________________

_________________

That is why I'm not crying for Gawker about the evil billionaire destroying them.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

in the wake of the story that CH quoted/pasted a bit upthread, i shudder to realize that SOME ppl are going out on a limb to claim that this hogan vs gawker lawsuit/settlement/shitshow is actually some kind of "attack on free speech" or maybe even "freedom of the press" because i guess some in the media (i actually saw those swell "taiwanese animators" on youtube claim this) want to say that going after gawker here in the hootie hogan case = a crushing blow towards the future of free speech via a "free" press.

seriously, how did we end up with these [wonderful people paragon to all that's good, decent, and honest/hard-working/pulling-yourself-up-from-your-bootstraps] supposedly representing some last bastion of free speech/press in the world? i don't buy the argument that gawker specifically in this hootie hogan case is truly "fighting for our freedom" cuz they basically wanna be able to post str8up sextapes on their sites and be like "nyah nyah nyah maybe next time you shouldn't get taped fucking your friend's wife!" in lieu of people being like "what the fuck gawker you're actually posting a "stolen" sex tape here like it's important news worth fighting for philosophically"



obviously an attempt at levity/humor in the wake of a grilling, but still kinda representative of the kind of mindset/mentality they have over there when discussing the definition of "news" -- i just can't believe that these people are technically fighting for my freedom, you know? they just wanna get clicks/views/eyeballs so they can get $$$PAID$$$ cuz every business/company is only beholden to one thing: profits (as well it should be? </abovemypaygrade>)

_________________

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/16/opinion/peter-thiel-the-online-privacy-debate-wont-end-with-gawker.html?smid=tw-share

Thiel sums it all up perfectly here. Gawker kept on gambling and lost when someone who was finally bigger and stronger than them came around.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

It's still troubling no matter how you look at it. Gawker is not sympathetic, but this is happening everywhere. See Sheldon Adelson and the Las Vegas papers.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

No, it isn't troubling at all.

Other examples may be troubling. This one isn't.

If anything, this is an example of a well monied and lawyered up organization(Gawker) not being able to legally maneuver themselves out of it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

The only way they were able to be shutdown is because a billionaire said so. If you don't think that's troubling, well then I think you are failing to see how interconnected all of this is.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

Why is a rag getting shut down troubling?

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

The troubling thing is that a billionaire decided he had a grudge against a media outlet and just sued them into oblivion.

_________________

he didn't sue them over nothing. You're forgetting that. They left themselves in a dumb position.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.

I am not forgetting that. I don't think Gawker is some bastion of great journalistic intent, but be careful what you wish for siding with a billionaire that wants to silence speech he doesn't like.

_________________

I think the more fucked up thing is that there are many people who aren't billionaires or don't have the backing of billionaires who had legitimate reasons to sue Gawker but lacked the resources to bump heads with them. I guess Gawker should have stuck to fucking with poor people.

_________________
Don't take it personally.

That's fair enough. Fucking with poor people usually works out better for the people doing the fucking.

_________________

Exactly. Gawker was a rich lawyered up company that was doing this to others. A bigger guy came along and stopped them. There is nothing to be concerned about here.

A group with a lot of money was rightfully found accountable by a group with more money.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

As long as the suit is valid, and this clearly was, then siding with a billionaire isn't bad.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

I'm sure those people are smiling today too.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

Going to have to agree to disagree there. No good billionaires in my world. Eat the rich ya dig.

_________________

Gawkers not going anywhere. The journalism itself will go on, the bad actors like Denton and that AJ prick are the ones who were most hurt by the lawsuit. Peter Thiel is one of the worst people on the planet, but I think the "this is very troubling" sentiment is overblown.

The Las Vegas paper story isn't a good analogy. That's 10x worse and probably shouldn't even be legal.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul

Yep. It was not the girl's tape that brought them down. It took someone with resources. The rest of us are fair game.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

Here is the analogy. You have to vet your material through the super rich and connected.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

Only two bidders for Gawker, auction is today:

Ziff-Davis and

Univision? ¿¡Qué rayos!?

Univision apparently also owns part of.... the Onion.

Ziff-Davis, not sure how they're still around, but they'd most likely be purchasing the company to chop it up and sell off the individual parts.