It is currently Sun Nov 10, 2024 2:43 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 276 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:47 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79337
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
formerlyknownas wrote:
Members of individual Christian faiths did attempt to forcibly covert people, and obviously many Christians are evangelical (they want to spread the faith), but yeah, I don't think that there is any "we gotta take it over for God" directive at the center of Christianity.


I'm not arguing that Christians, particularly those from Catholic Church at its most monolithic, didn't commit many atrocities. But I would suggest that the religious aspects in the cases you seem to be referencing, i.e. colonialism, weren't the focus but rather just a tool used in pursuit of other, completely secular goals, i.e. glomming natural resources.

It would be difficult to draw a straight line from the Bible, especially the New Testament, in order to justify such behavior. Not so with what is currently happening with Islam.

_________________
Don't take it personally.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33063
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
CallerBob, what is the address to that religious message board where they have parallel arguments to this board, Religiousfanatics.com?

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
Members of individual Christian faiths did attempt to forcibly covert people, and obviously many Christians are evangelical (they want to spread the faith), but yeah, I don't think that there is any "we gotta take it over for God" directive at the center of Christianity.


I'm not arguing that Christians, particularly those from Catholic Church at its most monolithic, didn't commit many atrocities. But I would suggest that the religious aspects in the cases you seem to be referencing, i.e. colonialism, weren't the focus but rather just a tool used in pursuit of other, completely secular goals, i.e. glomming natural resources.

It would be difficult to draw a straight line from the Bible, especially the New Testament, in order to justify such behavior. Not so with what is currently happening with Islam.

No--I totally agree with that. There's no directive in Christianity that says that. But I just don't know if there is one in Islam.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Seacrest wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Islam is not the enemy. Islamic states are the enemy.


States? terrorists don't even belong to states. they try to find "non-states) from which to operate.

Sounds like you missed his point.


It's becoming damn near impossible to have a rational discussion with religious people. They don't even address the points you make.

As far as I'm aware, no one in this thread has called for the state eradication of religion (that would be completely un-American), yet two of these guys are rambling on about communist Russia. And they're blaming a religion (Islam) expanding because of a lack of religion in the area.


What a great response.

It's hard to have a conversation with people that acknowledge history that I choose to deny because I'm too lazy to investigate said history, or I simply choose to deny its existence.


Communist Russia has ZERO to do with this argument. WFR is of the opinion that eliminating religion would help, but he didn't at all call for STATE-SPONSORED elimination of religion. If you're going to argue, read first.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
Members of individual Christian faiths did attempt to forcibly covert people, and obviously many Christians are evangelical (they want to spread the faith), but yeah, I don't think that there is any "we gotta take it over for God" directive at the center of Christianity.


I'm not arguing that Christians, particularly those from Catholic Church at its most monolithic, didn't commit many atrocities. But I would suggest that the religious aspects in the cases you seem to be referencing, i.e. colonialism, weren't the focus but rather just a tool used in pursuit of other, completely secular goals, i.e. glomming natural resources.

It would be difficult to draw a straight line from the Bible, especially the New Testament, in order to justify such behavior. Not so with what is currently happening with Islam.


No, it wouldn't. People interpret religious teachings to justify whatever beliefs they want to hold.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
leashyourkids wrote:
[

No, it wouldn't. People interpret religious teachings to justify whatever beliefs they want to hold.


Exactly!

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41373
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
formerlyknownas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
Members of individual Christian faiths did attempt to forcibly covert people, and obviously many Christians are evangelical (they want to spread the faith), but yeah, I don't think that there is any "we gotta take it over for God" directive at the center of Christianity.


I'm not arguing that Christians, particularly those from Catholic Church at its most monolithic, didn't commit many atrocities. But I would suggest that the religious aspects in the cases you seem to be referencing, i.e. colonialism, weren't the focus but rather just a tool used in pursuit of other, completely secular goals, i.e. glomming natural resources.

It would be difficult to draw a straight line from the Bible, especially the New Testament, in order to justify such behavior. Not so with what is currently happening with Islam.

No--I totally agree with that. There's no directive in Christianity that says that. But I just don't know if there is one in Islam.


Ibn Ishaq: 992 – “Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19480
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
formerlyknownas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
Members of individual Christian faiths did attempt to forcibly covert people, and obviously many Christians are evangelical (they want to spread the faith), but yeah, I don't think that there is any "we gotta take it over for God" directive at the center of Christianity.


I'm not arguing that Christians, particularly those from Catholic Church at its most monolithic, didn't commit many atrocities. But I would suggest that the religious aspects in the cases you seem to be referencing, i.e. colonialism, weren't the focus but rather just a tool used in pursuit of other, completely secular goals, i.e. glomming natural resources.

It would be difficult to draw a straight line from the Bible, especially the New Testament, in order to justify such behavior. Not so with what is currently happening with Islam.

No--I totally agree with that. There's no directive in Christianity that says that. But I just don't know if there is one in Islam.


There are numerous ones as written in the Holy books of Islam. Take some time and look them up

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33063
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Caller Bob wrote:

Ibn Ishaq: 992 – “Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah.


Good thing we invented Terminator machines before them.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
Members of individual Christian faiths did attempt to forcibly covert people, and obviously many Christians are evangelical (they want to spread the faith), but yeah, I don't think that there is any "we gotta take it over for God" directive at the center of Christianity.


I'm not arguing that Christians, particularly those from Catholic Church at its most monolithic, didn't commit many atrocities. But I would suggest that the religious aspects in the cases you seem to be referencing, i.e. colonialism, weren't the focus but rather just a tool used in pursuit of other, completely secular goals, i.e. glomming natural resources.

It would be difficult to draw a straight line from the Bible, especially the New Testament, in order to justify such behavior. Not so with what is currently happening with Islam.


No, it wouldn't. People interpret religious teachings to justify whatever beliefs they want to hold.

I used to think that--but there are some good people out there. Of course, a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41373
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
denisdman wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:

Ibn Ishaq: 992 – “Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah.


Good thing we invented Terminator machines before them.


I'm not understanding your jokes here, denis.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:56 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79337
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
Members of individual Christian faiths did attempt to forcibly covert people, and obviously many Christians are evangelical (they want to spread the faith), but yeah, I don't think that there is any "we gotta take it over for God" directive at the center of Christianity.


I'm not arguing that Christians, particularly those from Catholic Church at its most monolithic, didn't commit many atrocities. But I would suggest that the religious aspects in the cases you seem to be referencing, i.e. colonialism, weren't the focus but rather just a tool used in pursuit of other, completely secular goals, i.e. glomming natural resources.

It would be difficult to draw a straight line from the Bible, especially the New Testament, in order to justify such behavior. Not so with what is currently happening with Islam.


No, it wouldn't. People interpret religious teachings to justify whatever beliefs they want to hold.


Do it then. Make a reasonable argument based on something from the New Testament that supports blowing yourself up in a pizza parlor. I don't believe you can.

Beyond that, there are no Christians who are widely accepted as learned religious scholars who support such beliefs.

_________________
Don't take it personally.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
chaspoppcap wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
Members of individual Christian faiths did attempt to forcibly covert people, and obviously many Christians are evangelical (they want to spread the faith), but yeah, I don't think that there is any "we gotta take it over for God" directive at the center of Christianity.


I'm not arguing that Christians, particularly those from Catholic Church at its most monolithic, didn't commit many atrocities. But I would suggest that the religious aspects in the cases you seem to be referencing, i.e. colonialism, weren't the focus but rather just a tool used in pursuit of other, completely secular goals, i.e. glomming natural resources.

It would be difficult to draw a straight line from the Bible, especially the New Testament, in order to justify such behavior. Not so with what is currently happening with Islam.

No--I totally agree with that. There's no directive in Christianity that says that. But I just don't know if there is one in Islam.


There are numerous ones as written in the Holy books of Islam. Take some time and look them up


"And the Lord said, 'Whack ye all the serpents which crawl on their bellies and thy town shall be a beacon unto others.'"

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
Members of individual Christian faiths did attempt to forcibly covert people, and obviously many Christians are evangelical (they want to spread the faith), but yeah, I don't think that there is any "we gotta take it over for God" directive at the center of Christianity.


I'm not arguing that Christians, particularly those from Catholic Church at its most monolithic, didn't commit many atrocities. But I would suggest that the religious aspects in the cases you seem to be referencing, i.e. colonialism, weren't the focus but rather just a tool used in pursuit of other, completely secular goals, i.e. glomming natural resources.

It would be difficult to draw a straight line from the Bible, especially the New Testament, in order to justify such behavior. Not so with what is currently happening with Islam.


No, it wouldn't. People interpret religious teachings to justify whatever beliefs they want to hold.


Do it then. Make a reasonable argument based on something from the New Testament that supports blowing yourself up in a pizza parlor. I don't believe you can.

Beyond that, there are no Christians who are widely accepted as learned religious scholars who support such beliefs.


That's the point. A crazy person doesn't have to make a reasonable argument. They just have to believe what they want to believe.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41373
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
formerlyknownas wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
Members of individual Christian faiths did attempt to forcibly covert people, and obviously many Christians are evangelical (they want to spread the faith), but yeah, I don't think that there is any "we gotta take it over for God" directive at the center of Christianity.


I'm not arguing that Christians, particularly those from Catholic Church at its most monolithic, didn't commit many atrocities. But I would suggest that the religious aspects in the cases you seem to be referencing, i.e. colonialism, weren't the focus but rather just a tool used in pursuit of other, completely secular goals, i.e. glomming natural resources.

It would be difficult to draw a straight line from the Bible, especially the New Testament, in order to justify such behavior. Not so with what is currently happening with Islam.

No--I totally agree with that. There's no directive in Christianity that says that. But I just don't know if there is one in Islam.


There are numerous ones as written in the Holy books of Islam. Take some time and look them up


"And the Lord said, 'Whack ye all the serpents which crawl on their bellies and thy town shall be a beacon unto others.'"


A verse that advocates killing snakes, what am I missing here?
Image


Last edited by Caller Bob on Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:58 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38209
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
leashyourkids wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Islam is not the enemy. Islamic states are the enemy.


States? terrorists don't even belong to states. they try to find "non-states) from which to operate.

Sounds like you missed his point.


It's becoming damn near impossible to have a rational discussion with religious people. They don't even address the points you make.

As far as I'm aware, no one in this thread has called for the state eradication of religion (that would be completely un-American), yet two of these guys are rambling on about communist Russia. And they're blaming a religion (Islam) expanding because of a lack of religion in the area.


What a great response.

It's hard to have a conversation with people that acknowledge history that I choose to deny because I'm too lazy to investigate said history, or I simply choose to deny its existence.


Communist Russia has ZERO to do with this argument. WFR is of the opinion that eliminating religion would help, but he didn't at all call for STATE-SPONSORED elimination of religion. If you're going to argue, read first.


There are numerous Communist regimes that have called for the elimination of religion. Russia, China and Albania for sure.

If you are going to join someone else's conversation, then reading BEFORE you RESPOND would be HELPFUL for you.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
shakes wrote:
Only way to stop ISIS is genocide against Muslims.

At this point can anyone honestly answer no to the question, "would the world be a better place if there were no Muslims in it?"

Let's round em all up then gas em, but this time be sure to finish the job so we don't have to hear about it for at least seventy-some years.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Last edited by Don Tiny on Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:59 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79337
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
Members of individual Christian faiths did attempt to forcibly covert people, and obviously many Christians are evangelical (they want to spread the faith), but yeah, I don't think that there is any "we gotta take it over for God" directive at the center of Christianity.


I'm not arguing that Christians, particularly those from Catholic Church at its most monolithic, didn't commit many atrocities. But I would suggest that the religious aspects in the cases you seem to be referencing, i.e. colonialism, weren't the focus but rather just a tool used in pursuit of other, completely secular goals, i.e. glomming natural resources.

It would be difficult to draw a straight line from the Bible, especially the New Testament, in order to justify such behavior. Not so with what is currently happening with Islam.


No, it wouldn't. People interpret religious teachings to justify whatever beliefs they want to hold.


Do it then. Make a reasonable argument based on something from the New Testament that supports blowing yourself up in a pizza parlor. I don't believe you can.

Beyond that, there are no Christians who are widely accepted as learned religious scholars who support such beliefs.


That's the point. A crazy person doesn't have to make a reasonable argument. They just have to believe what they want to believe.


Now you're making a case that there is a higher percentage of "crazy" Muslims than there are of any other religion. I don't believe that could possibly be the case.

_________________
Don't take it personally.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91816
Location: To the left of my post
Seacrest wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
What were the directives that you are referring to brick?
The ones that you "aren't supposed to take literally". I'm sure you know them.


I don't.

Speak up.
Just look it up.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Caller Bob wrote:

A verse that advocates killing snakes, what am I missing here?
Image


One of the very best Simpsons episodes...top five....

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Seacrest wrote:
If you are going to join someone else's conversation, then reading BEFORE you RESPOND would be HELPFUL for you.



Good God, you still don't understand! No one is calling for state-sponsored elimination of religion.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:02 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38209
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
What were the directives that you are referring to brick?
The ones that you "aren't supposed to take literally". I'm sure you know them.


I don't.

Speak up.
Just look it up.


So you got nothing?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33063
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Caller Bob wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:

Ibn Ishaq: 992 – “Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah.


Good thing we invented Terminator machines before them.


I'm not understanding your jokes here, denis.


Too coherent for you. I understand.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41373
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
leashyourkids wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
If you are going to join someone else's conversation, then reading BEFORE you RESPOND would be HELPFUL for you.



Good God, you still don't understand! No one is calling for state-sponsored elimination of religion.


He usually does this type of thing under his "Panther" account but he must have got his "log ins" mixed up today.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
Members of individual Christian faiths did attempt to forcibly covert people, and obviously many Christians are evangelical (they want to spread the faith), but yeah, I don't think that there is any "we gotta take it over for God" directive at the center of Christianity.


I'm not arguing that Christians, particularly those from Catholic Church at its most monolithic, didn't commit many atrocities. But I would suggest that the religious aspects in the cases you seem to be referencing, i.e. colonialism, weren't the focus but rather just a tool used in pursuit of other, completely secular goals, i.e. glomming natural resources.

It would be difficult to draw a straight line from the Bible, especially the New Testament, in order to justify such behavior. Not so with what is currently happening with Islam.


No, it wouldn't. People interpret religious teachings to justify whatever beliefs they want to hold.


Do it then. Make a reasonable argument based on something from the New Testament that supports blowing yourself up in a pizza parlor. I don't believe you can.

Beyond that, there are no Christians who are widely accepted as learned religious scholars who support such beliefs.


That's the point. A crazy person doesn't have to make a reasonable argument. They just have to believe what they want to believe.


Now you're making a case that there is a higher percentage of "crazy" Muslims than there are of any other religion. I don't believe that could possibly be the case.


No, I'm in fact not doing that. I'm telling you that any religious text can be used to believe stupid things. Islam doesn't have a huge rate of violence because of its written word. It has a higher rate because of its current culture and the radical elements that are raising children to believe the same thing.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91816
Location: To the left of my post
Seacrest wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
What were the directives that you are referring to brick?
The ones that you "aren't supposed to take literally". I'm sure you know them.


I don't.

Speak up.
Just look it up.


So you got nothing?

It's on the same internet as all those gay organizations that are against gay marriage. Look it up.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Beyond that, there are no Christians who are widely accepted as learned religious scholars who support such beliefs.

Perhaps there would be if Christians had been subjected to the centuries of imperialist violence the US and Europe have launched on the Middle East. But I realize that brings actual materialism into the picture instead of the reductive and convenient motherlode of bad ideas rubbish.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
formerlyknownas wrote:
Members of individual Christian faiths did attempt to forcibly covert people, and obviously many Christians are evangelical (they want to spread the faith), but yeah, I don't think that there is any "we gotta take it over for God" directive at the center of Christianity.


I'm not arguing that Christians, particularly those from Catholic Church at its most monolithic, didn't commit many atrocities. But I would suggest that the religious aspects in the cases you seem to be referencing, i.e. colonialism, weren't the focus but rather just a tool used in pursuit of other, completely secular goals, i.e. glomming natural resources.

It would be difficult to draw a straight line from the Bible, especially the New Testament, in order to justify such behavior. Not so with what is currently happening with Islam.


No, it wouldn't. People interpret religious teachings to justify whatever beliefs they want to hold.


Do it then. Make a reasonable argument based on something from the New Testament that supports blowing yourself up in a pizza parlor. I don't believe you can.

Beyond that, there are no Christians who are widely accepted as learned religious scholars who support such beliefs.


That's the point. A crazy person doesn't have to make a reasonable argument. They just have to believe what they want to believe.


Now you're making a case that there is a higher percentage of "crazy" Muslims than there are of any other religion. I don't believe that could possibly be the case.

It could be the case if the causes of craziness are in the world. Like Saudi Arabia's per capita household income falling from 28 grand to 7 grand in a decade's time--I think that made people angry, which is worse than being crazy. Then religion becomes a vehicle for anger.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
When you eradicate religion, something else will take its place. I think South Park (which is very critical of religion) demonstrated this quite well.

but hey, keep being a revisionist liar and deny basic historical facts such as the fact Communists tried to eradicate religion via force.


You are the one being dishonest. Communism tried to replace one religion with another. And South Park is your statement on the path of humanity?

Your religion is just as made up as Islam. You can cling to it if you want, but it's human made ignorance. When you can get past that you can start to see a path out. You do not need imaginary sky gods to live a moral life or to feel a part of something larger. And if we trust science it will have answers for some of the questions that religion created stories to answer.

That's the entire point, when you eliminate religion, the role it filled will invariably be filled by something else. Please tell me this is an act, you can't possibly be this dense.


If you use South Park as a guide for a future without religion calling anyone dense is laughable. If you believe in a sky god, even more so.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mosque Attack
PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
ZephMarshack wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Beyond that, there are no Christians who are widely accepted as learned religious scholars who support such beliefs.

Perhaps there would be if Christians had been subjected to the centuries of imperialist violence the US and Europe have launched on the Middle East. But I realize that brings actual materialism into the picture instead of the reductive and convenient motherlode of bad ideas rubbish.


Talk about not knowing your history. Muslims have been quite aggressive in colonizing others. This only ended because they fell behind in science, which has been a good thing for human progress.

Islam claims to be the ultimate solution to all human problems. The final revelation of the Abrahamic god. To claim that this belief has no influence on this group of people is laughable. Is the West to blame for their lack of scientific achievements as well?

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 276 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 10  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group