long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
You just sound ridiculous when you say things like "nowhere near." You're basing it off completely cherry-picked stats like "scoring per 100 possessions." Well, no shit... Jordan took way more shots. Give us the stats on efficiency.
LeBron has dragged teams to the Finals with different casts of characters. It seems like you invent a different reason to not acknowledge this every year.
And I won't say he's better at this point. But I will continue to laugh at people who say there's no comparison or that Jordan was "clearly more dominant." All you have to do is watch LeBron play to see that no one in NBA history is "clearly better."
Lebron has closed the gap but what makes it difficult in terms of assessment is the level of competition that he is currently competing against. He isn't nor has ever had to dominate an all time great player and the closest that he came to it was last year during the finals and arguably he was outplayed by Durant.
The guy he happens to be "dominating" is a rookie drafted late first round. How hard is that?
When Jordan was good he had to matchup with guys like
1. Drexler
2. Dumars
3. Miller
4. Harper
5. Richmond
This was just at his position. It was easier to gauge his greatness because he had to outplay other great players. Lebron doesn't have to do that. Who was he matched up against in the first series? Can anyone remember?
The level of separation that he is establishing is relative to the guys he happens to be playing against. That has to be factored into the discussion.
You want to talk teammates? look at those shitty ass Bulls teams pre Pippen.
Guys like Sam Vincent, Gene Banks, Dave Corzine. All in the starting lineup.
Lebron is playing with an All Star in Love and also plays on a team with the highest payroll in the league. Before the season started a number of pundits lauded the Cavs for having a first and second unit that was capable of making the playoffs. Now the supporting cast isn't shit because they just have to protect and further enrich the legacy of Lebron.
Basketball is not about 1 on 1 matchups like yoh make it. They often don't guard each other, and even if they do it's a team effort - especially today.
That said, even if we went by your very flawed method, you're cherry-picking the matchups. He rarely played Richmond or Drexler, and Reggie Miller was a terrible defender. Joe Dumars was there on teams that beat Jordan with the exception of one.
A more approriate list in the playoffs would be Craig Ehlo, John Starks, Nick Anderson, and Bryon Russell. In perhaps his greatest Finals appearance, his matchup was a broken down Dan Majerle.
There is a lot of flaws found in this diatribe. First of all each of these guys checked Jordan and vice versa. They didn't cross match in the good ole days as guys tended to guard their position. Your youth is a showing on that. Secondly Jordan and Drexler hooked it up in the NBA finals when Drexler was regarded as the 2nd best player in the league by MANY.
3rd. If you are going to make comparisons based upon individual ability then you very much have to look at performance based upon individual matchups. Too often in these discussions team success is used as a justification and cover for individual deficiencies. If we use team success then Jordan trumps him there as well. 6 for 6 in the NBA finals. Never played in a series that went 7 games.
4th James's 2nd banana in Miami is regarded by MANY as the 3rd best 2 guard in history. He is also regarded as a better player than Scottie Pippen. James didn't play with Bums to get his rings. Bosh is also a better player than Ho Grant.
5th Jordan had to defeat much tougher teams in order to get to the Finals and win in the Finals. East is a joke (Ask Vegan). James's run has been enhanced by the fact that East is a shitty conference front ran by bum ass teams in most cases. FF correctly referenced the lack of 50 win teams and that Bulls team from 7 years ago is the only credible team that he had to beat.